On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:26:28PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by > > > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts > > > themselves (rather then asking infra to do so) > > > > First I've heard of this request. Has a bug been submitted for it? It's > > easy enough to set up some cron jobs to run scripts and email output to an > > alias or mailing list. > > Only the usual irc infra requests (will take that comment as > indication it's time to open a bug). I'm currently retiring a somewhat large portion of inactive devs. I don't use solars script as it doesn't work correctly in some cases. This has been discussed several times on #-infra together with the need for checking bugzilla activity. I've fixed the bugzilla activity using a slightly hackish php script that pulls activity directly from the database for now but it should probably be cleaned up a bit. My biggest problem really is checking cvs/svn activity right now because of the aforementioned bug that more or less forces me to use 'cvs history'.
I'll file a bug or two with my requirements later today so it can be handled in a more orderly fashion. > > Would need the ability to maintain a blacklist of users to > auto-ignore (releng), and would need to pull from svn also (something > the current script doesn't handle afaik). > > Binding pulling buzilla stats in would be needed also (poke kloeri > about that one). > > Ultimately, tracking actual pulls (ssh access on lark) rather then > just pushes would be needed to- otherwise new doc devs, AT's, and new > alt devs would be flagged due to their lack of the write bit. I don't really care about anything besides commits right now. Even for ATs having only ro cvs access I should still be able to determine their activity from bugs.g.o activity. Failing that I do talk to leads when in doubt and always try to cc people on any retirement bugs I file so they can object if needed. > > Forums people, any thoughts/requirements? > ~harring We should be able to handle forums staff the same way I currently check bugs activity. Only requires ro access to the database and a small script but this would obviously have to be discussed with infra and forum leads. Regards, Bryan Østergaard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
