On 02/09/2018 05:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> Wait, since it was just in DEPEND, I don't understand the problem.
>
> If it were in RDEPEND, I could understand. But in DEPEND, it'll get
> depcleaned without any problem as far as I can tell.
>
After being subjected to a totally incomprehensible
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> # Matt Turner (06 Feb 2018)
>> # Dead and unused
>> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838
>> x11-libs/libXCalibrate
>> x11-libs/libXfontcache
>> x11-misc/xtscal
>> x11-proto/fontcacheproto
>> x1
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:02:28 -0500
Brian Evans wrote:
> On 2/8/2018 12:14 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:05:55 +0100
> > Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> >> Thanks for the information and sorry for the noise.
> >> I wasn't fully aware of the meaning of the --dynamics-deps and
>
On 2/8/2018 12:14 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:05:55 +0100
> Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>> Thanks for the information and sorry for the noise.
>> I wasn't fully aware of the meaning of the --dynamics-deps and
>> --changed-deps option. I am still not entirely convinced that
>> c
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> # Matt Turner (06 Feb 2018)
>> # Dead and unused
>> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838
>> x11-libs/libXCalibrate
>> x11-libs/libXfontcache
>> x11-misc/xtscal
>> x11-proto/fontcacheproto
>> x1
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018 18:05:55 +0100
Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> Il 08/02/2018 16:04, James Le Cuirot ha scritto:
> >>> Citing Kenneth Hoste at FOSDEM this year: modifying a package
> >>> without changing its version is a bad idea.
> >>> His presentation was very good (video included):
> >>> https://
Il 08/02/2018 16:04, James Le Cuirot ha scritto:
Citing Kenneth Hoste at FOSDEM this year: modifying a package
without changing its version is a bad idea.
His presentation was very good (video included):
https://fosdem.org/2
018/schedule/event/how_to_make_package_managers_cry/
This isn't so c
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:51:52 +0200
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> > > > From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17
> > > > 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Matt Turner
> > > > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800
> > > > Subject: x1
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 14:57 +0100, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> > > From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17
> > > 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Matt Turner
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800
> > > Subject: x11-base/xorg-server: Remove dead x11-
> > > proto/xf86rushproto depende
From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Turner
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800
Subject: x11-base/xorg-server: Remove dead x11-proto/xf86rushproto dependency
rushproto hasn't been required since upstream commit 8ec79e05feac (in
2005!), and even th
On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> # Matt Turner (06 Feb 2018)
> # Dead and unused
> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838
> x11-libs/libXCalibrate
> x11-libs/libXfontcache
> x11-misc/xtscal
> x11-proto/fontcacheproto
> x11-proto/xcalibrateproto
> x11-proto/xf86rushproto
> From e59
# Matt Turner (06 Feb 2018)
# Dead and unused
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838
x11-libs/libXCalibrate
x11-libs/libXfontcache
x11-misc/xtscal
x11-proto/fontcacheproto
x11-proto/xcalibrateproto
x11-proto/xf86rushproto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
