On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:02:09 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> > If GLEP doesn't reflect current best practices maybe this is a good
> > time to supersede it with a new one?
>
> Not this again, please. :( The GLEP outlines the framework under which
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
>> If GLEP doesn't reflect current best practices maybe this is a good
>> time to supersede it with a new one?
>
> Not this again, please. :( The GLEP outlines the framework under which
> QA
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> If GLEP doesn't reflect current best practices maybe this is a good
> time to supersede it with a new one?
Not this again, please. :( The GLEP outlines the framework under which
QA operates, but there is no need to codify every detail in a GLEP
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:49:07 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Anthony G. Basile schrieb:
> > On 12/05/14 05:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> We found out that pulseaudio ebuild was modified by QA without QA
> >> talking to the maintainers (gnome team) and without considering/updating
> >> the
Anthony G. Basile schrieb:
> On 12/05/14 05:59, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> We found out that pulseaudio ebuild was modified by QA without QA
>> talking to the maintainers (gnome team) and without considering/updating
>> the relevant bugzilla issue at
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=519530
>>
