On 28-11-2005 18:54:14 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:57 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
> | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > | A
Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Nov 28 2005, 12:46:57PM CST]
> > Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a
> > rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless
> > it gets some review...
Heh. Personally, I've never really been all that fond of the GWN be
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:57 +0100
Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not bring back the "the GWN is a community thing and YOU can also
> contribute!!!" mentality?
Release early, release often?
JeR
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
| I suggest that in the future, all developers who are directly quoted
| in the GWN are contacted prior to posting the quotes. I realize that
| this will put a bit more work load on the GWN authors, but it should
| be as simple as sending a mail with the relevant section quoted for
| the developer
Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a
>>rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless
>>it gets some review...
>
> Why not bring back the "the GWN is a community thing and YOU can also
> contribute!!!" mentality?
>
>
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:57 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured
|
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in
> | this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me
> | anything
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in
| this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me
| anything regarding the GWN...
Not the first time this has happened...
| I
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:46:47PM +0100, George Shapovalov wrote:
> On Monday, 28. November 2005 12.30, Simon Stelling wrote:
> > Is there a good reason for sending this to -dev?
> Because he wanted to let users know of corrections? At least the ones who
> care.
Exactly.
Regards,
Brix
--
Henr
On Monday, 28. November 2005 12.30, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Is there a good reason for sending this to -dev?
Because he wanted to let users know of corrections? At least the ones who
care.
As for the original issue, isn't this the policy and how it has always been in
fact? Back in earlier days
Is there a good reason for sending this to -dev? You basically complain
about the way the GWN authors handled the issue, so why do you tell it
all the devs? It seems a bit like a lame attempt to blame them in public
for their faults.
Other than that, I agree with you.
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo
A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in
this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me
anything regarding the GWN...
So I fired up a web browser and there it was - first section in the
GWN [1]. Seems the GWN authors have read my blog entry [2] and dec
12 matches
Mail list logo
