Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Bryan �stergaard
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:34:20AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > > I think we've fixed some of those issues with solar's script. You just > need to look at the list and make your assumptions. The script is great > to spitting out a list that you can look it. Its not 100%, but its good > enough t

Re: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41]

2005-11-20 Thread Bryan �stergaard
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:26:28PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by > > > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts > > > themselves (rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two

2005-11-05 Thread Bryan �stergaard
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:58:00PM +0100, Grobian wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I disagree. A lot Gentoo users I know read gentoo-announce and the GWN. > For me it works quite well if I see a message with a warning on > something. I can quickly find it back if I am in need for it. I wo