Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:25:19 -0800 Alec Warner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 9:14 AM Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Matt Turner wrote: > > > repoman is inferior to other tooling mentioned. The other tooling > > > is actually run in CI. > > > > The problem seems to be that CI is running someth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman

2022-03-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 12:07:40 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 09:29:59AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:09 PM Joonas Niilola > > wrote: > > > > > > On 9.3.2022 23.00, Matt Turner wrote: > > > > I'd like to deprecate and ultimately remove repoman.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.7 cleanup: plan B

2020-08-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 23:41:33 + (UTC) "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > > TL;DR: we might keep Python 2.7 supported as a build-time dependency > > of a few packages as necessary, while removing the eclass support > > for installing packages for py2.7. > > > > As I've mention

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/rstcheck-3.3.1: Add rstcheck python package (#16399)

2020-06-25 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:23:29 +0100 Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi Brian > > On 6/25/20 11:18 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > You add yourself as primary maintainer. The proxy maintainers will > > add themselves for the merge to the repo after all review is done. > > This w

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/rstcheck-3.3.1: Add rstcheck python package (#16399)

2020-06-25 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 23:11:29 +0100 Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to ask for your help on selecting the project > maintainer for a new ebuild. > > I created a pull request for the ebuild in subject[1] and the QA > reports complaints about missing project maintainer[2]. What

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/sync2d

2020-06-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:27:51 -0700 Christopher Head wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 12:40:17 -0700 > Matt Turner wrote: > > > With that in mind, I don't expect it to gain Python 3 support, nor > > do I expect an additional 15 days of waiting time to change that > > fact. 15 vs 30 days doesn't seem w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-31 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 27 May 2020 01:28:02 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:09 AM Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700 > > Alec Warner wrote: > > > > > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 27 May 2020 17:39:21 +0200 Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/05/2020 01.31, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > * dev-python/boto3 > > * dev-python/botocore > > Do you mind if I join you on those? I use them a lot, and I planned to > comaintain awscli since P

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 26 May 2020 20:24:56 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting > together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit > and so on. > > Some of these come in combined (e.g. gitlab offers repo hosting, code > review / pul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2020-05-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 26 May 2020 23:12:06 +0100 Andrey Utkin wrote: > I have transitioned to "away" state as I have to reclaim my time for > other uses. Here I am trying to reduce the scope of my Gentoo > responsibilities to make potential return to activity less dreadful > and overwhelming. > > Call for suc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Anti-spam for goose

2020-05-22 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 23 May 2020 07:20:22 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:47:07 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Other ideas > > === > > Do you have any other ideas on how we could resolve this? > > And a question I'd like to revisit, because nobody responded to it: > > - Wha

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: "emerge --sync" vs "emaint sync"

2020-05-06 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 6 May 2020 17:02:42 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I know that most of our documentation tells people to use "emerge > --sync"; however, today I heard about "emaint sync" for the first > time. ;-) > > Which one should we use? Will there be a phase-out for "emerge > --sync" or "e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last standing Python 2.7 dependency

2020-05-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 3 May 2020 08:37:27 -0400 Brian Evans wrote: > On 5/3/20 2:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 02-05-2020 23:24:42 -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: > >> On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200 > >> Viktar Patotski wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last standing Python 2.7 dependency

2020-05-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 3 May 2020 07:28:50 +0200 Viktar Patotski wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd also like to clean my system and have it Python 2.7 free. Are > there any guidelines to check which packages are still using pyton2_7 > in my system? > > Thanks, > Viktar > There are both equery and enalyze commands in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/pythondialog /ramlfications /repoze-sphinx-autointerface /robotframework /sleekxmpp /sphinxcontrib-issuetracker /toro /tx*

2020-04-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:43:16 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > The Python team will no longer maintain the following packages. They > all need porting to Python 3.7 and newer, and have some obstacle > in doing so. They have only few revdeps which we do not maintain. > > dev-python/pythondialog > dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/txtorcon

2020-04-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:49:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > # Michał Górny (2020-04-26) > # Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. No revdeps. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #719604. > dev-python/txtorcon > I'm taking maintainence back, is a dependency for crossbar which I am bringing back too.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation

2020-04-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 11:32:06 +0200 Toralf Förster wrote: > On 4/26/20 11:09 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > Instead of using the IP address, you could generate a UUID when > > installing the tool. > > like the pfl tool did ? > Like the last gentoostats gsoc project did. As for enterprise/sch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/{autobahn,cbor,girder-client,kazoo,libcloud,logbook}

2020-04-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:22:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages will no longer be maintained by the Python > team: > > dev-python/autobahn > dev-python/cbor I'll maintain these again along with buildbot now that I am back. > dev-python/girder-client > dev-python/kazoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Python application with multiple new dependencies

2019-04-13 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 23:03:53 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 22:27 +0200, Ralph Seichter wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > imagine a Python application "monty" with the following requirements > > listed in setup.py: > > > > install_requires=[ > > 'ham>=1.0', > > 'spam>=

Re: [gentoo-dev] adding app-crypt/gentoo-keys to @system

2019-02-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600 Matthew Thode wrote: > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > > >> > > >> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system > > >> the least bad way to solve it?) > > >> > > > > > > It'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree (was: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29)

2018-07-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:31:15 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018, Corentin “Nado” Pazdera wrote: > > > July 27, 2018 4:07 PM, "William Hubbs" > > wrote: > > >> Section 5.5.2 describes the directory structure of /var/cache. > >> These paths are all optional [1]. > >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-backup/fsarchiver, app-cdr/daa2iso...

2018-07-19 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:10:11 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > Due to Markos Chandras' prolonged absence, the following packages are > up for grabs now: > > dev-util/buildbot-slave I've taken over all buildbot maintenance. This one will be tree-cleaned soon. The old buildbot-0.8 release

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree

2018-07-12 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 17:35:41 -0700 Raymond Jennings wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:47 PM Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:49:37 -0700 > > Raymond Jennings wrote: > > > > > In that case, I vote for /var/cache/portage, since

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree

2018-07-12 Thread Brian Dolbec
and the package manager. PLUS, it has been decided already long ago that the directory name should reflect the repository name. We have been enforcing that rule for overlays for a long time. It has just been taking a long time to get our tooling in order so that we can change our own to follow that rule. So, "portage" should not be a directory name in the new default path. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving default location of portage tree

2018-07-09 Thread Brian Dolbec
with catalyst-3 for all arches, but I don't know about some of the lesser used arches as some of those are older dates. That and a portage release with the new default location set in it's backup configs. So, it should be ready to convert if the minor arches stage are b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] glep-0063: Make 2-yearly expiration term mandatory

2018-07-06 Thread Brian Dolbec
them *before* the term, they are not very nice because how does > someone dare remind very important developer who was planning to do it > week before expiration, and now he needed to waste his precious time > reading your mail. > I never experienced a single developer show or say anything like you are suggesting. Most, thanked me for the reminder whether it was in IRC or email. And since I always cc'd the gkeys alias (most needed changes to meet the spec too), I'm sure Kristian will confirm this. -- Brian Dolbec pgp5aZWnCcqDB.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] glep-0063: Make 2-yearly expiration term mandatory

2018-07-06 Thread Brian Dolbec
d do it before it actually expires. > I have gkeys spec-check start warning at 30 days, and it has been my experience that often it only gets renewed last minute (depends on how active the developer is. As it is one of those things that gets put off thinking there is still lots of time... But also, many of those had keys that did not meet the spec requirements. -- Brian Dolbec pgphYyrmtOdFC.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: app-crypt/gkeys-gen

2018-07-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
# Brian Dolbec (4 July 2018) # No longer needed, newer app-crypt/gnupg-2 versions have simple cli options # for generating new keys and doing key maintenance. Removal in a month app-crypt/gkeys-gen -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: killing mediawiki

2018-07-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
ate templates for a go-jira command line interface so a visually impaired co-worker could interact with those systems. -- Brian Dolbec pgp2ADbD_1YTy.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: why are we still distributing the portage tree via rsync?

2018-07-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
ate me on that, and is it worth considering moving > away from rsync distribution? > > Thanks, > > William > because: 1) it is still the most bandwidth economical means of distributing the tree 2) we have a large infrastructure of rsync mirrors, which we do not for git. 3) see #1 -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustless Infrastructure

2018-07-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
e lapsed. Will they be updated? > > Cheers, > R0b0t1 > app-crypt/gentoo-keys has been updated yesterday. with renewed interest in gpg signatures, I will endeavor to keep it updated until is fully automated. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestions for simplifying VIDEO_CARDS situation

2018-06-17 Thread Brian Dolbec
in a dictionary and can set the USE and VIDEO_CARDS flags according to the video card(s) you have. This would be along the same lines as the app-portage/cpuid2cpuflags pkg. Then the pkg is updated as new drivers and combinations are changed. Perhaps have it run in pkg_postisnt to print any irregularities it finds and ewarn they need fixing. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Openstack Summit MeetUp: dinner planning for Wednesday?

2018-05-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
vening. If you're > interested, privately email me. Please include a mention of specific > dietary requirements if any. > I am also local to Vancouver, but won't be at the event. Wednesday works better for me too. My daughter has ball games Tuesday and Thursday. -- Brian Dolbec pgphPm7lUDY8d.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for May 2018

2018-05-07 Thread Brian Dolbec
of that tooling) I would then suggest the dependency depth check to default to one (or two) so as to not slow things down drastically. Perhaps a Q/A check report to scan the whole tree on a weekly basis. But that would also require PMS to be updated for the new file, which means a council vote... -- Bri

Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions on overlays, repositories and PMS

2018-02-23 Thread Brian Dolbec
masters" attribute in /etc/portage/repos.conf make the > repository inherit other data than the eclasses? > > 5. since every repos can have a profiles/categories file, is the > file /etc/portage/categories obsolete (or should it be)? > > > Best Regards, > Michael Lienhardt > > -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] AMD64 Arch Testers needed urgently

2017-12-14 Thread Brian Dolbec
while and my day job is working on/developing buildbot scripts. I am planning out some pkg bumping scripts to help with regular pkg maintenance. I hope to have some initial code running during the holiday break. There should be a bunch of shared factory code possible as there will be some overlap in their needs. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Help testing ebuilds? golang/Fabio load balancer

2017-11-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
there is a tradeoff between space and robustness. If one .keepdir is lost, it may only affect a few packages. If the database becomes corrupted. It could potentially mean the loss of much more of your installed pkg data. Spanning a great deal of the installed pkgs. In this case simplicity of .keepdir is in my opinion, much better than a single db. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project

2017-09-22 Thread Brian Dolbec
a bind mount of > the build directory on top of the overlay should give normal > performance to everything that is obeying good practice. > > After the build completes the directory that was mounted as upper > could be scanned to find any wayward writes that had occurred... > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] About adding a *warning* to remind maintainers to check for new PYTHON_COMPAT values

2017-07-10 Thread Brian Dolbec
pkgs as well. If not committed straight to the tree, then emailed as a patch to the maintainers, perhaps in a pending repo/branch, bugzilla... TBD. Oh, and I want to connect as many arch specific workers to it as well. That should ease ebuild bumps, PYTHON_COMPAT and keywording maintainence.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Should the compressed archive of an executable file be executable too?

2017-06-18 Thread Brian Dolbec
it directly, but > rather see it as example? The user reads it, copies and modifies > it and then sets the +x. > > > I am interested in your comments and wish you a nice Sunday. > yeah, makes sense to drop +x, it is better to look at the examples before running them blindly. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-09 Thread Brian Dolbec
e the bot to rev-bump all ebuilds just as easily. Pkgs without tests, those would be harder and we could do some basic tests on those, like syntax, test imports, but would require additional means of testing in order to qualify for an auto-python addition. It should also be possible for the bot to scrape setup.py for comppatible python versions. Many of the pkgs I have been working with recently have them listed. Also there is travis.yml files in many upstream pkg repos which can also be scraped for tested pythons. It could certainly reduce the manpower needed to keep things up to date. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: profiles/arches.desc - improve repoman flexibility (with other benefits)

2017-03-26 Thread Brian Dolbec
ools trying to determine a list of stable > arches should fall back to current method of scanning profiles.desc > for stable profiles. > > b) arches.desc and old system > Tools ignore the unknown file (?). > Repoman and other tools may emit surplus dependency errors when > profiles are checked on arches that are "testing" (they check the > consistency of the stable tree alone, which is not OK, since "arch" > is supposed to be treated like "~arch"). This affects only > development work and can be fixed by updating repoman. > > c) PMS may need to be amended to allow the additional file. > > > 8] Several repositories > > If arches.desc is present in several repositories, then the strictest > setting for an arch wins. [I don't really see many usecases for this > though.] > > > Congratulations for getting this far. What's your opinion? > -- Brian Dolbec pgp9tJJDrGBMM.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Gentoolkit-dev is now merged into >=gentoolkit-0.4.0 (Deprecation warning)

2017-03-22 Thread Brian Dolbec
her. Once gentoolkit-0.4.0 has been stabilized, the remaining gentoolkit-dev releases will be masked for removal and subsequent tree-cleaning. Thank you -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Project: Gentoostats

2017-01-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 22:06:23 -0800 Daniel Campbell wrote: > Still, interesting project and I might run it on a machine if it can > help us out. > What do you mean "if"... You __WILL__ run it!! ;) -- Brian Dolbec pgpVwdxfQbgPH.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signature found, but from unknown key (see push-cert)

2017-01-01 Thread Brian Dolbec
s: Andrey Grozin : 6FCC83E26D94FB054B76101653D4ABFA88DD61C4 Gkey task results: Found Failures: --- Revoked: 0 Invalid: 0 No Signing subkey..: 1 No Encryption subkey...: 0 Algorithm..: 0 Bit length.....: 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

2016-12-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
es in their profiles or ``make.conf`` files, all updated > ebuilds will immediately reflect the changes. > > During this, the variables can be added to the EAPI=7 specification, > and may eventually be added to PMS §11.1. > > > Suggested Wording

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Who runs Gentoo was -> RFC: Userkit.eclass

2016-12-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 16:49:19 -0500 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 11:27:20 AM EST Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > > I think you will find that ChromeOS is not really based on Gentoo, > > but built using Gentoo as the base os it IS bui

Re: [gentoo-dev] OT Who runs Gentoo was -> RFC: Userkit.eclass

2016-12-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
modified package management systems. The final resulting OS has it's own methods of updating itself and installing the binaries. (At least that is the way it was some years ago, last I had looked) -- Brian Dolbec pgpxLUP0qbKGd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

2016-12-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
m > It gets worse than that. I recently added several pkg to the tree that had slightly different names for the github repo than they publishedin pypi. I in turn ended up naming it slightly different to fit our category/pkg system. So, the end result is not one common name, but three. For some, I tried to stick with the github repo name, despite getting the tarball from pypi due to the inconsistent github sha's. -- Brian Dolbec pgpCuU6XZuV45.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Uppercase characters in package names

2016-12-02 Thread Brian Dolbec
I used mixed case to prevent conflicts with other existing projects that google, pypi, etc. searching returned results for. But still have the name represent what it did. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass, drop unused egg-base settings

2016-11-29 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:13:19 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > > While working on the last 2 version bumps to the twisted package, I > > kept getting an error in which the *egg-info/SOURCES.txt file > > ab

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] distutils-r1.eclass, drop unused egg-base settings

2016-11-29 Thread Brian Dolbec
an interim patch for testing and initial review. -- Brian Dolbec From 95ae3bf2c330ca3c527a6350829e3b6fc7fb9dc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Dolbec Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:48:09 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] nuke setting egg info path --- eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 5 - 1 file changed, 5

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog generation, profiles/ mess.

2016-11-29 Thread Brian Dolbec
single > metadata.xml), > - top-level ChangeLog for anything not covered by the other > ChangeLogs. > > Ulrich +1, keep it simple -- Brian Dolbec pgpY7ZcxtzCHE.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Future EAPI version operator changes

2016-11-07 Thread Brian Dolbec
it, but more and more so-called "package management" systems (mostly language specific ones) all use that method. So transitioning to that, should make package maintenance easier. Possibly even have some automation tools to check them during version bumps, etc... -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] New single dev-python/twisted package releases in the tree

2016-10-12 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:35:25 -0700 Brian Dolbec wrote: > Since the mid 15.x.x releases of twisted, upstream changed from the > split releases twisted-{core,names,web,...} to a single twisted > package release. Our gentoo tree has been behind with upstream > releases since then part

[gentoo-dev] New single dev-python/twisted package releases in the tree

2016-10-12 Thread Brian Dolbec
||(). You should not introduce new pkgs and hopefully new ebuild versions of existing pkgs that list only the old split twisted pkgs as dependencies. I am sure that eventually the old split releases will be tree-cleaned at some future point. Thank you -- Brian Dolbec pgpxfrk_UJPrK.pgp Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:40:39 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > > > I have some trouble with not being able to close bugs as resolved > > when the fixes have been released. But I do see that the majority > > of w

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Working Group established to evaluate the stable tree

2016-08-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
ber the the different perspectives and try to make it clear what they are for. Also, if a pkg is never stabilized... does that mean it's bugs can never be closed? So far in the discussion, that point has not been brought up, but is very relevant to the discussion. /me mumbles about the extra bookeeping that work-flow will make...and subsequently put off and/or forget to do ;) -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: grub2 multislot use flag is being disabled

2016-08-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:12:32 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > typo: anyonewho missed a space -- Brian Dolbec pgphFxTuJI75_.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2016-08-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:24:08 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-portage/g-sorcery > app-portage/gs-elpa > app-portage/gs-pypi I'll sign layman project up for these -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Farewell Gentoo.

2016-08-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
that have and continue to make Gentoo such an amazing project. Keep > making Gentoo better! > > Keep in touch. > Farewell, and thanks! > Sad to see you go, but, also glad you were a dev for so many years :) I hope to see you around in the future too, even if it is only for visit :) Take care, have fun,... don't be a stranger ;) -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for a new mentor...

2016-07-20 Thread Brian Dolbec
ould be helpful to list your timezone and normal availability times. That will help potential mentors know if they match up availability times. Aside from sparc related updates, is there any other areas of the ebuild tree your more interested in like desktop environments, gnome, kde, *box, networking, tools... -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Killing VERIFIED state, possibly introducing STABILIZED

2016-06-17 Thread Brian Dolbec
When we as upstream commit patches for bugs we tag them as InVCS and close them when they are in a release. We have not kept them open until that release has been stabilized unless we've missed closing it or been distracted and forgotten to clean them up. If you want to track that at the ebuild level, you could do that, but would need to identify it's tracker in a clear way to distinguish it from code bugs. -- Brian Dolbec pgp69AoKFcWN9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

2016-06-07 Thread Brian Dolbec
eeded to set package.use. This would also have to be a package manager feature and run similar to the auto-unmask feature. FEATURES="preferred-guis" Let's try and keep things as simple as possible. From what I've gleaned form the emails I have read, is that what the general user wants to happen, select the toolkit in the order of their preference. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

2016-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 27 May 2016 11:35:01 -0500 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: [snip] > > I'll be really sad when gtk2 is totally abolished in Gentoo. :( > > I suppose I'll have to break down and switch to KDE maybe. > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

2016-05-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
r cartoonish changes to the look, feel and generally un-intuitive user interface. The new file selector is irritating to use despite getting all the old behaviour settings I know of set, the lack of the ability to paste a path into it, forcing you to navigate directory by directory, and other BS behaviour... Some apps even have less functionality and usefullnes. I have a local copy of dev-vcs/gitg-0.27 ebuild which I use daily which despite some instability is far more useful than it's "modern" counterpart. I use xfce4 for both work and my own workstation, and like it, but it's apps are getting increasingly more corrupted by gtk3isms :( So, I accept I'll not be liked by the gtk team for wanting to keep gtk2 around still. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version

2016-05-17 Thread Brian Dolbec
ities for running post-install (pre-merge) QA-checks are in > place. Please have a look at portage's misc-functions.sh, > install_qa_check() will reveal the locations where you can find the > installed checks, along with a place for local overrides. Perhaps you > can design something around this? > > With kind regards, > tomboy64 > These tests would be run post-merge, in the normal file system. Mainly for stabilization checks that can be automated, so not a QA-checks qualifier which looks for common problems that can potentially lead to bugs before it is merged to the normal file system. -- Brian Dolbec pgpX_padjvLLx.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEW: split portage/repoman releases now in the tree

2016-05-17 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 17 May 2016 08:50:25 +0200 Marcin Mirosław wrote: > W dniu 16.05.2016 o 10:45, Dirkjan Ochtman pisze: > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Brian Dolbec > > wrote: > >> repoman-2.3.0_rc1 is the stage2 rewrite code. The checks are now > >> modular, an

[gentoo-dev] NEW: split portage/repoman releases now in the tree

2016-05-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
o. The better the test ebuild coverage we have, the better our Q/A tools (like repoman) will be and the less often things will be released broken. Thank you -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2016-05-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 15 May 2016 04:18:39 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 05/15/2016 02:15 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > On Sun, 15 May 2016 11:05:21 +0200 > > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 7 May 2016 23:25:58 +0200 > >> Michał Górny wrote: > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2016-05-15 Thread Brian Dolbec
e gen-b0rk test repo, that will be a good testing ground for eclass changes too. It just needs more devs to make test ebuilds to get it fully populated ;) -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flag proposal: memcached

2016-05-14 Thread Brian Dolbec
ched). > > > > I suppose the description can just be "Enable memcached support". > > > > Any objections? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dirkjan > > > > its a good idea given its popularity and the unequivocal meaning of > "memcached". so i say do it. > +1 -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

2016-05-10 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 10 May 2016 22:40:39 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > >> I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff. > >> > > > > Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to > > te

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ebuild-writing/variables: better describe ROOT

2016-05-10 Thread Brian Dolbec
T isn't determined until merge time. > > I agree, repoman should be catching this stuff. > Then Please contribute some test ebuilds for the gen-b0rk repo to test repoman or any other Q/A apps with. If they fail to detect the test ebuilds, it will give us something to use to help trace the code errors. It'll also make for a much better testing system overall for any app performing any type of Q/A on ebuilds. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] On banning merge commits

2016-05-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
ebase && git push --signed" successfully without some other pushes in between causing a rejected non-fast forward push. -- Brian Dolbec pgpSUtzSFxJgr.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] New gen-b0rk repository specifically for Q/A tools testing

2016-05-01 Thread Brian Dolbec
igned-pushes are mandatory 9) The metadata category will get files of validated output that can be used to verify code changes in the various categories and repo wide runs. Diffing the output, should help to verify code changes did not break anything. 10) See rules 1-9 :-) -- Brian D

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-05-01 Thread Brian Dolbec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> Michał Górny: > >>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 19:41:06 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.dtd: Remove obsolete element per GLEP 68

2016-04-28 Thread Brian Dolbec
-> > > > - > - > - > > > Isn't this almost obsolete? it's now xmlschema... And I hope to have the new repoman with it out this weekend :) -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken!

2016-03-30 Thread Brian Dolbec
27;s no good > way to check the rules. > > Yeah, it would be nice to have a final resolution to the metadataDTD ==> xmlshema change so the repoman metadata module can get a proper re-write. In the meantime, repoman can not detect the recent change to the maintainer field. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman rewrite stage3. Migrate check data to the tree

2016-03-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:40:31 -0800 Patrick McLean wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:30:07 -0800 > Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > So, where do we place this directory and what rules do we > > establish about it's modifications? > > > >location? : in the

[gentoo-dev] Repoman rewrite stage3. Migrate check data to the tree

2016-03-10 Thread Brian Dolbec
itch between an installed repoman and the developing code to compare results to aid in debugging. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo tree package moves updates.

2016-03-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:40:34 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > > As discussed a few years ago. We agreed to trim the package moves > > updates to maintain 4 years history active in the tree. It currently > >

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo tree package moves updates.

2016-03-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
ich I made the trimmed update files available for download. With the tree now being git based. They will be easily available in the git history. Thank you -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
a big reason behind this thread). Now make some older users system or low powered arm system do that with much lower resources and you are talking about a long time for completion. -- Brian Dolbec pgpF8oAtbYAJh.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-16 Thread Brian Dolbec
engineering team, I've not seen one email or bug report that has been due to a problem with eudev. If there were I did not see it pass thru the group communications channels. So, there are lots more eudev users out there than the few dozen you seem to intimate to. Can we please put an end to this thread! ONE WAY OR THE OTHER!!! -- Brian Dolbec pgpFDfuOoylwW.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-16 Thread Brian Dolbec
ople think the systemd people are the one migrating and the systemd people think the reverse... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOOs8MaR1YM And from some people's comments in this thread... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dndAXxqJbc0 -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-16 Thread Brian Dolbec
e for a final vote! If we had all spent our time working on real problems as we've spent reading this never ending debate mail... but alas, this will be yet another item that must be decided by the council. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-14 Thread Brian Dolbec
r something serious. It was a murder trial. This is about a simple virtual and the default order of its providers!!! -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-10 Thread Brian Dolbec
rud & confusion, we'll be waiting 20 years. By then even systemd will have been replaced by something else... -- Brian Dolbec pgpBW0P78uAcI.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] python-exec2 C wrapper is looking for a new name!

2016-02-09 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:32:38 -0800 Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:53:52 -0500 > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > On 09/02/16 02:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hello, everyone. > > > > > > After all those boring, meaningless and violent ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] python-exec2 C wrapper is looking for a new name!

2016-02-09 Thread Brian Dolbec
between the two > > wrappers, so the C counterpart would have to be highlighted somehow. > > > > python-exec-cwrapper ? > NO, No, you mistyped it... python-exec-crapper :O -- Brian Dolbec P.S. just finning with you :)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-09 Thread Brian Dolbec
avoid doing today... tsk, tsk, tsk IT IS A SIMPLE POLL of the possibility of switching the default VIRTUAL we were suppose to be talking about/voting on Sorry everyone for a little shouting of my own. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
what the default is don't we? Yes, we do. Also, it is releng's intention to change to a stage4 for normal new install stages. It will contain the most needed pkgs for new installs, and allow the @system set to be trimmed down more. It is entirely possible, to at that point, then create s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-08 Thread Brian Dolbec
/005516.html > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/618 > ) > > So it'd be (1) following upstreams recommendations and (2) dogfooding > our own tools. I don't see any downsides to this :) > +1 I switched to eudev a few years ago and glad I did. The non-systemd profiles should have eudev as default. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 05/21] ebuild-writing/misc-files: replace the code for cvs commit with git #558642

2016-02-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
7f20d2332ab62feb16657504 > +Author: Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> > +Date: Tue Sep 22 10:47:49 2015 +0200 > + > + dev-ros: Add metadata.xml for the category. > > > -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] New schema language for metadata validation?

2016-01-27 Thread Brian Dolbec
DK on my laptop, but > couldn't easily get it to run. I don't really have a Gentoo machine on > which I want to install the whole Java shebang, so maybe someone else > can run a quick conversion? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > that looks very easy to read and modify. -- Brian Dolbec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add sync-git-extra-opts or sync-git-pull-extra-opts to repos.conf

2016-01-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:46:41 +0800 konsolebox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 03:45:14 +0800 > > konsolebox wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Brian Dolbec > >> wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 08/19] ebuild-maintenance: rewrite the text on adding binary files to the tree #558642

2016-01-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
t; > >>> -- 2.4.10 > >>> > >>> > >> > >> "Again you should not compress these patches because git does > >> not play well binary files". > >> > >> I'm not sure this statement still holds true w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add sync-git-extra-opts or sync-git-pull-extra-opts to repos.conf

2016-01-22 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 03:45:14 +0800 konsolebox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Brian Dolbec > wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 01:05:12 +0800 > > konsolebox wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add sync-git-extra-opts or sync-git-pull-extra-opts to repos.conf

2016-01-22 Thread Brian Dolbec
nced via the auto-sync setting. So layman can git sync the gentoo repo like Duncan described without also syncing your manually synced layman repos. -- Brian Dolbec

  1   2   3   >