Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP5 Unstable ?

2005-04-23 Thread D. Wokan
Jan Kundrát wrote: Omer Cohen wrote: we're talking about one of the biggest OC communities. ...and the same community whose members write code like that described in PHP's bug 31261 [1], which seems quite ugly, at least to me. My point is that even if developers say their code is stable,

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP 5 unstable ?

2005-04-23 Thread D. Wokan
Collins Richey wrote: On 4/23/05, Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: According to bugzilla, there are lots of open bugs (132 to be exact) containing the word 'php' in the summary. From a quick glimpse many of them seem related to php-5. Looks like your're 100% right. One user d

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP 5 unstable ?

2005-04-23 Thread D. Wokan
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:34:36 +0200 Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Quite a lot has changed between PHP 4.3.x and 5.0.x. Apparently, | > things like classes are totally different. The classes in PHP 5 | > more closely resemble Java than the ones in PHP 4. | |

Re: [gentoo-dev] reply-to munging

2005-04-17 Thread D. Wokan
Jason Wever wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Chris Gianelloni wrote: Reply-to-All is evil. You should be using Reply-to-List. I know that I sure don't need to get the same email both on and off-list. Off-list emails should be reserved only for when you ex