On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in > | this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me > | anything regarding the GWN... > > Not the first time this has happened...
Not the first time that people whine. Meh. > | I suggest that in the future, all developers who are directly quoted > | in the GWN are contacted prior to posting the quotes. I realize that > | this will put a bit more work load on the GWN authors, but it should > | be as simple as sending a mail with the relevant section quoted for > | the developer to accept. > > Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a > rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless > it gets some review... Why not bring back the "the GWN is a community thing and YOU can also contribute!!!" mentality? That Ulrich and I have made some suboptimal decisions in the past is a fact, but why aren't there more contributors to the GWN so that we two aren't single points of failure? /me returns to lurking in some dark caves -- Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
