On 8.11.2022 2.23, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Of course if somebody wants to contribute to 100% FOSS tinderbox > efforts that would be even better. Perhaps if our 100% FOSS tinderbox > efforts addressed our needs very well, then nobody would want to > bother with the proprietary reports, or generating them. IMO it would > be better to create the FOSS solution before abandoning the > proprietary one. Doing otherwise is basically burning bridges - it > can be motivating in a sense but not really ideal. I'd love to have a > 100% FOSS solution around all of this, but I appreciate what has been > created and can hardly criticize volunteers for failing to make it > happen, especially since I haven't contributed to that myself. >
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/tinderbox-cluster.git/ https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Tinderbox-cluster Hopefully soon. -- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
