Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01-12-2010 19:13, Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > wrote: > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > There will probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for > that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? Mailing list: http://bugs.gentoo.org/329165 I have no idea how to go about doing an automated webpage or other in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:58:20 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 12/1/10 9:34 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: Catalyst sends automated emails to rel...@gentoo.org from the various build boxes: dolphin, poseidon, other dev.g.o machines. So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/1/10 9:34 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > Catalyst sends automated emails to rel...@gentoo.org from the > various build boxes: dolphin, poseidon, other dev.g.o machines. So we have some automatic reporting. Can we have a webpage for that, or a mailing list that people can subscribe to? Idea: ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/1/10 9:13 PM, Alec Warner wrote: >> How does a developer know when the stage generation is broken? Is >> there a dashboard? At work we have a guy who is basically a build cop >> and checks our build dashboard once a day or so and if it is broken he >> goes and finds the guy who broke it and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Joshua Saddler
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:13:03 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > >> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrot

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >>> There will probably be no active version of Python set. >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-12-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 12/01/10 05:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated > weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink / > wrapper, stages generation failed on stage2 run. Yes, a fellow dev already reported that issue to me. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-30 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01-12-2010 03:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated > weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink / > wrapper,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-30 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: >> There will probably be no active version of Python set. > > You had two weeks to come up with this. > > Please find my on IRC to team up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-29 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > There will probably be no active version of Python set. You had two weeks to come up with this. Please find my on IRC to team up on an agreed fix. Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-29 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-11-29 08:39:46 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a): > On 11/28/10 19:04, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > You probably broke generation of stages :) . > > (I have restored a minimal version of eselect_python_update() in python > > overlay.) > > Could you elaborate on that, please? Ho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-28 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 11/28/10 19:04, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > You probably broke generation of stages :) . > (I have restored a minimal version of eselect_python_update() in python > overlay.) Could you elaborate on that, please? How did I break stages? Which stages? Future stage tarballs?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-28 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-11-27 14:00:28 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a): > On 11/14/10 17:28, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > So I plan to remove the call to eselect_python_update from all Python > > ebuilds in two weeks from now. > > Now fixed in both the main tree as well as the Python overlay. > Please let me know in ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-27 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 11/14/10 17:28, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > So I plan to remove the call to eselect_python_update from all Python > ebuilds in two weeks from now. Now fixed in both the main tree as well as the Python overlay. Please let me know in case I broke anything. Best, Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-15 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/15/2010 02:02 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Since none are slotted, I don't understand what outcome you expect by > contacting the maintainers. > At best, perl-cleaner and ocaml-rebuild.sh shall be merged into portage in a > preserve-libs like manner. In case some aren't aware, I'll mention

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-15 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Monday 15 November 2010 11:37:08 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 11/14/10 22:42, Florian Philipp wrote: > > Is there a chance to do the same for perl and perl-cleaner? > > > > I understand perl is not slotted at the moment and there are probably > > good technical reasons for not doing so but I s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-15 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 11/14/10 22:42, Florian Philipp wrote: > Is there a chance to do the same for perl and perl-cleaner? > > I understand perl is not slotted at the moment and there are probably > good technical reasons for not doing so but I still wanted to ask. :) I'm not sure if the Perl team is watching this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-14 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 14.11.2010 17:28, schrieb Sebastian Pipping: > > With Python, when you install a newer version if gets activated, leaving > your system in broken state. An update of Python always involves > running python-updater. If the user/admin has to run that anyway, why > should we take the call to ese

[gentoo-dev] Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version

2010-11-14 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello, thanks for your interest. This thread is not about Python 3.x in particular, in case you wonder. In this mail - Typical GCC update (for comparison) - Python 2.7 update simulation (and how it fails) - The scenario - What happens - How it happens - Conclusion Typical