Hey,
app-containers/lxd and its dependency dev-libs/dqlite are up for grabs.
It just got bumped to latest version but there are few bugs open.
Overall in good state.
The two current maintainers have moved to incus and we don't use lxd at
all anymore. It's better for someone actually using it to t
On 6.11.2024 13.25, kan...@gentoo.org wrote:
> + local RUST_DEPS=()
> + RUST_DEPS+=( "|| (" )
> + for slot in "${_RUST_SLOTS[@]}"; do
> + if [[ -n ${usedep} ]]; then
> + RUST_DEPS+=( "dev-lang/rust:${slot}[${usedep}]
> dev-lang/rust-bin:${slot}[${usedep}
Hey,
the following packages are up for grabs:
app-misc/rdfind
dev-libs/libxdg-basedir
games-simulation/simutrans-paksets
games-simulation/simutrans
media-gfx/viewnior
www-apps/hugo
Hugo is waiting for a stabilization, simutrans has a minor update
available and there are test-related bugs open. L
Hey,
net-p2p/nicotine+ is up for grabs. 1 bug open, version bump available.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
On 18.8.2024 22.06, Sam James wrote:
>
> Thoughts on prefix/suffix?
>
> "test-install", "test-install-files" are more in-keeping with USE=test,
> USE=test-full, etc, but maybe that's *bad* because it's not related
> at all to what the ebuild does, so we should do install-* like you've
> sug
Hey,
On 9.8.2024 18.40, Sam James wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some packages like libffi, gcc support extended, slower versions of
> their testsuites. In the past, I've seen both USE="expensive-tests" (I
> think) and USE="test-full" (used in a few places in-tree atm) for this.
>
> I sort of hate both sugges
Hey,
On 9.8.2024 18.43, Sam James wrote:
>
> I'd like to pick some name which is suitable for us to use elsewhere and
> it's not really a package-specific issue. Thoughts?
>
the first simple thought that came to my mind: "install-tests" or
"install-test-files". Both are available and should be
Hey,
the following packages are up-for-grabs:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-fs/mount-zip
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-fs/rar2fs
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
On 11.4.2024 9.14, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> The latter can certainly be done and makes sense (only required if
> you're using the fuse mount, so if USE=fuse at least).
>
> The former doesn't make sense to do blindly in /etc/init.d/netmount
> (which belongs to sys-apps/openrc, not glusterfs).
>
On 6.4.2024 14.57, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
> --- /usr/portage/net-mail/dovecot/dovecot-2.3.21-r1.ebuild
> +++ /usr/local/portage/net-mail/dovecot/dovecot-2.3.21-r1.ebuild
> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@
>
> DEPEND="
> app-arch/bzip2
> - app-arch/xz-utils
> dev-libs/icu:=
> dev-l
On 8.4.2024 12.51, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> In order for glusterfs to mount successfully the fuse module needs to be
> available when mount.glusterfs is invoked. This can be achieved in one
> of two ways:
>
> 1. Compile the module statically into the kernel.
> 2. Arrange for fuse service to be st
On 1.4.2024 23.07, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> That's not stupid at all, I'd been thinking exactly the same thing. I raised
> this whole issue during a discussion at FOSDEM 2019, where I admitted that I
> didn't check the code changes for packages I was bumping, knowing that few to
> none of the ot
app-admin/ananicy up for grabs.
It's currently in good shape.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
media-gfx/iscan is up for grabs. Has few bugs open, pending
stabilization and nothing critical with pkgcheck.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The webpage it was built to scrape isn't online anymore. Removal in ~30
days. Bug #924007
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
### Notes: Tried to keep this news item as concise as possible,
### more information in #920527.
Title: LXD to lose access for its image server
Author: Joonas Niilola
Posted: 2023-12-28
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: app-containers/lxd
Earlier this year Canonical took
On 20.10.2023 10.38, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> Upstream is totally abandoned with no updates for 2 years. The situation
> has spawned multiple forks and there are different maintained
> alternatives available now in Gentoo's repository. To list a few:
> fastfetch, hyfetch, screenfet
On 20.10.2023 15.30, Pascal Jaeger wrote:
>
> This is only two years without a release. We have packages way way older
> than that.
> I know fetch scripts have a reputation, but this thing is kind
> of a staple in the community and it is still widely used.
>
> I can jump in as a proxy maintainer
Upstream is totally abandoned with no updates for 2 years. The situation
has spawned multiple forks and there are different maintained
alternatives available now in Gentoo's repository. To list a few:
fastfetch, hyfetch, screenfetch
If you're aware of more/better alternatives, please add them to t
Hey,
due to a retirement of a proxied maintainer, the following packages are
up for grabs:
app-portage/gentle
dev-python/insipid-sphinx-theme
net-libs/libomemo-c
Gentle has 3 bugs open, otherwise all in good shape.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Enigmail's functionality has been built into Thunderbird-68, carrying
over all the way to 115. Enigmail hasn't been supported in TB since 91.
It's currently only supported on SeaMonkey, but upstream provides a
pre-packed extension to download for SM directly. Therefore there's not
much reason to pa
DAHDI is not suited for a rolling-release distribution. Upstream
releases new versions sporadically and it may take multiple years
between them. Old versions are constantly broken with newer kernels,
requiring heavy patching downstream. Has no active maintainer in Gentoo.
If you use DAHDI and have
Hey,
app-mobilephone/heimdall is up for grabs. It's up to date, no bugs open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
MATE desktop project is being disbanded due to no joining. At least now
someone will get notified when a Github PR is made (not for bugs
though). It seems like packages are bumped to latest major version, but
minor version bumps are missing (1.26.0+). ~30 bugs open.
Packages up for grabs:
ap
On 11.8.2023 17.07, orbea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the Gentoo Github PR queue is at 577 open PRs that even
> includes one that has been left open in 2018 and neglected since 2021.
That's a bit misleading. The PR in question is opened by a Gentoo
developer, and labeled as "do-not-merge". So mayb
Hey,
app-admin/kpcli is up for grabs. Finally migrated to pass. It's up to
date and has one bug open about copying passwords to clipboard, which I
believe is a bug in urxvt because it works for me on other terms.
There's a huge release 4.0 in the making and will probably be out soon,
but currentl
On 7.7.2023 12.55, Zurab Kvachadze wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new here, so I'm sorry in advance for any stupid thing I may say. I
> want to adopt hunspell for various reasons and what I've noticed is a
> plethora of app-dicts/myspell-* packages (for each language there's one).
>
> I sugges
Hey,
these packages are up for grabs:
dev-db/mycli
dev-libs/judy
dev-util/imediff2
lxde-base/lxdm
mail-client/s-nail
mail-filter/amavisd-milter
net-misc/omnisync
sys-power/acpilight
They're in pretty good state. lxdm has bunch of bugs open, some others
were eligible for python-3.12 compatibility
On 8.6.2023 13.08, Alexe Stefan wrote:
> Can you build firefox/librewolf with gcc?
> Afaik, you can only build it with clang/llvm.
> Librewolf if the only reason I have clang and llvm on my system.
>
> joi, 8 iun. 2023, 10:31 Joonas Niilola <mailto:juip...@gentoo.org>> a
On 8.6.2023 1.11, Alexe Stefan wrote:
>
> Also, with all this discussion, one can't help but wonder, is
> firefox/librewolf also in such danger?
>
>
Maintaining Firefox shares many of the bullet points mentioned above. We
used to provide alpha/beta builds so issues would be caught early and
rep
On 2.6.2023 21.06, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> In theory it's "easy", but in practice how'd you work? This would be
>> fine when a single developer is proxying a single maintainer, but when a
>> a stack of devs (project) are proxying hundreds of different people, it
>> becomes messy and unsustainabl
On 1.6.2023 22.55, William Hubbs wrote:
>>
>> The EGO_SUM alternatives
>> - do not have the same level of trust and therefore have a negative
>> impact on security (a dubious tarball someone put somewhere, especially
>> when proxy-maint)
>
> For this, I would argue that vetting the tarball falls
Hey,
the following packages are up for grabs:
acct-group/freenet
acct-user/freenet
dev-java/jbitcollider-core
net-libs/NativeThread
net-p2p/fms
net-p2p/freenet
They are in pretty good condition. net-p2p/freenet needs a version bump,
has few bugs open and some pkgcheck QA issues.
-- juippis
Ope
Hey,
net-vpn/networkmanager-fortisslvpn is up for grabs due to the previous
proxied maintainer not using this package anymore. It currently has one
bug open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
the following packages are up for grabs:
sys-kernel/pf-sources
sys-process/uksmd
Both need a version bump. uksmd has no releases so tag the latest commit
and package a snapshot version. pf-sources's ebuild should be documented
well-enough for anyone to understand how it works.
After dealing
On 14.4.2023 9.50, Andrey Grozin wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> Yesterday I upgraded a large number of packages (but not including
> openrc). After that all openrc messages look very strange. Many (null),
> colors are weird. Don't know which specific upgrade has led to this
> effect. This includes system b
On 25.2.2023 8.05, Michał Górny wrote:
> # Michał Górny (2023-02-25)
> # Unmaintained. The Gentoo version is from 2018 and needs bumping.
> # It has a build failure reported.
> # Removal on 2023-03-27. Bug #649234.
> media-gfx/frogr
>
This got saved.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description
media-libs/libiptcdata is up for grabs. It's a dependency of
app-misc/tracker-miners and media-gfx/rawtherapee.
Has two bugs open: test failure and python-3.11 compatibility bump.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package up for grabs: net-vpn/networkmanager-l2tp
No bugs open, bumped to latest version today.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 14.12.2022 22.20, Marco Scardovi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm gonna propose to l-r these packages as both are dead upstream and on
> our side
>
> # Marco Scardovi (2022-12-14)
> # We are literally the only distro that still have
> # an installation option for that package.
> # It still uses
On 13.12.2022 0.26, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
> On 12/12/2022 23.06, Sam James wrote:
>> It's unusual to have discussion about a single package on the mailing
>> lists. I tend to keep an eye on PAM
>> bugs because I maintained pambase.
>>
>> Bugs are the primary method of discussing changes to package
No more consumers in tree. Removal in ~30 days unless some rdep needs
returning - in which case let's not remove it all yet!
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
dev-python/influxdb is up for grabs. No open bugs, no available version
releases, but pkgcheck reports:
dev-python/influxdb
DeprecatedDep: version 5.3.0-r1: BDEPEND: deprecated dependency:
>=dev-python/nose-1.3.7_p2021_p1-r1[python_targets_python3_10(-)?,python_targets_python3_8(-)?,python_t
Hey,
these packages are up for grabs:
dev-util/bitrise
dev-util/stepman
dev-util/envman
All of them are several versions behind (3+ years worth of updates), use
old go eclasses (need to migrate to go-module) and most likely don't
have all licenses listed in LICENSE field (since it's go).
-- juip
On 8.11.2022 2.23, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Of course if somebody wants to contribute to 100% FOSS tinderbox
> efforts that would be even better. Perhaps if our 100% FOSS tinderbox
> efforts addressed our needs very well, then nobody would want to
> bother with the proprietary reports, or generati
On 7.11.2022 8.07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
>> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually
>> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you
>> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugz
On 6.11.2022 11.49, Martin Dummer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I
> will continue to do so.
>
> Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC:
> "Trusted contributor model"?
>
> Meanwhile I continue to wait for an ans
Hey all,
with the only member of VDR project gone, the project is currently
essentially empty.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:VDR
Please join the project to keep it alive. We may have some help through
the proxy-maint project, but someone with immediate commit access is
always better.
If
Hey,
dropped Mozilla project as jemalloc's maintainer. No Mozilla product
depends on it. Looks like it's used by (web) server software mostly. No
bugs open, no pending stabilizations, no version bumps available, so
it's in good state right now.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
This flat theme has been incorporated to upstream's enlightenment-0.25
release. With e-0.24 removed from the tree, this theme ebuild is useless.
Removal in 30 days. Bug #870355
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Upstream split this font into separate packages: media-fonts/
# source-code-pro, source-sans, source-serif. The current non-split
# version is broken. Removal in 30 days. #865103
Tree should be handled so there's no inconvenience unless the font is in
your @world set.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signa
Hey,
www-servers/lighttpd is up for grabs. Looks like a version bump is
pending (and offered as PR#20900). No other bugs open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 5.8.2022 6.31, Matthew Marchese wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Wanted to document a public service announcement for minor wiki
> enhancements:
>
> 1. "Fund me" links are now available on the wiki developer 'profile'
> boxes. You can post a free-form URL to your GitHub Sponsor, Patreon,
> PayPal or anoth
Hey,
these packages are up for grabs:
app-text/scdoc
dev-libs/light
gui-apps/grim
gui-apps/kanshi
gui-apps/slurp
net-fs/sshfs
www-apps/jekyll-watch
gui-libs/wlroots
The usual set. Some outdated, most waiting for stabilizations and
cleanups, some have bugs open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Des
Hey,
these packages are up for grabs:
x11-misc/urxvt-perls
x11-misc/urxvt-tabbedex
Just realized I don't have urxvt installed anymore anywhere (was a
backup terminal for a long time).
x11-misc/urxvt-perls:
upstream has archived their repo, not sure if a new upstream has emerged
somewhere or
Hey,
these packages are up for grabs:
app-crypt/acme-tiny
dev-util/patchbin
games-strategy/freeorion
gui-libs/gtk-layer-shell
net-libs/libcapi
net-libs/libmicrodns
sys-apps/duc
x11-misc/primus
app-eselect/eselect-wine
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 22.7.2022 21.32, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> BUT, we can't write a simple gitolite ACL that limits the content within
> profiles/package.mask or other files in profiles/ (we can write hooks
> that might be able to do this, but that still requires the challenge of
> validation inside the file).
On 22.7.2022 21.18, Matt Turner wrote:
>
> How would you suggest we track who has commit access, etc? The same
> way we do with developers, via a developer bug?
>
> I ask because I've noticed a lot of inactive proxied maintainers—one
> of which had been listed in metadata.xml for 6 years but had
On 22.7.2022 16.48, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> Since the ip connection here isn't too good, is there some way I
> can download the devmanual, perhaps as a pdf ?
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/
>
> Regards,
> /Karl Hammar
>
>
>
emerge =app-doc/devmanual- with "+offline" USE flag, then
Cross-posting to gentoo-dev and -project lists due to technical and
non-technical nature. Reply-to is set to -project.
Once again new council has been elected: congratulations to the chosen
members! And once again many nominees expressed their wishes to see more
non-developer contributors to becom
On 16.7.2022 14.24, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> That reads as if you wrote it under the assumption that we can only
> either use dependency tarballs or use EGO_SUM. At the same time, I have
> not seen an argument why we can not simply do *both*.
>
> EGO_SUM has numerous advantages over dependency
On 7/6/22 18:04, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> - please do not needlessly change style: if you do not "maintain" the
> ebuild, respect the style of the maintainer, so only add the changes
> you need, keep it minimal, respect the original even though you don't
> like it (and don't use QA as an excus
Packages up for grabs:
acct-group/crontab
acct-group/gkrellmd
acct-group/icecast
acct-group/lightdm
acct-group/msmtpd
acct-group/murmur
acct-group/nsd
acct-group/pdnsd
acct-group/roccat
acct-group/uptimed
acct-group/vboxguest
acct-group/vboxsf
acct-group/vboxusers
acct-user/gkrellmd
acct-user/iceca
Full list:
acct-group/collectd
acct-group/fritzbox_smarthome_exporter
acct-group/mysqld_exporter
acct-group/nginx
acct-group/sabnzbd
acct-user/collectd
acct-user/fritzbox_smarthome_exporter
acct-user/mysqld_exporter
acct-user/nginx
acct-user/sabnzbd
app-admin/cli53
app-admin/rsyslog
app-arch/rar
ap
On 3.6.2022 17.45, Maciej Barć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd like to introduce "pandoc" virtual package depending on pandoc-bin
> or pandoc.
>
> Pandoc is a very helpful tool for converting between document formats,
> most commonly used to build a project documentation, but it depends on
> many Haskell
On 18.4.2022 7.47, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> Of course I forgot to mention the devbox situation... The single box I
> currently use is placed in my company, so I probably wouldn't be able to
> share it. I have ordered another board though, so I'll be able to
> provision it as a devbox after receiving it
On 15.4.2022 4.38, John Helmert III wrote:
> Hi all! Currently all security bugs are assigned to security@g.o,
> always. This can easily lead to some confusion about who needs to do
> something about a given bug; right now this is generally tracked by
> whiteboard magic strings that probably not ma
On 18.4.2022 20.59, Sam James wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sam James
> ---
> eclass/edo.eclass | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/edo.eclass b/eclass/edo.eclass
> index 550d6770cb63..c2e7ed60083f 100644
> --- a/eclass/edo.eclass
> +++ b/eclass/edo.e
Hey,
with the retirement of chainsaw, projects ALSA and VoIP are left
memberless. It looks like VoIPs' packages are assigned long time ago, so
the project will most likely just be disbanded. But ALSA is still
maintaining packages in the tree.
https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/alsa-b...@gentoo
Hey,
these packages are ups for grabs after a retirement of a proxied maintainer.
app-admin/prelude-manager
dev-libs/libprelude
dev-libs/libpreludedb
net-analyzer/prelude-correlator
net-analyzer/prelude-lml
net-analyzer/prelude-lml-rules
www-apps/prewikka
pkgcheck reports:
app-admin/prelude-mana
On 14.2.2022 19.37, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> These functions write to ${T}/eclass-debug.log, which is useful for
> testing ebuilds.
>
>
>
Acked by graaff and merged yesterday after some testing. Thanks!
As a sidenote, these ruby eclasses received 5 commits yesterday so if
something breaks now it
On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote:
> I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman. I believe that
> dev-util/pkgcheck and pkgcommit (from app-portage/mgorny-dev-scripts)
> are far superior replacements, and it makes sense to have people using
> the same tool and seeing the same warnings a
On 4.3.2022 2.35, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 02:21:22PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>> I'd argue we can add NOTES.md to packages (e.g. allow those files.)
>> Then we modify packages.gentoo.org to render the markdown; or users
>> can render locally or read unrendered.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
On 11.2.2022 1.36, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you may have noticed, I'm practically maintaining LLVM all by myself.
> This is a really tedious, time consuming and ungrateful task, and I'm
> pretty close to burnout. I'd really appreciate some help.
>
> The problem with LLVM that it's a real
Hey,
app-dicts/verbiste is available due to retirement of its maintainer. Has
currently 3 bugs open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29.1.2022 19.51, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 07.49, Joonas Niilola wrote:
>> On 24.1.2022 20.37, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> Hi Joonas,
>
>>> I think it is time to unmask the currently masked Bitcoin versions. The
>>> mask was added in Juli
See topic. No bugs open.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 24.1.2022 20.37, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> I think it is time to unmask the currently masked Bitcoin versions. The
> mask was added in Juli of 2021 [1], with the mask's commit message
> indicating that unmasking is planned for November 2021.
>
> I doubt that the mask was ever needed in the first
Hey,
# Seamonkey
Seamonkey is currently being neglected in Gentoo as no one in the
mozilla project care or has time for it. The currently packaged versions
won't build with newer non-vulnerable rust, and therefore seamonkey is
currently blocking a (security) cleanup for rust. It needs a dedicated
On 20.1.2022 23.32, Brian Evans wrote:
>
> GNOME and Mozilla products still pull in spidermonkey but other users
> will have a much reduced requirement for rust.
>
While Firefox and Thunderbird contain a js engine, no mozilla product
depends externally on spidermonkey. I was wondering recently w
On 18.1.2022 4.58, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>
> Unsure what I like best, I generally agree should default to sources
> but I do see new users complaining about building rust every few days.
> Not that the step of telling them that rust-bin exists is that bad
> (part of the issue is that they don't kno
On 8.1.2022 7.12, Sam James wrote:
>
> FWIW, normally we don't post individual package patches
> to this ML, but it's a good question as to.. where they should go
> if people want to use git send-email/a ML workflow.
>
> Right now, sometimes people send them to gentoo-proxy-maint
> (the list) whi
On 18.12.2021 12.02, Alexey Sokolov wrote:
>
> Lars, can you merge https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/23209 ?
>
Done, please take of the bugs. Especially the security bug.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 13.12.2021 23.12, Jonas Licht wrote:
> So nearly ten months have now gone by.
> Is there any thing I can do to push this changes to get merged?
>
> Best regards,
> Jonas
Unfortunately I don't think anyone other than the current nginx
maintainer is brave enough to get involved. For an outsider
On 15.12.2021 15.18, geaaru wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i'm sorry but i haven't sufficient time to support and follow the
> package net-dialup/freeradius and the others packages maintained by me.
>
> I hope that someone could take care of them.
>
> Best Regards,
> -- geaaru
Thanks for your work! You'
# Outdated, we are the only one who still have a package for it.
# Docker can mount these NFS, AWS EFS, Ceph & Samba/CIFS volumes
# by itself now. Removal in 30 days. Bug #829068
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 25.11.2021 22.54, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
> ---
> ...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 45 +++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-
On 25.11.2021 16.15, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> why do you want to drop the package? Since news item, upstream changed.
> There will be a new release soon. Was this just on your list to finish
> or is there another reason?
>
> I am currently watching upstream and would wait to see if the
On 25.11.2021 15.37, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> For the records:
For the records:
This post could've been an attempt to get it merged faster. But no, you
chose to prolong it even further.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 20.11.2021 0.32, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> in the spirit of our "2020 in retrospect & happy new year 2021!" front page
> article,
>
> https://www.gentoo.org/news/2021/01/15/new-year.html
>
> which was rather well received, I'd already like to start collecting news
> from 20
Hey,
the following are up for grabs:
acct-group/greetd
acct-user/greetd
app-emulation/virtio-win
app-shells/loksh
dev-lang/zig
dev-libs/aml
dev-libs/libucl
dev-python/python-evdev
gui-apps/gtkgreet
gui-apps/lavalauncher
gui-apps/tuigreet
gui-apps/wayland-logout
gui-apps/waypipe
gui-apps/wayvnc
gu
On 11.11.2021 13.34, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 11/11/2021 11.59, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> We could:
>>
>> - Open some part of the range between 500 and 1000. For example,
>> 500..799, which would leave 200 IDs for dynamic allocation.
>
> +1, since I am not aware of any significant downsides d
On 27.10.2021 18.19, John Helmert III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:53:10AM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Anna Vyalkova
>> ---
>> Related to this version bump and unmask:
>> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/message/d86352b4ebad8c4ddd14fcd8ce37162f
>>
>> ...27-u
Hey,
due to inactivity these packages have been reassigned:
hd_brummy:
dev-libs/tntnet
www-misc/xxv - EAPI-5 & other ebuild quality standards
Note that the Gentoo VDR Project is basically inactive as well.
https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/v...@gentoo.org
nerdboy:
app-misc/vit
dev-python/pd
On 15.10.2021 9.33, Oskari Pirhonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent a pull request to upstream earlier this year to fix a PAM related
> issue (see also: Gentoo bug #774729), but the repo has since been
> archived [1]. Looking at the commit history, I see that there's only
> been a single upstream commit s
On 14.10.2021 20.10, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-10-14 at 15:40 +0200, Marek Szuba wrote:
>> Dear everyone,
>>
>> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it
>> would both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of
>> limited manpower more efficien
On 11.10.2021 2.05, Petru Ciobanu wrote:
> I'm using net-vpn/openfortivpn almost everyday and I would like to start
> contributing to Gentoo. If possible, I would not mind to start looking
> after it, alone or to co-maintain it with someone who knows more
> about maintaining a package. Also, I woul
# Development stopped by upstream. Switch to its actively developed
# fork, x11-misc/picom. Bug #817338. Removal in ~30 days.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
LiveOnlyPackage with no maintainer. Upstream has multiple releases.
Please become the maintainer and make a versioned ebuild for an upstream
release. Bug #817320. Removal in ~30 days.
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey,
due to inactivity the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-admin/calamares
app-admin/profile-cleaner
app-crypt/zulucrypt
app-doc/zsh-lovers
app-misc/screenfetch
dev-cpp/websocketpp
dev-libs/qtkeychain
dev-vcs/gti
media-sound/lollypop
net-im/discord-bin
net-misc/sshpass
net-vpn/openfor
1 - 100 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
