Re: [gentoo-dev] Panda 3D licensing issues

2005-06-18 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 17/06/05, Joshua Baergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "An electronic copy of the source code for all modifications > made to the Software are to be forwarded to Licensor at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] within 90 days of the date of the > modifications." > > I didn't notice anything in the license tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Panda 3D licensing issues

2005-06-17 Thread Ferris McCormick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Chris White wrote: I was given a user submitted ebuild request for the package panda3d. However, upon reading the licesnse is it seems that it's one of those "sacrifice your newborn child and kill kittens" type licenses. Some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Panda 3D licensing issues

2005-06-17 Thread Joshua Baergen
On 6/18/05, Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was given a user submitted ebuild request for the package panda3d. > However, upon reading the licesnse is it seems that it's one of those > "sacrifice your newborn child and kill kittens" type licenses. Someone mind > going over it and ve

[gentoo-dev] Panda 3D licensing issues

2005-06-17 Thread Chris White
I was given a user submitted ebuild request for the package panda3d. However, upon reading the licesnse is it seems that it's one of those "sacrifice your newborn child and kill kittens" type licenses. Someone mind going over it and verifying I'm not totally lost there: http://panda3d.org/man