On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules and I was
distracted, irc is not mandatory.
I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so irc is not mandatory.
I hope this clears any misunderstandings a
r view required to make sure people have a
real interest in being in this community and know enough to be able to
maintain packages (for those applying for ::gentoo access).
Best regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
PS - Let's please move all this discussion to the proj
t it relied on fingerprint of
images and time delays. To me it would make more sense to get a "console"
and grep the output for relevant strings.
I don't know if / how it evolved, so this might no longer be true.
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
rds,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-04-11, o godz. 16:50:53
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" napisał(a):
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Now if only anyone would remember what these were intended for?
Both "build" and "bootstra
automated testing.
Just the other day Magnus sent an email to this ml about a project his
working on.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Samstag, 11. April 2015, 16:19:23 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh:
build - !!internal use only!! DO NOT SET THIS FLAG YOURSELF!, used for
creating build images and the first half of bootstrapping [make
s
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Saturday 17 January 2015 14:00:34 William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 01:44:21PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Patrick Lauer
wrote:
* Stage3 archives are too fat
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug
fied as USE dependencies (maybe due to
circular deps you have to build a package with different set of USE
flags before you can build the desired USE flags in a later stage).
We build stages using a profile. One of the variables set on stage specs
is "profile" to list the profile to be
of stage3/@system and so on,
they're probably best off directing that frustration towards getting
something like mix-ins supported. :) Gentoo is about choice, but we
can only offer the choices that our tools support.
--
Rich
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
following this mailing list regularly quite sometime ago. To
see this thread is still going on and no one bothered to cc releng, to me
shows a lack of respect for the people actually doing releases around
here, as well as a real lack of interest in getting this done as you can
discuss this all you
takes
~20 seconds to build?
lu
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Gentoo Developer
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don&#
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Here's v2 of the news item.
I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with
catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don't
mind restricting the news item to , in which case
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Peter Stuge wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
+After many years of stalled development
I'm quite allergic to statements like this.
Remember that you may not really be representing everyone when you
express your own opinion - even if it is shared by many.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
Display-If-Installed: >=dev-util/catalyst-
Matt,
my plan was to show this to anyone using catalyst. I believe this news
item
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 02:14:53AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
+After many years of stalled development, the catalyst repository is
+going to have major changes introduced to master in the next few days.
?the next few days? sounds a
--- /dev/null
+++
b/2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+Title: Catalyst head changes
+Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
+Content-Type: text/plain
+Posted: 2014-01-31
+Revision: 1
+News-Item-Format: 1.0
+Display-If-Installed: dev-util/catalyst
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:56:33AM +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
Honestly, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to make stage3 less
functional than it already is but honestly net isn't something I'm ready
to give up just yet.
It isn't about ma
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote:
My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a
default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just that the
netifrc use flag on OpenRC is bogus. OpenRC doesn't need netifrc for any
reason.
William,
the "push" for the use
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 25 March 2013 09:30, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
I'll say it again: if we don't make install media anymore and
tell people to use SRCD instead, we will lose installation
support for at least alpha, pp
me/releases/auto/
[2] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352152
Thanks
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
PS - I still haven't fixed my Gentoo email setup, so I wasn't following
this
thread until someone hinted about it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This news item was committed.
On 06-09-2012 03:52, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages, I propose to
> comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This news item was committed.
On 06-09-2012 03:55, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages, I propose to
> comm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the second draft for this news item.
On 06-09-2012 03:52, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Following the July 24th thread about changing the default location
> of make.conf and make.profile in the new stages,
change and what to do. The second one (this one) is directed
to catalyst users.
This news item should be presented to all users running a version of
catalyst prior to 2.0.11.
Does anyone have any comments about this news item?
Title: Catalyst updates
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Content
sible to filter with default/linux/*, if there are other
alternatives or if we will have to list *all* relevant profiles (the
latter case is not appealing).
Does anyone have any comments about this news item?
Title: make.conf and make.profile move to /etc/portage
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-08-2012 20:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Also, we're getting rather a lot of *DEPEND variables here... If
> we're making people make major changes to their deps, which for
> HDEPEND we definitely would be, then the "it's expensive since
> peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Another user opinion...it would be a signifi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 09:29, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:07 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
>> have any comments about it?
>
> Several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 06:54, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 23-07-2012 22:10:08 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
>> wrote:
>>> This is just a heads-up for Gentoo users that got use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 08:48, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:07:59AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S.
> Vicetto wrote:
>> I've talked with both the PR and Docs team before about this
>> change. I'll try to help the doc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 00:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
> have any comments about it? The idea is to show this news item on
> all Gentoo systems. Is tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 01:33, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>>
>> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone
>> have any comments about it?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24-07-2012 00:19, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il 23/07/2012 17:07, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto:
>> from /etc to /etc/postfix.
>
> Are you really sure? I don't think Portage looks for it there ...
> ;)
Thanks Dieg
this change.
I'll try to help the docs team updating the handbook.
Title: Changes on new stages
Author: Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2012-07-27
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Starting with catalyst 2.0.10, make.conf and make.profile will be
moved from /e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-07-2012 21:09, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:03:14 +0200 Peter Stuge
> wrote:
>
>> William Hubbs wrote:
>>> let's move all of the discussion of this to the bug if possible
>>> so that it is all in one place.
>>
>> That's fine an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies for sending this twice to the gentoo-dev ml, but I forgot
to CC gentoo-dev-announce.
# Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (22 Jan 2012)
# Mask compiz for last-rites unless someone steps up
# to maintain it. Removal in 30 days.
dev-python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto (22 Jan 2012)
# Mask compiz for last-rites unless someone steps up
# to maintain it. Removal in 30 days.
dev-python/compizconfig-python
x11-apps/ccsm
x11-apps/fusion-icon
x11-apps/simple-ccsm
x11-libs/compiz-bcop
x11-libs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-11-2011 09:25, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>
> I wonder what that has to do with "Fixed slotting for
> media-libs/tiff"?
>
> Do we have a guideline or policy on using 2 spaces vs. tabs in
> .xml files and gentoo-x86? Just asking because I prefer 2 s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-11-2011 16:37, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> With bug 365121 we don't really have a working compiz in Portage
> anymore for quite a while.
>
> Anyone willing to work on bug 363321 or shall I just lastrite the
> package?
Is anyone interested in joini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-09-2011 08:11, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:01:17 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
>
>>> Attaching fixed version of the last two patches, and a
>>> complete eclass for convenience.
>>
>> Just a general comment: Is it really necess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-09-2011 12:59, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks
>> are doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files
>> whenever nece
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-09-2011 09:33, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:54:56 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan
> wrote:
>> I don't see any features in EAPI 3 and 4 that are useful for the
>> profiles. However, a bump to EAPI 2 (or at least 1) would be
>> *extrem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-08-2011 21:23, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 03:18 Fri 26 Aug , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> I've picked this message as I want to address one point in this
>> thread that was focused on this sub-thread. I disagr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-08-2011 22:06, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I have been maintaining an ebuild for Google Chrome in an overlay.
> It basically extracts a deb file to /opt. This serves as an easy
> alternative for people who do not have the patience to compile
> Chromi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-08-2011 14:35, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Rich Freeman
> wrote:
>> The big issue with opt-out is privacy law - especially in Europe
>> (that's leaving aside just being up-front with users). We'd end
>> up having to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-08-2011 08:50, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have already said this before, but it looks like nobody cared. We
> have a problem for what concerns Gentoo-generated distfiles.
>
> This includes custom snapshots, custom packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-08-2011 08:50, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Diego,
I understand the concern, but instead of banning the use of
mirror://gentoo, why not make it mandatory to have a dev.gentoo.org link
in SRC_URI when there's a mirror://gentoo link?
- --
Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-08-2011 21:56, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 03:57:30PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> Sorry, I should have been more clear here. Mounting /var doesn't
>> fill up the root partition, but if you don't want to use the
>> initram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04-08-2011 07:55, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 05:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:27:27 +0300
>> So, let's sum up a little.
>>
>> The most common argument against separate /usr requiring a proper
>> initramfs is '
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01-08-2011 08:31, Eray Aslan wrote:
> On 2011-08-01 10:23 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> that's my impression now too since nobody has managed to provide
>> useful case for separate /usr, or they have been very vague
>
> I will switch if I have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30-07-2011 22:17, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Since running separate /usr without mounting it from initramfs on
>> top of / before init is and has been broken with udev for a long
>> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09-07-2011 14:40, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 09-07-2011 a las 12:20 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> escribió:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 08-07-2011 17:00, Pacho Ramos wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09-07-2011 14:43, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 03:20 ¼¼, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>> The retirement process evolves with time and with our experience. Markos
>> linked to the last documented process, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08-07-2011 17:00, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El vie, 08-07-2011 a las 19:45 +0300, Markos Chandras escribió:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>> Good point but there is a problem. If we process the metadata.xml,
>> project pages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01-07-2011 19:33, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon,
>> correct?
>
> As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 29-06-2011 06:53, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that we have autotools.eclass to ease regenerating of autotools in
> ebuilds and people have generally adopted this tree-wide, i'd like to
> look at dropping autoconf, automake, and libtool from the sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28-06-2011 07:19, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:54, Joshua Saddler wrote:
>> This would be nice, but unfortunately the python maintainer forced
>> 3.x on everyone, despite the fact that nothing uses it and no one
>> really w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26-06-2011 12:23, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 26 June 2011 23:40, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> I think we should avoid changing the fundamental design of portage,
>> such as removing categories or allowing tags to be used as
>> dependencies/etc. At le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25-06-2011 14:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote:
>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be
>> indented? Tabs or n spaces?
>>
>
> There's no rule, but we should follow the sam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-06-2011 08:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:48:44 +
> "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
>
>
>> Is there any particular reason to create this project as a top-level
>> project? I don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
On 21-06-2011 09:43, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to announce that I've created an initial project page for
> Gentoo systemd project [1].
>
> The main purpose of that project page would be keeping docs for systemd
> users in Gentoo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-06-2011 20:48, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect
him. I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-06-2011 16:58, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 18:13:14 +0200
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 17.33 +0200, Jeroen Roovers ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Reading all this, I kept wondering how you think your self
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-06-2011 09:23, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 06/11/2011 03:36 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>> Il giorno sab, 11/06/2011 alle 01.48 +0100, Markos Chandras ha scritto:
>> Maybe I scream in private, but what you three (keeping Tomáa out of
>> this)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 15:34, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:27:04 +0300
> Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to just trust devs to use common sense in what
>> gets into ChangeLogs, and actually be grateful about if they take the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 22:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I think the problem is that we're getting a bit legalistic here. I
> have no idea why we even needed the policy change. IMHO what should
> happen is:
>
> 1. Dev does something significant and doesn't upda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-06-2011 19:50, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
> wrote:
>>
>>> So we come back to the problem being *CVS* not ChangeLog rules.
>>
>> Well of course we can just tell everyone "go look it up on
>> sou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear community,
as promised during the last council meeting, I've checked the logs and
emails for this council's election[1][2][3][4]. The nominations for this
council started at June 5th, 2010 and the members took office on July
4th, 2010. As such, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17-05-2011 00:20, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 03:15 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Let's start with generalized example so everyone gets the idea...
>>
>> Reference: man 8 pklocalauthority
>>
>> /etc/polkit-1/localauthority/10-vendor.d/exa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-05-2011 10:10, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:57:26PM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
...
>> This topic has been raised a few times in the past and as far as I can
>> recall there never was a consens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Markos.
On 12-05-2011 20:19, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quite a lot of users tend to change bugzilla fields without even
> understand why they are doing it. Would it be possible to restrict users
> from touching the following fields?
>
> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi William.
On 12-05-2011 14:34, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:01:19AM +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> On 12-05-2011 01:45, William Hubbs wrote:
>>> In my opinion, the best way t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12-05-2011 01:45, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> we received a regression for openrc which prompted me to post this to
> the list to see what everyone thinks. The bug is
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/366905.
>
> Currently, we use one variable, conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Another issue that was raised in the discussion with the arch teams,
even though it predates the arch teams resources thread as we've talked
about it on FOSDEM 2011 and even before, is getting more automatic
testing done on Gentoo.
I'm bcc'ing a
Hi.
On 18-04-2011 23:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
>
>> The mysql team now uses 3 eclasses: mysql-v2.eclass[2] (base
>> eclass), mysql-autotools.eclass[3] (for autotools based releases)
>> and mysql-cm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
On 16-04-2011 06:29, Corentin Chary wrote:
> New website is up and running at
>
> http://euscan.iksaif.net/
This site is providing interesting data and to me reinforces how much I
need to work on desktop-effects ebuilds.
However, I've found a fe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-03-2011 08:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
>> our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
>> We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
>> We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again.
On 31-01-2011 22:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Given the increased use of lzma compressed files, including on portage
> snapshots, I'd like to add app-arch/xz-utils to the system set.
> We already h
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:04:11 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Maybe we also need a guideline that whenever possible, ebuilds should
accept the default USE flags from our profiles as a valid combination?
Or, in the exceptional case when that isn't possible, a pa
or about something else?
Regards,
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
Given the increased use of lzma compressed files, including on portage
snapshots, I'd like to add app-arch/xz-utils to the system set.
We already have a few bugs about requiring xz-utils such as
347557[1] and 305127[2].
[1] - https://bugs.gen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-01-2011 11:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> On Saturday 22 January 2011 10:55:19 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> 1.
>> We EXPLICITLY need a location for private repositories.
>
> didn't know that, so i guess the private dir should be:
> private
> - in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-01-2011 03:20, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 04:38 Sat 22 Jan , Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>> Assuming we're going to move the git.overlays.gentoo.org repos there as well
>> in the near future, this is the structure i am proposing:
>>
>> source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-12-2010 10:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after approval of EAPI 4, there are now 5 different EAPIs available,
> and it's hard to remember what features are offered by which EAPI.
>
> So maybe it's about time that we deprecate EAPIs 0 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-12-2010 09:42, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:40, justin wrote:
>> we have a seperate list for helping on development of ebuild,
>> gentoo-devhelp. Please send questions like this to this list.
>
> That's good advice. You m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-12-2010 18:35, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:25:04 +
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
>> So would anyone be especially opposed to making "best leftmost" an
>> explicit requirement, enforced by repoman where possible (at least for
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Zeerak.
On 09-12-2010 23:04, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Just wondering if Gentoo will be represented at FOSDEM this year?
We will have several developers at FOSDEM, including 4 council members
and the Foundation President.
Betel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
On 03-12-2010 23:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> In the mean time I have sent the attached patch to people involved with
> building Gentoo stages. Before further taking action on/with that patch
> I am waiting for their response.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-12-2010 19:13, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
> On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>>>> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01-12-2010 03:02, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> As Arfrever noted, this is likely the cause of the broken automated
> weekly stages for this past week. By not having a python symlink /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>> There will probably be no active version of Python set.
>
> You had two weeks to come up with this.
>
> Please find my on IRC to team up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14-11-2010 18:41, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 11/14/10 8:36 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> The IA64 arch team does not have the resources to maintain Java support so we
>> agreed that support will be dropped unless more man power becomes available.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08-11-2010 11:17, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 20:51, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support.
>> We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1
>> release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04-11-2010 18:34, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 09:13 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:03:13PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> # Samuli Suominen (04 Nov 2010)
>>> # Over 20 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/2wurbtz
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02-11-2010 19:30, Markos Chandras wrote:
- - ewarn "This profile has not been tested thoroughly and is not
considered to be"
- - ewarn "a supported server profile at this time. For a supported
server"
- - ewarn "
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31-10-2010 15:31, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
> wrote:
>> As decided in the last council's meeting, following the recent
>> discussions about .la files removal, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about removing the files and profit. Please reply to this
thread if you have any comments about this point.
6. allow maintainers to work on .la files removal as th
1 - 100 of 289 matches
Mail list logo
