On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:02:09 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > If GLEP doesn't reflect current best practices maybe this is a good > > time to supersede it with a new one? > > Not this again, please. :( The GLEP outlines the framework under which > QA operates, but there is no need to codify every detail in a GLEP > (which is somewhat hard to change). > > In fact, the QA team has its own internal policy document: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Policies#Communication_When_Making_Fixes > If something should be missing there, we are certainly open for > additions or changes.
Looks like this internal policy is perfectly fine and contains everything needed for this case. Looks like it just wasn't followed properly (or severity level misjudged, or whatever...) Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
pgpU3UqhvhV5Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
