On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans <grkni...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2018) >> # Dead and unused >> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838 >> x11-libs/libXCalibrate >> x11-libs/libXfontcache >> x11-misc/xtscal >> x11-proto/fontcacheproto >> x11-proto/xcalibrateproto >> x11-proto/xf86rushproto > > >> From e590965cdeb0c921194740da0481c85afaa1ebae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> >> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 14:02:59 -0800 >> Subject: x11-base/xorg-server: Remove dead x11-proto/xf86rushproto dependency >> >> rushproto hasn't been required since upstream commit 8ec79e05feac (in >> 2005!), and even then it wasn't actually needed! >> >> Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6 >> --- >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.5.ebuild | 3 +-- >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.19.6.ebuild | 3 +-- >> x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-9999.ebuild | 3 +-- >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > > Please don't edit dependencies in-line like this. > > This warranted a revbump as users will be asking how to remove > x11-proto/xf86rushproto. It won't come up for depclean because of > xorg-server not being scheduled for rebuild automatically until the next > time it is upgraded or --changed-deps option is used (uncommon).
Wait, since it was just in DEPEND, I don't understand the problem. If it were in RDEPEND, I could understand. But in DEPEND, it'll get depcleaned without any problem as far as I can tell.
