On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:28:53 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 19 January 2006 18:52, Mark Loeser wrote: > > Please lets avoid this assumption. I'd love to make it so we never > > make this assumption anywhere in the tree so that we could actually > > build GCC without pie or ssp, instead of generating all of the GCC > > profiles for every user. SPLIT_SPECS="no" in make.conf causes just the profile default to be built - is that good enough? > pie is in upstream gcc so your argument here is INVALID and -fno-stack-protector is only a problem if gcc-4.0 is built without the ssp-stubs - from 4.1 onwards that'll be upstream as well. Having said that, I don't think we need -fno-stack-protector in default DEBUG_FLAGS anyway, as it doesn't inhibit debug (unlike -Wl,pie). -- Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
