On Friday 05 November 2021 00:44:11 Craig Andrews wrote:
> As previously discussed at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/21490
> we agreed that users would be kept informed via logs in the ebuilds and
> a package mask that would be lifted before the November 16 taproot
> activation date so users
From 2ca9bb266d18e35e0dd5d14149bb9aa7f9eae792 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Luke Dashjr
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:32:55 +
Subject: [PATCH] 2021-11-04-bitcoin-taproot: add news item
Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr
---
Due to the sensitive nature of changes to the Bitcoin consensus protocol[1
I'd like to reserve GID/UID 493 for system-wide Bitcoin services
(group/user name "bitcoin").
There is no standard UID number for this purpose, and other distros don't
appear to have it assigned in their lists either. 493 was just the highest
one <500 available.
Luke
On Friday, February 06, 2015 12:54:26 PM hasufell wrote:
> Luke Dashjr:
> > On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> >> Why does it not use git-r3?
> >
> > I just looked into this, and I don't see a way to get git-r3 to use the
> > same
On Friday, February 06, 2015 4:24:58 AM Jason Zaman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:46:37AM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> > On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> > > Why does it not use git-r3?
> >
> > I just looked into this, and I don't
On Friday, February 06, 2015 2:10:31 AM hasufell wrote:
> Afais the eclass is missing the safeguard, as in
I wasn't aware this was needed. Basically just wrap everything except
EXPORT_FUNCTIONS in it? I couldn't find it documented anywhere...
> Why is EAPI=5 not supported?
*Only* EAPI=5 is supp
> On 05/02/15 07:11 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
> > make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
> > that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed
> > before committing it to
