On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > I believe that's a fair summation of the arguments. My personal opinion,
> > for whatever it's worth as a user on the dev list, is that the CC point
> > is a valid one, the CC list should be a pretty decent measure of inte
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:18:48 -0500:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 09:47 -0500, Aron Griffis wrote:
>> Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Fri Mar 24 2006, 08:55:30AM EST]
>> > As I've said, my only request is a single policy that before an overlay
>>
Duncan wrote:
> I believe that's a fair summation of the arguments. My personal opinion,
> for whatever it's worth as a user on the dev list, is that the CC point is
> a valid one, the CC list should be a pretty decent measure of interest --
> I know it has certainly proven so on some of the bugs
Chris Bainbridge posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:55:15 +:
>> No. It indicates nothing except that 58% of the 80 people who filled
>> out the poll are "not really happy with the way the portage tree is
>> handled" which by my counts, isn't even a drop in th
On Thursday 23 March 2006 20:43, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> On 23/03/06, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Using a remote overlays is rather simple, just do "emerge layman".
> > Read the einfo and then "man layman".
> > It works flawlessly, just tested this with one remote overlay.
On 23/03/06, Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Using a remote overlays is rather simple, just do "emerge layman".
> Read the einfo and then "man layman".
> It works flawlessly, just tested this with one remote overlay.
> Beside that "man layman" explains pretty much of it's innerwork.
On Thursday 23 March 2006 19:16, Duncan wrote:
> Chris Bainbridge posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> excerpted below, on Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:47:13 +:
> > Adding the ebuilds to overlays is one option, but
> > then other users will be expected to find an overlay with their
> > package in, and then
Chris Bainbridge posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:47:13 +:
> Adding the ebuilds to overlays is one option, but
> then other users will be expected to find an overlay with their
> package in, and then add it to make.conf.
... This hints at something I wasn'
