formation so everyone knows what we
> are talking about, and then afterwards concretely discuss my idea for
> implementing it in Gentoo.
>
> The Dynamic Kernel Module System (DKMS, sys-kernel/dkms) is a
> distro-agnostic framework for managing out-of-tree kernel modules.
> You
Check the logfile at ${T}/Xvfb.log
Hello,
08.05.2024 19:15:52 Florian Schmaus :
[..]
> # @FUNCTION: edob
> -# @USAGE: [...]
> +# @USAGE: [-m ] [-l ] [...]
^^!
[..]
> -l is provided, then is
[..]
> edob() {
[..]
> + while true; do
> + case "${1}" in
> + -m|-n)
^^! I
# Bernd Waibel (2023-01-28)
# Possible security issues, obsolete. Use OpenEXR-3 / Imath instead.
# No revdeps and consumers left in ::gentoo
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #892375
media-libs/ilmbase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEExIg3+Emk70nqAQ2ybb4K1Uo7McYFAmJOvDBfFIAALgAo
nsertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 371d52bcb7e..8896768d3ce 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
+# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
# Distri
/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2022 Gentoo Authors
+# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# @ECLASS: distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -1559,7 +1559,7 @@ distutils-r1_python_test() {
esac
if
Am 13.08.2022 11:51 schrieb Andrew Ammerlaan:
On 13/08/2022 11:10, waebbl-gen...@posteo.net wrote:
Thanks Andrew for taking care of these packages. Like I said, I'd be
happy to comaintain the packages and keep an additional two eyes on
them.
Great! Would you like me to add you to the metadata.
>>> Up for grabs because of inactivity.
> >>>
> >>> dev-python/pyside2 has several open bugs and a version bump pending.
> >>>
> >>> Needs some real love to tidy it up.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> sam
> >
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:38:54 +0800
Fabulous Zhang Zheng wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
>
> While gentoo-devhelp is a better place for questions, it's been inactive
> for years so I sent an email here. Apologies if this is solely for gentoo
> developers.
There's #gentoo
t; > dev-python/pyside2 has several open bugs and a version bump pending.
> > >
> > > Needs some real love to tidy it up.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > sam
> >
> > Wouldn't it be applicable to put these packages under the umbrella of
&g
ges under the umbrella of
the Gentoo Qt project?
They're developed, published and hosted by the The Qt Company (in
contrast for example to PyQt5 or QtPy) and are only python
bindings for the Qt framework, although they're currently distributed
in a separate tarball and not with the Qt
mps need to
be avoided.
We could add a central file, something like the metadata/AUTHORS file
with this information. Possibly in a structured format like xml or json
to make it machine readable as well and the information can be
extracted and shown e.g. on the wiki or p.g.o site.
Something like the dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Bernd Waibel (2022-04-07)
# No consumers left. Superseded by dev-libs/imath[python]
# Removal in 30 days.
dev-python/pyilmbase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEExIg3+Emk70nqAQ2ybb4K1Uo7McYFAmJOvDBfFIAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdG
hi.
just pointing out that I do intend to maintain them aain when I
(hopefully soon) have more time again.
Regards
On 2021-01-20 19:27, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
The following packages are up for grabs due to their current maintainer
being unresponsive:
[ ] acct-group/dbmail
[ ] acct-user
From: Alexey Sokolov
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/730190
Signed-off-by: Alexey Sokolov
---
eclass/virtualx.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/virtualx.eclass b/eclass/virtualx.eclass
index 6aba6bf488d..93b9751cfa6 100644
--- a/eclass/virtualx.ec
..daa75a307db 100644
--- a/profiles/features/prefix/package.use.mask
+++ b/profiles/features/prefix/package.use.mask
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
# Copyright 1999-2020 Gentoo Authors
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
+# Alexey Sokolov (2020-10-15)
+# Requires PAM.
+x11-base
From: Alexey Sokolov
I'm running a prefix but tests of various packages are failing in virtx
command. I discovered that this is because virtualx doesn't depend on
xvfb in prefix. But after installing xorg-server[xvfb,-elogind] tests
pass.
elogind flag had to be disabled otherwise it brings pam as
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:20 schrieb Zac Medico:
On 5/23/20 1:02 PM, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the
API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to speed up my
implementation? Have I done something fundamentally wrong
Hi,
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:08 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 22:02 +0200, magic-gen...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
I rewrote e-file in python by using the portage API [1]. But loading the
API slows down the whole script. Is there any way to speed up my
implementation? Have I done somethi
Hi,
the current e-file tool of app-portage/pfl is written in bash. e-file is
a CLI tool which searches portagefilelist.de for a given file and list
additional informations based on the local portage. Latter is done by
grep'ing through the ebuild files which is fast but IMHO not very smart.
I
Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
information.
Here is the list of the bounced messages:
- 89057
On 2018-04-16 17:28, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
The following packages are up for grabs due to the Enlightenment
project
being disbanded:
app-doc/edox-data
dev-libs/efl
dev-python/python-efl
media-libs/elementary
media-libs/imlib2
media-plugins/emotion_generic_players
media-plugins/
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 07:51:55PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, William Hubbs wrote:
>> From what I've read, the traditional difference between bin and sbin
>> was that sbin means static-bin and everything stored in there was to
>> be able to come up without libraries.
this way developers are encouraged to sign their packages (to make
the warning go away) and users get the ability to check the signatures,
that already exist.
Key problem here is the Gentoo keyring (how to ensure it didn't get
manipulated).
>> Okay "why" is clear. Obviously nobo
Hello,
Am 29.09.2011 17:02, schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The issue of Manifest signing came up in #gentoo-hardened channel ...
> again. Its clearly a security issue and yet many manifests in the tree
> are still not signed. Is there any chance that we can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> FWIW, I like this idea a lot. A lot of devs would rather just read
> the good stuff happening in -dev and discard the other 85%. I vote
> yes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Seemant
>
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (
Istanbul
>> Technical University and a real wizard in chess. He is the National
>> Master to be more exact. Please give him the usual warm welcome and try
>> to beat him in online chess.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Petteri
>> --
>> Gentoo/Recruiters lead
>>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sun, 14 May 2006 12:46:23 +0200
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of filter-ldflags is a bad one, IMO. There are an infinite
> number of ways to enable a flag (for -z now: -Wl,-z,now;
> -Wl,-z -Wl,now; -Xlinker -z -Xlinker -now; -Wl,-O1,-z,now; ...). Even
> if you restrict y
On Sat, 13 May 2006 23:04:10 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
>
> Oh, OK, let's argue semantics. It's suggested by a hardened user on a
> bug the hardened team is CC'd on, but the team didn't say anythin
On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:10:22 -0700
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > This was handled in the 6.8.x series and got dropped for unknown
> > reasons when the modular X porting started happening.
> > Unless your dead set on modular X I'd stick with the 6.8.x series.
>
On Sat, 13 May 2006 11:32:49 +0200
Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) skrev:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:49:22 +0200
> > Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I installed modular X on my server running hard
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:49:22 +0200
Simon Strandman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed modular X on my server running hardened.
X on a server? If it's just for the libs that's ok, but running the X
server itself is risky on a server as it's huge and suid so flaws can
easily gain root access
On Fri, 5 May 2006 16:38:57 +0200
Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 05 May 2006 15:23, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > I disagree. Your argument is for not using ~arch at all, rather
> > than an argument against keeping control of what you have from
&
On Fri, 5 May 2006 13:20:09 +0200
Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 05 May 2006 08:32, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > If you use specific versions in the package.keywords file (i.e. do
> > "=category/package-version-revision ~arch" instead
ining
> packages and getting them into portage. For example I would like to
> maintain a munin, munin-plugin, and tightvnc ebuild. Where can I
> find this information. I don't know where to start.
Gentoo Developer Handbook, "Becoming a developer"
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/e
On Thu, 04 May 2006 16:29:56 -0700
Michael Kirkland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This leads to people trying to maintain a
> frankenstinian /etc/portage/package.keywords file, constantly adding
> to it and never knowing when things can be removed from it.
If you use specific versions in the pack
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:29:58 +0200
George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friday, 28. April 2006 21:20, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > 3) A herd does not have an email address - it's not a person or
> > group of people so an email address is nonsensical.
>
the second instance, a package is maintained by the people
indicated by the package's herd entry or entries
at /gentoo/misc/herds.xml
6) The herd entry may specify directly a list of maintainers with
optional roles, or may refer to projects or other herds to locate
maintainers.
Another way o
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:27:12 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:22 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > I must admit I've assumed that the herd entry in metadata.xml is a
> > reasonable fall-back if the maintainer entry is
member of a herd, a package can also
be maintained directly" which implies the herd is the default maintainer
if maintainer is not present.
The herds project description says, "The herds project aims to ensure
that the growing number of ebuilds do not overwelm (sic) the gentoo
projec
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:03:00 +0200
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see some clarification of intended doc use flag usage
From what I've gleaned over time, USE=doc is supposed to enable docs
that are one or more of:
(1) large
(2) take a significant amount of resource to build
(
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:37:45 +
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 13:32 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:46:58 +
> > Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2006-03
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 11:46:58 +
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 12:42 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote:
>
> > This is a valid issue, as ghc is only supplied upstream for linux
> > (some older versions available in mingw32).
>
&g
> architectures that supports Haskell, and in which it's stable enough
> to work... considering we have Gentoo/Alt, it's not that good to
> "cut" us off (yes I know I should be able to make Gentoo/FreeBSD and
> maybe other arches to have ghc, but that's not easy and
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:58:03 +0100
Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During that discussion we realized that having utf-8 not enabled by
> default and no utf8 fonts available by default causes lots of
> recompilation and reconfiguration.
>
> Enabling the unicode useflag in the profiles
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:54:25 +
Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 00:41 +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > For the non technically minded folks whats the difference between
> > -fno-stack-protector and -fno-stack-protector-all?
> [...]
> It was explained to me like t
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:47:33 -0500
solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I forget where I read it but I thought that unicode lead to overflows
> and was considered a general security risk. I wish I knew where I read
> that but I'm unable to find it.
Well, stuff I could find includes:
http://www.kde
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:30:50 -0600
R Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
>
> > 232 matches. http://tinyurl.com/pmrmx
>
> The vast majority of which have an explanation in the comment
> directly preceding.
In which case it's a moment's effort to cut-n-paste the text into the
reassi
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:13:46 +0100
Bjarke Istrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking, how about putting all log related packages into their
> own category?
Personally I think unless there is a real problem that needs to be
resolved, moving packages around should be avoided. We'v
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:48:32 +0100
Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please find attached GLEP 47: "Creating 'safe' environment variables".
Could you add a definition of 'safe' to the GLEP? It's not clear what
this means at the moment.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:28:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:52, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Please lets avoid this assumption. I'd love to make it so we never
> > make this assumption anywhere in the tree so that we could actually
> > build GCC without
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:33:02 -0500
solar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:56 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> DEBUG_CFLAGS=DEBUG_CXXFLAGS="-O -g"
>
> Mike,
> how about
> DEBUG_CFLAGS=DEBUG_CXXFLAGS="-O -g -fno-stack-protector -fno-pie"
It's enough to do LDFLAGS="-nopie" to ge
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:44:41 +0100
George Shapovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. 2005 stands for the standard revision namme (as in Ada 2005)
> really rather than for a particular version.
To elaborate for those unfamiliar with Ada; this is the same sort of
thing as C89, C99. Enforcing the p
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:51:46 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been cleaning up media-fonts/ to work with modular-X, and I see a
> lot of ebuilds with stuff like this:
> for font in *.bdf; do
> /usr/X11R6/bin/bdftopcf ${font} > `basename $font .bdf`.pcf
> d
dness (use
as directed.)
Anyone have a way of doing this that doesn't involve wholesale plundering
of binaries from an amd64 box? Some funky bouillabaisse of use flags,
profiles, and gcc hoodoo? Or am I the only one who thinks this is a pretty
neat idea (digital watches notwithstanding)?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
need to be use here. 3 softwares for a
virtual is quite less.
Why are you placing a REDEPEND instead of a PDEPEND ?
xautolock *doesn't need* on of theses software to compile. It need one
of them to be usable. Is the side, it's a post depend.
++
Beber
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
; -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFCZLqxXVaO67S1rtsRArZcAKC0KPjSd6DVuyRvgu22+Y+o37E1HwCcDDss
> O9zNijm60QbXWpWRwCtOoZQ=
> =aC/a
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
57 matches
Mail list logo
