Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.6 for x86 stable

2005-09-02 Thread Armando Di Cianno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-09-02 15:46:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote: =gcc-3.4.3-r1 and lemme rephrase what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can punt the

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.6 for x86 stable

2005-09-02 Thread Armando Di Cianno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-09-02 13:07:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been trying to phase out dev-libs/libffi for a long while...if someone can figure out a patch for gcc-3.3 series that compiles and installs libffi w/o building the entirety o

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.6 for x86 stable

2005-09-02 Thread Armando Di Cianno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6 to x86 stable ?

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEPEND mismatches

2005-07-06 Thread Armando Di Cianno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-07-05 20:00:24 -0400 Sven Wegener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Short explanation for the subject: A *DEPEND mismatch is when a package is listed in DEPEND, but missing in RDEPEND and vice versa. I have a list of ebuilds at http://dev.gentoo.