On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 15:54 +0400, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 02.03.2014 19:52, Michał Górny пишет:
> > Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
> > Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> >
> >> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> >> Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >>> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to u
Dnia 2014-03-04, o godz. 15:54:18
Sergey Popov napisał(a):
> 02.03.2014 19:52, Michał Górny пишет:
> > Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
> > Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> >
> >> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> >> Michał Górny wrote:
> >>
> >>> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on ho
02.03.2014 19:52, Michał Górny пишет:
> Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
> Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
>
>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
>>> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. Howeve
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Unless I have missed mgorny's point here, this isn't just about
>> libraries that have currently subslots. This is about every single
>> library in the tree.
>
> Some (many?) libra
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:58:47 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about
> > packages which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be
> > involved could be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so
> > packages that depend on dev-libs/
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Unless I have missed mgorny's point here, this isn't just about
> libraries that have currently subslots. This is about every single
> library in the tree.
Some (many?) libraries rarely change API/ABI so it wouldn't make sense
to include th
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
>> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
>> be done in less than a day (for the
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
> be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so packages that depend
> on dev-libs/libgcrypt
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> My script for spotting opportunities to use slot op deps is still out
> there. Of course, I wouldn't just "fix" any ebuild that comes up as
> there are situations where it isn't appropriate. What would probably
> make sense is for QA to defin
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Honestly, setting up a tracker and blocking it with bugs about packages
> which someones-sub-SLOT-checking-script has vetted to be involved could
> be done in less than a day (for the hundred or so packages that depend
> on dev-libs/libgcrypt
Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 19:09:09
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:32:05 -0500
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > >
> > >> Few months ago I have written
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 12:32:05 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> >> and subslots for library dependencies proper
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
>> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
>> I see that most of the developers didn't car
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 17:34:36 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > How about you file a tracker bug report for each library package,
> > and then file bug reports per package using that dependency
> > blocking the tracker bug?
>
> I see your point. However please read this beautiful document for
Am Sonntag, 2. März 2014, 16:45:03 schrieb Jeroen Roovers:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
>
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> > and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> > I see that most of the developers did
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:52:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> > How about you file a tracker bug report for each library package,
> > and then file bug reports per package using that dependency
> > blocking the tracker bug?
>
> Excuse me but are you serious?
Sure.
> I'm supposed to report a faftilli
Dnia 2014-03-02, o godz. 16:45:03
Jeroen Roovers napisał(a):
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> > and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> > I see that most of the developers
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:37:22 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
> and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
> I see that most of the developers didn't care to properly update their
> packages and when I introduced bina
Hi,
Few months ago I have written a small FAQ on how to use slots
and subslots for library dependencies properly [1]. However, today
I see that most of the developers didn't care to properly update their
packages and when I introduced binary compatibility slot in libgcrypt,
I had my hands full of
19 matches
Mail list logo
