On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a > | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the > | portage sources that say to fix/implement X, a discussion on project > | ML Y working on Z. > > Would our users really like to read a lengthy discussion on the > intricacies of the changes made to versionator.eclass to improve > performance, or the way in which the ten zillion packages needed by > the new KDE/Gnome/Xorg release were keyworded for a particular arch, > or the design decisions made for vim-spell.eclass to avoid requiring > that our users have four gigs of RAM? I mean, it'd be pretty frickin' > boring... I think Fabian is targetting cross-dev communications there ...
It'd be time-consuming but sounds interesting. There's lots of "unimportant" info, like ... say ... what fixes are in the new baselayout? Is gcc4 safe to use? ... Having all that in a central place (like planet.g.o, only moderated) might help - if there is enough support! Patrick -- Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
