Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-26 Thread Sam James
Eli Schwartz writes: > On 9/25/24 1:47 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> Hello >> >> > [...] >> To my knowledge, one big issue right now is a circular dep between >> glib->gobject-introspection->glib, which needs proper solving to move >> forward with things. Or at least look at reducing the glib requ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Zac Medico
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 3:46 PM James Le Cuirot wrote: > Yes, the glib/gobject-introspection conflict was my main test case. It was an > interesting one because it also involved some blockers. I pushed my half baked > idea up to GitHub in the hope that Zac or someone could maybe take it and > actu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 23:46 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 14:41 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > > > same package twice with different U

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Wed, 2024-09-25 at 14:41 -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > > same package twice with different USE flags in the same emerge process > > in order to solve cyclical

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Yuan Liao (Leo3418)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 08:47:30PM +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Hello > > > The state of GNOME in Gentoo could use a bunch of work and we don't > really have the developers currently to take care of it. > My own grandiose plans to be back and keep things in good order faced > sad reality (a bunc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 02:05:10PM -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: > Chewi was also trying to see if portage can be convinced to stage the > same package twice with different USE flags in the same emerge process > in order to solve cyclical USE flag dependencies, but it's not a > guarantee... I see it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 9/25/24 1:47 PM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Hello > > > The state of GNOME in Gentoo could use a bunch of work and we don't > really have the developers currently to take care of it. > My own grandiose plans to be back and keep things in good order faced > sad reality (a bunch of personal things)

[gentoo-dev] Help needed for maintaining GNOME

2024-09-25 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Hello The state of GNOME in Gentoo could use a bunch of work and we don't really have the developers currently to take care of it. My own grandiose plans to be back and keep things in good order faced sad reality (a bunch of personal things) and we could really use some help in at least carefully