-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Chris White wrote:
I was given a user submitted ebuild request for the package panda3d.
However, upon reading the licesnse is it seems that it's one of those
"sacrifice your newborn child and kill kittens" type licenses.
Someone mind going over it and verifying I'm not totally lost there:
http://panda3d.org/manual.php?page=license
Thanks,
Chris White
I suppose it's paragraph 4 you object to? It seems to say that if a user
makes changes to Panda and then distributes Panda with these changes, then
(1) the changes must be identified as the user's, not as Panda's, (2) the
user must send these changes to Panda.
For Gentoo, I suppose that means that if Gentoo has to make changes to the
software in order to support it, then Gentoo must identify them as Gentoo
changes and send them to Panda. In Gentoo's case, this seems mostly to
mean that Panda must be told what Gentoo has to do to support Panda.
Or am I missing something?
Regards,
Ferris
- --
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCs2uPQa6M3+I///cRAiXNAJ44wlYgPlCwIwMqpbZ4fdZuTLvA6wCgp1wr
joKukJG7XpnHSjDYpVTs6V4=
=8lBI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
