Don't break stuff. If you're sure you
know what you're doing, and you're not going to break stuff, then do
what needs to be done.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
web: http://www.grantgoodyear.org
e-mail: gr...@grantgoodyear.org
AIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-announce?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~----~------~--~---
- End forwarded message -
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Finge
ur students accomplished last year? I doubt there are many,
despite the fact that some good work was done last year.
Thoughts? Comments?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7
r program is only intended to allow users to have two MTAs
_installed_ on the same box, not actually have them both running
simultaneously. It works pretty well for that, but I agree that there
seems to be little real need for it. I have no objection to it going
away.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant
hat the meeting was moved to the 16th, to
avoid conflicting with LWE. No?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgp0yRFAewfZN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e-up on my
blog detailing what we know so far:
http://www.grantgoodyear.org/g2blog/gentoo/20070717-sflc.html
I'm cross-posting to -dev, and suggesting that comments be sent
there as well, since most people don't read -nfp.
If you think this is a good idea, a bad idea, or you just wan
oject instead of -dev, so I don't see that it's going
to affect me very much.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpiSvLESccDC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as supposed to
be a proctor directive.) Or are people really looking for the proctors
to get involved only when behavior is particularly egregious? Is there
a way to fix the current system, or should it be chucked entirely, as
has been suggested?
Well reasoned thoughts and opinions welc
eeBSD but
using glibc be called? (It's not an entirely academic question;
Debian folks have worked on such a distribution for some time.)
I can't really tell from the text in your proposed GLEP.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boo
on what you
think you know. Here's an example: "That last paragraph doesn't seem to
agree with what I've observed, where Could you explain where the
discrepancy arises?"
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2b
ncil is wrong,
then the Council is extremely likely to listen. If they don't, vote
out the bums.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgppKgEGeE8NE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e system". The
reason we give such sweeping CVS privs is precisely so that people can
fix broken packages. Just don't break anything when you do it. If you
do, then you deserve to have the council thump you.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gent
relying on freenode as our sole IRC host, since freenode would
certainly count as a single vendor.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpigXWRG4cU1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Sat Mar 24 2007, 11:38:45AM CDT]
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:30:55 -0700
> Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > PS. So, anybody have any actual technical comments about this
> > > propos
rong, obviously-Gentoo-specific proposals, I suspect
they'll push the less-Gentoo-specific proposals right off the acceptance
list, unless those alternative proposals are amazingly impressive.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
G
proposal?
My personal opinion is that I wouldn't characterize it as a
high-priority project for either Gentoo or Paludis, but the
quality of the proposal itself is decent and real thought has been
put into it. (I can't figure out why this project would need both
boost.
Forwarding on behalf of Diego.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:46:24 -0500
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ld be useful
to the broader community?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpO7B3VQJftY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t
the rest of the community doesn't have to deal with him, then I'm
going to be perfectly happy with that arrangement.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
difference lies? Are we sure that we're solving the right
problem? (That's not a rhetorical question; I really don't know the
answer.)
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC
Robin H. Johnson wrote: [Tue Mar 13 2007, 06:05:10PM CDT]
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:53PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > * Can we find a better name than "the Proctors", please?
> > Yes, that's a completely petty point, but it was the first
> >
way or another.
Despite how critical I'm being, I really do appreciate the work that
has gone into this so far. Thank you very much.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpC9y5kFBjPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this technically, instead of /politically/ *shock horror*..
[rest snipped]
Please, stop.
This thread has mostly died out, and it would be nice not to fan the
flames again.
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D70
pon, and accepted in part, in
whole, or not at all by the Council. If they take too long, or their
work is too paludis-biased, or if people just don't trust the authors,
then nothing is preventing anybody else from writing a competing spec.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAI
Josh Saddler wrote: [Mon Mar 05 2007, 03:51:08PM CST]
> Technical point here -- the devmanual has never been in GuideXML; it was
> converted from RST into docbook.
Oh! My apologies.
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2booj
ith that approach, though: right now
it is not clear that Gentoo has a group of devs who are sufficiently
trusted and willing to actually punish incivility. Thoughts?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgplxaHmQNCxk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ought would satisfy the license) where the full list of authors would
be listed on the front page as a simple, compact list of names. The
appendix would still detail which author wrote what. That's what you'll
see on the current devmanual, and as far as I know everybody involved is
con
s last year.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpDzvNrd3h9Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ojects that at least have the potential to benefit more of the
community than just Gentoo. *Shrug*
Assuming we decide to be a mentoring organization again, I'm willing to
help with the paperwork and administrative stuff.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
http://google-code-updates.blogspot.com/2007/02/speaking-of-summer.html
So, are we going to want to participate again this year?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
evs that maintain those packages are understandably
touchy about having other devs break those ebuilds. For the majority of
packages in the tree, though, I'd like to encourage their maintainers to
be less possessive. If somebody wants to fix bugs in ebuilds that I
maintain, go right ahead. Jus
eas, it may be that a not-so-good one will need to be enacted
by fiat.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgp0vUValY5Wz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Tue Jan 30 2007, 12:27:49AM CST]
> * Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
Agreed. Worse, it's a stop-gap measure, since presumably the long term
solution is for tr1 to be supported directly by the compiler on all
archs. So, any work done with this approach w
l
election to a Council position because only a handful of people ran for
the position.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgphDsgw6xilV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
v.gentoo.org/~klieber/spf.txt
Thanks, that's quite helpful.
What did you do (or not do) to avoid paying the SPF_NEUTRAL SA "penalty"
in your test e-mail sent using gmail?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerp
mails to -dev since 21
Oct., and in each one I see the following sig:
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web : http://ciaranm.org/
as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13
Where has he used "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on -dev it appeared that infra was
essentially saying "We know best, we're not changing how we do things,
and we don't want to talk about it". If that appearance were, in fact,
the reality, then appealing to the Council would seem to be perfectly
reasonable.
-g2boojum-
--
Gra
make it easy for our
users to create and use their own, customized, distribution. That's our
strength as a meta-distribution. (We also need to make it easy to
install and replicate custom distributions, but we already have Catalyst
and the Seeds project addressing those issues.)
-g2booju
> The simplest way is a line based format
> ...
At the risk of reopening a large can of worms, can somebody explain to
me why the license groups idea won't run into the same conceptual issues
that derailed GLEP 29 (USE groups)? Am I missing something obvious?
-g2boojum-
-
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Wed Oct 25 2006, 11:17:09AM CDT]
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:48:57 -0500 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | (Incidentally, I apologize for missing the meeting. I was in
> | intensely boring radiation safety training.)
>
> Uh, isn'
e extreme there. For the previous and current changes to
GLEP 39 the changes are much smaller, and I'd rather see the changes
done inline. *Shrug* It's a slippery slope, but I'd rather rely on
common sense until there's actual evidence that it's failing.
-g2booju
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Mon Oct 23 2006, 04:35:50PM CDT]
> To my fellow Gentoo Devlopers and Users,
[lots snipped]
Truly, the sarcasm doesn't help. It takes a potentially reasonable
grievance and reduces it to just the author appearing to be a jerk.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Grant Goodyear wrote: [Mon Oct 23 2006, 09:50:02AM CDT]
> *Sigh* Unfortunately, the bylaws have yet to be approved (mainly
> because the quorum requirements would kill us). Thus, there is no
> well-defined path. The options are:
>
> (1) Follow the bylaws, and the remaining trust
ready have the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for business that doesn't
have to be kept private, and -nfp tends to be quite low-noise. For
stuff that we have to keep private, we're more likely to use the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] alias than the mailing list, anyway, although I'd like to
see
list of eligible voters for
the current election, and codergeek42, fmccor, and gustavoz, who are
the other election officials (and who, presumably, will be providing
independent confirmations of the election results).
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Attached.
Thanks to all who voted!
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
agaffney
agriffis
amne
anpereir
astinus
axxo
azarah
bass
batlogg
bcowan
beejay
bennyc
in a ballot that caused it not to be counted, so hopefully
this process will help reduce the number of similar errors.
Best,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6
As I write this, it's 17:42 UTC, and the polls close at some microsecond
before 00:00 UTC. If you haven't voted and you wish to be a member of
the Gentoo Foundation (and you're eligible), please do so.
Best regards,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL
but it does, at least, make things look less
malicious.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgphTaOx3hQoG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;ll do 'blah' w/ the new CD, could somebody let me know
the best way to do this", I suspect that everybody would be happier.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpc4H0PoXf44.pgp
Description: PGP signature
willing to actually do the work?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpsMeys9oGRL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ately it is developer self-interest that keeps things
going.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpzB2b6XFdtf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e out of it will be supported by the community
as a whole. If we need to change things to make that reality more clear, I'm
certainly willing to listen to suggestions.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpFHSWMM48ya.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ive.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpUBNQWaNjZP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Wernfried Haas wrote: [Mon Sep 11 2006, 11:23:03AM CDT]
> I'd like to send my unofficial congratulations to the new council then.
> Also thanks to the folks who did the technical stuff behind the vote.
>
> Btw, how many people actually voted?
121
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
esult: option jakub wins
result: option spb wins
result: option patrick wins
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpYOj1W4APDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
27;ll be using the same master ballot that
I just mailed out, as that's all that is needed, so if anybody else
wants to provide an independent count, feel free.)
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663
Here's the "master ballot" for the election. Confirmation e-mails will
follow.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
- confirmation 2b94 -
ing), and then requiring in-tree package
managers to implement that API. Or at least that was my understanding
of that meeting.
Thanks!
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpFSsnN2ZzQr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
owever, I just took on that role with a view to getting
> things moving again, so given that the GLEP is more a statement of
> intent than something to be implemented I would say it can probably be
> marked final at some point.
Marked final.
Thanks,
g2boojum
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Dev
I hadn't
looked at the actual GLEP. Updated in CVS.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpgBo5yLD4Xl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
't remember what happened w/ this one
49 (alt package manager 1) --> R (by council; sane API preferred)
50 (alt package manager 2) --> R (by council; sane API preferred)
51 (knowledge base) --> GDP want to approve this one so I can change
the code?
e the user could just mask out /etc/logrotate.d
instead (using INSTALL_MASK) if those scripts weren't desired.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpGeOfoXqVF7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that sets Gentoo
apart. My guess is that it also makes Gentoo devs less willing
to pigeon-hole themselves into a rigid project structure, but I don't
really have any evidence of that.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Finger
Greg KH wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:42:47PM CDT]
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
> > but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
> >
Olivier Crete wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 11:42:14AM CDT]
> On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for voting
> software ?
Well, fmccor has suggested STV[1], so the current plan is to use
"countify&quo
Christel Doty wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:34:50PM CDT]
> Sure, just let me know what you need me to do Grant :)
Thanks! Um, I'm not quite sure what's going to be needed just yet,
but I'll keep you informed.
-g2boojum-
PS. With three election officials, we probably have eno
If you run
into any problems, please let me know. All current devs are eligible to
vote.
Incidentally, I'm currently serving as an election official since I'm
not running for a spot on the Council. It would be good to have a
couple other people acting as officials, too. Volunteers?
-g2booju
tee again, which is more
than enough administrative annoyance all by itself.)
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpovh6Vp5JnS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
es and then create local accounts
with those values. Anybody who actually has a clue want to chime in?
Oh, it might be a good idea to ask in [EMAIL PROTECTED], too.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint:
at people are likely to
install outside of portage, the kernel would be it.)
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpong75Uwgt9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
l-knowing Zen argument isn't
particularly helpful
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpa5qAbFbRMh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
entoo.org address and add a portage hook that warns whenever the
project sunrise overlay is used, then our reputation isn't really likely
to suffer even if it's a complete disaster.
So, Chris, what have I failed to address that would make this a really
bad idea?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant
So, what would people think of moving herds.xml from gentoo/misc into
the portage tree, with the rationale being that local tools could use
that information for various useful purposes (compiling statistics,
doing something that I can't think of right now, whatever)?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goo
, I'd think that would make life
much simpler for everybody.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpcquPFfyhuM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ES, CFLAGS, and CXXFLAGS per package? (Of course,
I do realize that it's the lack of such files that lead vapier to
propose his solution, which is rather more convenient for one-off
builds.)
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgp5cgkviFCsQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ion. Probably the
> same for a few archs.
I didn't say that the x86 policy was a bad one. I was rather hoping
that x86 was doing peer review and at least one other arch team wasn't,
since then we could try to make some sort of quantitative comparison.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
peer review? Do we have
any statistics or anecdotal evidence for what's improving, and whether
or not anything is getting worse as a result?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0
nk it's still required.
> -motif - is unmaintained in portage and rather outdated, does not look good.
> Should not be default for optional interfaces
I believe that flag is mainly there to reduce the "Hey, my xpdf package
lacks the xpdf binary" bugs.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
t;) that was either
overlooked in the rest of that thread or ignored because people
considered it to be useless; I'm not sure which. In any event, I just
want to bring it to the council's attention as an alternative approach.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Basically, it would be something that allowed you to "browse" the current
> tree of submitted ebuilds. This way users that submit something can
> categorize it for devs to easily look for ebuilds they may be interested
> in, and we can make it so we could easily grab the ebuild
Mark Loeser wrote: [Wed May 24 2006, 04:37:44PM CDT]
> Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > How was the conversion done? Do we now have a tool to convert rst to
> > guidexml, or was the conversion all done by hand (which would be a truly
> > frightening
s additional detail, perhaps) would suffice, I'd think:
Authors
---
Ciaran McCreesh, Grant Goodyear, Aaron Walker, Robert Coie, Tom
Martin, Paul Varner, Ilya Volynets-Evenbakh, Diego Patteno Fernando J.
Pareda, Simon Stelling, Alin Dobre, and Joseph Jezak
Seem reasonable?
-g2boojum-
--
Gran
that my name was not listed in the section titled
"Authors".)
Finally, the whole issue goes away by either changing the heading on that
first page from "Authors" to "Maintainers" or "Editors", or by adding
the list of contributors back to this page. It'
Mark Loeser wrote:
> At long last the devmanual is official. You can find it at
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org. I would like to thank plasmaroo for helping
> me with converting it to XML (since he did all of the XSL work to add in
> the features we needed to make it easy to write and expand upon).
rating
release media" being on obvious example).
Perhaps something like the following would suffice:
GLEP: xx
Title: Supporting alternative package managers
Version: $Revision: 1.3 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2005/11/13 17:16:50 $
Author: Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Dr
ouldn't Gentoo then just fork the package manager? Am I
missing something obvious?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpRDW94TT7bg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
king things harder
> for the people who do real work around here. If you don't have anything
> useful to contribute, shut up and go away.
*Sigh* Be nice, please. Incidentally, he did have a point that this
thread is now darn hard to follow. Perhaps it's time to split of
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Stop making such odd and wrong comparisons. The package manager is part of
> what defines a distribution, choosing a shell is the users choice. If you
> want to make the package manager matter of choice, start your own
> distribution.
Just because it has historically bee
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Incidentally, in reading this thread it seems to me that a tendency to
> offer opinions (or predictions) as though they were facts has been a
> common theme. Please try to separate the two, whenever possible.
Just to clarify, I was not limiting that comment
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
>> At present I ask not for support, but for a minor addition for
>> convenience purposes.
>
> One that has more disadvantages than advantages as already pointed out.
Many of your comments have been quite valuable, but I've noticed that
your recent posts fail to distinguish
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | 4) Will Paludis ever become a Gentoo Project?
>
> Pretty unlikely, past events considered. Personally I kind of like
> having commit access to my own code...
I thought we (Gentoo) already had SVN repositories with non-Gentoo-dev
committers? I'm pretty sure that was one
that
sort of discussion is certainly not something that I would want to
discourage!
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpNAVhQZhJFm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
paludis installed-package database and can
generate the equivalent portage db)?
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpCeUn97oRES.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ad was if it wouldn't be simpler to add the
paludis-specific stuff to the existing files, and have portage ignore
it.)
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpAQhR879eWT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Wed May 10 2006, 08:32:01AM CDT]
> I have a copy of the font.
>
> It is ©2000 Ethan Dunham ‐ Fonthead Design ‐ http://www.fonthead.com
Thanks! Okay, it's part of their freeware font "font heads".
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Develope
evidence to
the contrary, please let me know, and I'll see what I can do to obtain
any necessary rights.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpNDUDbMRug5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
xplain why we have a cow's face on a 404 page or trying to
> explain why we like Larry is like trying to explain a love story: You
> just can't without everybody looking strange at you afterwards.
True!
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECT
ybody know if we do still need people to help w/ LDAP?
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpYpfv7VBNGY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
A. Khattri wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>
>> A. Khattri wrote:
>>> Does this sound right or is there a better (preferred?) way?
>> Try to fix --enable-conf-install to respect DESTDIR or whatever other
>> install method you're using, or look to see what flag it will take at
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
