On 12/11/2016 10:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wr
# Markos Chandras (11 Dec 2016)
# Dead upstream, no maintainer and it hasn't been bumped
# since 2013. Masking for removal in 30 days (wrt bug #489878)
sys-power/powerman
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
e IRC access so please stop speculating and throwing flamebaits
here and there. We have more than enough already.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 12/04/2016 05:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:58:26 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 +
>>> Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/0
On 12/03/2016 05:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 13:13:36 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100
>>> Patrice Clement wrote:
>>>
>>>> Friday
k that bumping and fixing an ebuild at
the same time can be considered an atomic change since it's effectively
a _new_ ebuild
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
irst for a start
>> would
>> be appropriate.
>
> Hardware is not the problem. Lack of software is.
>
Have you considered using openQA[1] like openSUSE[2] and Fedora[3] do
instead of reinventing the wheel?
[1] http://open.qa/
[2] https://openqa.opensuse.org/
[3] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
Hi,
Alex and I have no time to take care of this package so if any of you
wants to help please feel free to add yourself to metadata and start
fixing things ;) There are a few outstanding bugs and a pending version
bump from a few days ago.
Thanks
--
markos
al information on the timeline.
>
> +1
>
> You said it better than I could have.
>
> Ulrich
>
yeah, +1 on that too. I am not too bothered with the name to be honest.
However, using 'ChangeLog' for git logs sounds like something most of us
and users are familiar with already so that should work.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 11/04/2015 05:37 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:34 AM, lejonet wrote:
>> Hi gentoo-dev,
>>
>> I recently had a bout with sudo and sssd, and found that the problem was that
>> sudo wasn't sssd aware and the reason we don't have a USE-flag for
t;
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540540
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525674
>
fwiw, it sounds good to me
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/06/2015 10:29 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 19:39:42 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>&
On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following packages currently use the 'audit' local useflag
>>
>> ~$ qgrep -N -s -l -e "^IUSE.*audit"
utils
sys-apps/shadow
sys-apps/systemd
sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin
sys-freebsd/freebsd-usbin
sys-libs/pam
(+ lightdm which I just committed)
How about making it global with the following description?
"Enable support for sys-process/audit"
which is similar to what most packages use?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ing leaving the
>> Gentoo organisation on Github altogether since it's basically useless
>> (for reasons such as the one you mentioned) and since we have our own
>> bug tracker already.
>
> Well, that shouldn't really hurt as most of our users already know th
not understand 100% what you are trying to say but why not add
gnu_andrew to the java mail alias on pecker? how is metadata.xml going
to solve this problem?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
? because that does seem to be something
portage-internal specific in the way it handles changes in {,R}DEPEND
without revbumps. Where is this thing documented in the first place?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
back to whatever makes more sense to them. Would it
be terribly difficult to set a template in the "Summary" field whenever
the "Keywording and Stabilization" component is selected when filing a bug?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 03/04/2015 02:56 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access
>> to the repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a
>> repository for rw
ks pretty good
One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access to the
repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a repository for
rw access. Is there a way to generate such urls on the web interface?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
p;estimated_time=&flag_type-4=X&form_name=enter_bug&keywords=&maketemplate=Remember%20values%20as%20bookmarkable%20template&op_sys=Linux&priority=Normal&product=Websites&rep_platform=All&requestee_type-4=&short_desc=archives.gentoo.org%3A%20FILL%20IN%20HERE&version=n%2Fa
>
>
Excellent! Looks great. Thank you very much for your hard work
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/22/2015 08:41 AM, Ben de Groot (yngwin) wrote:
> yngwin 15/02/22 06:41:41
>
> Added:libertine-4.7.5.ebuild
> libertine-5.1.3.20110615.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog
> libertine-5.3.0.20120702.ebuild Log: Move from libertin
done by a JIT in the kernel itself. if the kernel
> lacks support for seccomp, daemons generally should fallback at
> runtime. if they don't, people should file bugs to get them
> fixed. -mike
>
Yes please
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN
the same discussion.
The original changelog discussion is here
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_c3436497e445eaf86deea08772e5.xml
There were no objections so we started using it
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_72fafb93225c9f5559415356eb093f44.xml
Can we please bookma
because he/she uses that to prove that QA is
dying, Gentoo is a zombie, cvs sucks and elephants could fly.
So how about we stop replying to such flamebaits for a change? That
would really improve the quality of our lists and people wanting to
start a flame will see that this is no longer the plac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/16/15 13:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 12:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>
>> I too believe that if you are reverting someone's commit you
>> should at least drop him an email to let him know.
mmit you should at
least drop him an email to let him know. How else do you expect him to
know he did something wrong? I am a bit worried QA is taking such
actions without communicating that with the developer. If you don't
let people know they do mistakes, it's likely they will do them agai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/15/15 01:55, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 06:38 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:49:56 +0200 Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have to participate to the discussi
> herd email, or directly to you?
>
>
You don't have to participate to the discussions in the mailing lists
:) You can just contribute code! Even a single patch a month or so is
better than nothing
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
iki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Vmware_developer
which is nice :)
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU32TmAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCElQP/AyxKrLPXFFAxf81V5dB5SIB
PItGeMu0FQrmQcKJ+0Phsr1UJTlkWqLghNOyEYU7sfcstfMKV
spending half an hour tweaking it.
imho, in this particular case, the old behavior is fine by me and it's
what has been around for a long time. If that's not clear, or causes
confusing, perhaps it would be best to document the use flags in a
better way and deal with it.
- --
urbing.
>
> Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
>
we are having the same discussion every couple of months. It should
have been a clue that such issues are not meant to be solved in the
list since we tend to drive everything off-topic in the end.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (23 Dec 2014)
# Homepage returns 404 which probably suggests upstream has vanished.
# Superseded by app-text/dos2unix. Bug #533222
app-misc/fixdos
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
rsions *prior* to 2.19-r1 at this point.
>
> If we do, that makes it easy to fix bug 478764 [1], because there
> would only be three versions of glibc we have to worry about.
>
> thoughts?
>
> William
>
> [1] http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/17/2014 09:43 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/17/14 14:55, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 Oct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2014 01:00 AM, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:25:53 -0400 "Anthony G. Basile"
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/14 13:13, Markos Chandras wrote: Let's face it, this is
>> not a job just anyone can
re is someone
from the toolchain@ team who is going to take care of gcc from now on?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUMs2tXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/11/2014 07:30 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:21:24 +0100 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> On 09/10/2014 03:01 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>
>>> +1; to summarize my thoughts: Herds misrepresent
ct:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs
how do you expect to get more people on board if you don't make it
known where help is actually needed?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUELLEXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/06/2014 09:16 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 11:42 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Oldschool python broke on the new CVS box, fixed now.
>
>
> Hi Robin,
>
> Ok thanks. Is there a way to generate some stat
ection.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUCsLeXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGRDlGMzA4MUI2MzBDODQ4RDBGOEYxMjQx
RjEwRUQ0QjgxREVCRjE5AAoJEB8Q7UuB3r8ZQR8H/22hdfZfk1TZiR2bxR
# Markos Chandras (02 Sep 2014)
# MSN service terminated.
# You can still use your MSN account in net-im/skype
# or switch to an open protocol instead
# Masked for removal in 30 days
net-im/kmess
net-im/amsn
x11-themes/amsn-skins
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
ved these weekly emails for two weeks. Is
there a problem? Maybe you turned them off during the migration but
never turned them back on? Is there another problem? Is there a way to
get some stats for August so I can use them for the upcoming GMN?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
rs?)
>>
>> This has nothing to do with specialists. Tox is configuration-free.
>>
>> And sure, it's pre-alpha as indicated in my previous mail.
>
> So it doesn't work, but you feel the need to feel superior by telling
> everyone
> else that they are doing it wrong.
>
> Sigh.
>
> Can you please troll somewhere else?
>
(picking random email to reply)
can we please move this off-list?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
t;
> [1]:http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/maintainer-needed.txt
>
We already maintain such a list (along with instructions how to get
involved) here
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
>>>
>>> Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> It's been a lo
On 06/29/2014 10:03 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
>>
>> Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
>>> but
On 06/29/2014 09:12 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> It's been a long time. To be honest I don't remember masking docker
>> but I most likely did it because I was asked to mask >=lxc-1.0.0 by
>
On 06/29/2014 03:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Hi Markos,
>
> I was wondering why docker 1.0.0 wasn't seeming to get updated on my
> boxes recently, despite me commiting the update to the cvs tree, and
> Tianon noticed that it was masked at the moment:
>
> # Mar
On 06/02/2014 02:03 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>> Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages
>>> except the ones you use
On 06/01/2014 01:07 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió:
>> On 06/01/2014 12:33 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> El dom, 01-06-2014 a las 14:18 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
>>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
ntoo.devel/88183
[2] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/277054
[3]
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary.txt
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTixXHXxS
On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Indeed. I only use a subset of the dev-tools packages so those that I
>> don't use will be unmaintained in practice. I will add something to the
>> Staffing Nee
be unmaintained in practice. I will add something to the
Staffing Needs wiki page but feel free to join the herd if you have any
interest in these packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
elevant x11-*
> categories, as they are perfectly usable in other environments as
> well, tho for ease of maintenance you could stick them with the LXQt
> packages.
>
+1 (pcmanfm-qt is already in the tree in x11-misc/, libfm too etc)
Maybe it's possible to merge obconf and obconf-qt with a new 'qt' use
flag. The less duplication we do, the less time we will need to spend
maintaining the packages.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
lose to upstream.
Gentoo should be close to upstream as much as possible and developers
are actively encouraged during recruitment sessions to always try to
upstream their patches. If you think a maintainer deviated from upstream
for no good reason, well, I would like to think this is an exception
instead of common practice.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/10/2014 07:31 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 13:50 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 10 May 2014 04:34, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 05/09/2014 09:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400
>>>> Rich
in order to make the
package compatible with gentoo. Some people may consider downstream pc
files more dangerous because reverse deps are affected. But really, if
there is no other alternative, we shouldn't be treating this as a
special case. We patch upstream packages all the time after all
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 05/09/2014 09:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Fri, 09 May 2014 20:57:29 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> I was wondering, is there a good reason we keep our own pkgconfig
>> files instead of communicating that to upstream and resolve that
>> properly?
>
> Y
ve that properly?
What other distributions do? Or are we a special case and we need our
own pc files?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/26/2014 01:57 AM, Chris Reffett wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 12:22 PM, Andrew Hamilton wrote:
>> On 1/25/2014 9:24 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 11/10/2013 06:12 AM, Johann Schmitz wrote:
>>>> - gpg control packet
>>>>>> I already have too many p
ist, most of the bugs are ebuild
> related (bumps, compile and installation issues).
>
>
(picking a random email from the thread)
ping again. 3 months later, the list of bugs remain the same. Shall we
consider dropping it to maintainer-needed?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
t; documentation and not a policy manual -- policy lives in the Gentoo Developer
> Handbook.
The handbook has not been updated for a good number of years therefore I
am moving bits from it to devmanual whenever I have the time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/25/2014 01:09 PM, Chris Reffett wrote:
> On 01/25/2014 05:12 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/23/2014 04:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-01-23, o godz. 11:36:06 Chris Reffett
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
ven't looked at the implementation, but I wonder if we need a
function for such trivial stuff. Most maintainers deal with this problem
using pkg_postinst() einfo/elog messages. Why do we need a dedicated
function for that? Just for consistency reasons...?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
c/index.html
Discussing this in gentoo-dev makes no sense. Whoever wants the
profiles.desc to be part of the devmanual document, please submit a patch.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS3XuZXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1
was infra-status.
> Now with overlays using the new theme too, I've updated the list.
>
> (NB: During the outage, I added a link to the site from the g.o frontpage.)
>
>>
I haven't noticed there was a http://overlays.gentoo.org webpage.
Looks awesome :)
Thank you for the post-mortem analysis and for restoring the data
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
we could have expected that since we're diffing
> a compressed filesystem. What's important, however, is that applying
> it takes ~2.5 second on my 2 GHz Athlon64.
>
> So, even with the extra download time, the update is much faster
> than recreating the squashfs. And unlike some types of unionfs,
> it doesn't come with extra runtime slowdown.
>
> What do you think?
>
+1 I like the idea
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
yes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>
Fine by me. We will drop the rest to m-n
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
is case, either a 'parent' herd needs to
inherit the packages or simply drop them to maintainer-needed
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> Is p
Point.
> QA can do trivial fixes. Point.
>
> None of these two points needs any discussion.
>
Certainly, but look at the size and contents of this thread and now tell
me if what you said is clear to everyone. It certainly isn't to the
person who caused the problem so what I
gree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that
there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the
developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't
think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a
private discussion be better before
nfra side or its the pre-
> christmas present, the git migration.
>
> Greetings
>
maybe worth opening a bug (assuming there is no one already) or talk to
#gentoo-infra?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
t to
> change the default in the install manual to one that is being developed.
>
Can we please stop this derailed part of this thread? Please do not let
Peter render another thread useless.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
see no reason to go through the migration path
for users :) The symlink thing can be done immediately.
I am wondering, wouldn't Debian be able to rename "rc" to "openrc" in
their openrc package just before merging it to the read filesystem (I
assume Debian also builds and installs in sandbox first?)? In this case
we will not have to touch openrc (or the ebuild) at all.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ather than in the actual sources. I don't think Debian will keel over
> and die if it takes a little extra time for the change to go through,
> and it beats a ton of broken systems.
>
> Chris Reffett
>
>
+1
The ebuild can grep the inittab and it if finds an "rc" there, just
print a huge warning telling the user to migrate || die.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ed while cronie forked it
> fixing some bugs :/
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
>
If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say, then I agree we should move
away from it.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
with pambase
>> and pam_ssh
>>
>> Thanks for the info :)
>>
>>
>
So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider
merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for
a long time.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
verything :(
>
(picking up a random e-mail from the thread)
2 weeks later and the number bugs is pretty much the same. I suggest
whoever is interested in helping out to add himself to metadata given no
coordination has happened so far.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
projects to be in
the Wiki so I don't think that you are supposed to add a proj/en page
anymore just so you can redirect it to the Wiki
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
with proxy-maintainers to bring this package up
to date.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=net-analyzer%2Fnagios
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
ey have a cluster/big box for this purpose but they just didn't have
the time to deploy it properly or something.
Not everyone can afford paid solutions when it comes to contributing to
free software
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 11/02/2013 07:12 PM, yac wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 17:57:34 +
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> On 11/02/2013 05:55 PM, yac wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't think that upstream deciding to rewrite a package is good
>>> enough reason t
from
scratch.
2) It has no maintainer.
3) It has open bugs and upstream will never fix them and there is no
maintainer to patch the code to fix it properly.
So per treecleaner policy the package will be removed.
Or have you just volunteered to become maintainer and fix the bugs?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (02 Nov 2013)
# On behalf of Treecleaners
# Upstream started a complete rewrite of the package
# meaning that existing bugs will not be fixed by future
# version bumps of the existing code.
# It is unclear when/if the new code
to be against of gamerlay. We have
> got this, thanks.
>
Again, lets stop here please. I think we proved that the Gentoo dev
community as a whole is not hostile to user community overlays/projects.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
further. People can form their own opinions on
the subject.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/21/2013 02:32 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does
>> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps,
>> well, th
On 10/20/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>>> On 1
m not sure why you even open that thread. Your e-mail basically
requests the games@ team opinion. Again, if you didn't want others to
comment on this, you shouldn't have CC'd gentoo-dev.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>>>>
asterisk-moh-opsound
net-misc/asterisk-rate_engine
net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726
net-misc/asterisk
net-misc/astmanproxy
net-misc/dahdi-tools
net-misc/dahdi
net-misc/libss7
net-misc/openr2
net-misc/sipsak
The rest will end up maintainer-needed, so first comes first served :)
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
On 10/20/2013 02:45 PM, hasufell wrote:
> - gpg control packet
> After doing some tests we will probably apply this patch from bug 483304.
"probably"? Then this does not belong to the announcement list if no
final decisions have been made yet
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
>>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>
d join efforts than having
yet-another-shiny overlay.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
rkaround broken deps,
well, then you get what you deserve.
I was mostly referring to whitespaces, too long descriptions and other
non-fatal warnings that a few devs may ignore.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.
pt is there just for convenience. You shouldn't
take it too seriously and go filing bugs like crazy. The affected
packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are totally broken
but it's more like of another way to tell you that a few QA problems
exist and that it would be nice
] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, has
1 - 100 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
