On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 12:57 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> >> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
> >> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> | However, as has been pointed out several times in this thread already,
> | back when the devloper community agreed to the overlays project it was
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
| However, as has been pointed out several times in this thread already,
| back when the devloper community agreed to the overlays project it was
| also agreed that projects similar to what is now known as Project
| Sunrise
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> It's no more or less supported than anything else on
> overlays.gentoo.org. The word "overlays" ought to be enough. I suppose
> you oppose the whole concept, anyhow?
No, I am certainly not opposed to overlays in general. I even mai
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> While I do think this proposal is much better than the previous
> non-existing proposal, it still doesn't address the problem of having
> the sunrise overlay hosted on a non *.gentoo.org address to make it
> 100% clear to the public that it is unsupported.
It's no mor
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
>> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
>> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
>> satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dost
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
> satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
> as well.
While I
Comments inline ...
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 13:37 +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
> other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
> satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
> as
On 6/10/06, Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
as well.
1) m-w / m-n requiremen
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:37:15 +0200
Markus Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and
> various other people for help here), we now have a resolution that
> should satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress
> dostrow's demands as
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
as well.
1) m-w / m-n requirement
Only ebuilds that are reported to bugzie (valid bug#)
11 matches
Mail list logo
