On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 14:46 +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> DEPEND.blacklist of net-wireless/wireless-tools is incorrect.
> kde-base/kwifimanager compiles against iwlib.h.
Correct.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
signature.asc
Descr
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 03:00, Sven Wegener wrote:
> I want developers to take a look at the list and see if packages they
> maintain are listed. I'm aware that the list is quite large and still
> contains a lot of false positives. I can whitelist packages for DEPEND
> or RDEPEND either general,
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 02:00 +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
> I want developers to take a look at the list and see if packages the
> maintain are listed. I'm aware that the list is quite large and still
> contains a lot of false positives. I can whitelist packages for DEPEND
> or RDEPEND either general,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:03:32PM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Are we forbidden from DEPEND=RDEPEND...? I only ask because 90% of the
> dev-perl portions would fall into that category - if it's an rdepend, it can
> be a depend as well (technically you can build without most of the underlying
Are we forbidden from DEPEND=RDEPEND...? I only ask because 90% of the
dev-perl portions would fall into that category - if it's an rdepend, it can
be a depend as well (technically you can build without most of the underlying
rdepends, but you will get warnings from perl that prereqs weren't met
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-07-05 20:00:24 -0400 Sven Wegener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Short explanation for the subject: A *DEPEND mismatch is when a
package
is listed in DEPEND, but missing in RDEPEND and vice versa. I have a
list of ebuilds at
http://dev.gentoo.
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:19:01PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:00:24AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
> [snip]
> Could you possibly split the stuff into two files?
> one for RDEPEND.only and one for DEPEND.only?
http://dev.gentoo.org/~swegener/qa/depend-mismatches-DEPEN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Wegener wrote:
> I want developers to take a look at the list and see if packages they
> maintain are listed. I'm aware that the list is quite large and still
> contains a lot of false positives. I can whitelist packages for DEPEND
> or RDEPEND ei
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:00:24AM +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
[snip]
Could you possibly split the stuff into two files?
one for RDEPEND.only and one for DEPEND.only?
I see a lot more FP for RDEPEND.only.
Many of the RDEPEND.only are correct, as the packages are just scripts
that call other binari
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:12:31PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> you should def whitelist for DEPEND only:
> app-arch/zip
> app-arch/unrar
> dev-util/jam
> media-gfx/nvidia-cg-toolkit
> games-util/loki_patch
I added them to the list of packages being safe to be used in DEPEND
only.
Sven
--
Sve
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 02:12, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> you should def whitelist for DEPEND only:
dev-util/cvs is used by vlc during build process (BDEPEND?)
Still there are a few other RDEPEND which makes sense to not be DEPEND,
especially for scripts.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Deve
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 08:00 pm, Sven Wegener wrote:
> contains a lot of false positives. I can whitelist packages for DEPEND
> or RDEPEND either general, based on eclass usage or for a specific
> package. If you are sure that your package has a safe mismatch, I can
> add it to the whitelist. But
Hi all!
Short explanation for the subject: A *DEPEND mismatch is when a package
is listed in DEPEND, but missing in RDEPEND and vice versa. I have a
list of ebuilds at http://dev.gentoo.org/~swegener/qa/depend-mismatches
that contain such mismatches. I've already whitelisted packages like
automake
13 matches
Mail list logo
