u are doing everything right...
>
Just thinking aloud - why not add some (QA?) notice in the summary when
dodoc (and possibly other do*'s) fails? One would be instructed to file
a new bug when he sees it *and*, after all, the package will have still
been merged successfuly.
Best regards,
Jurek Bartuszek
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
>> There is no need for such a switch, just add new snapshot using the long
>> _rc.
>> Once you do it you will have to keep using it until version bump,
>> e.g. (low to high):
>> 1.0_rc1
>> 1.0_rc000120070101 (newer snapshot of rc1)
>> 1.0_rc012007
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 of April 2007 00:04:35 Jurek Bartuszek wrote:
>> Hmm, is swiching from _rc2 to _rc0002 trouble-free from user's
>> POV too? Wouldn't he be forced to "update" from former to latter then?
>> It'
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:42:43 +0200
> Jurek Bartuszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> And there you have another flaw of this system - how am I supposed to
>> predict if I'll ever need the "extended" _rc versioning in case of
&g
> err. foo-0.1_rc2 < foo-0.1_rc000220070313 < foo-0.1_rc000320070512
>
> What I was trying to say is that once you change to the long versions you
> must
> stay with them.
And there you have another flaw of this system - how am I supposed to
predict if I'll ever need the "extended" _rc versioni
> that also means doing some funky $P renamings in the ebuild to catch
> upstream _rc3 tarball, but that's probably better than allowing such
> multiple suffixes.
I disagree, multiple suffixes would be much clearer to read. IMHO
renaming _rc3 to _rc0003 is an overkill. Why not simply allow
> Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this:
>
> _rc2-rMMDD
>
> Portage will update from _rc2 to a version with revision part > 0.
However, _rc2-rMMDD-r1 would *not* be valid anymore, and I think
it's quite easy to imagine when this additional -r1 would be neccessary.
Regards,
Jure
> Only a short response, as I'm a bit in a hurry right now. From
> #gentoo-council earlier:
>
> 18:25 <@robbat2> make him covert it to "_rc%04d%04d%02d%02d",$RC,$YEAR,
> $MONTH,$DAY
Let me see if I have this straight: suppose we have package foo-0.1_rc2
released (very outdated) and we're waiting
obably want
to check both of them :) and because I belong to the dotnet herd you can
find me idling around on #gentoo-dotnet. Feel free to ping me in case
you want to talk anything over :)
And no worries - I'm not gonna push on the GeNToo project whatsoever. ;>
Best regards,
Jurek Bartuszek
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
