Dirkjan Ochtman schrieb:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, yac wrote:
>> Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the
>> former it could be worth a try to -m.
> Yeah, I kind of feel it should be -m, as well. If need be, we can be
> more proactive about kickbanning peopl
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, yac wrote:
> Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the
> former it could be worth a try to -m.
Yeah, I kind of feel it should be -m, as well. If need be, we can be
more proactive about kickbanning people (ops enough, after all).
Chee
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:02:29 +0400
Sergey Popov wrote:
> 22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет:
> > I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can
> > indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to
> > developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm reminded of it e
22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет:
> I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can
> indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to
> developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm reminded of it every
> time the #gentoo-dev channel mode catches my eye, painfull
