On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016)
> # Obsolete and not needed anymore, bug #545704, removal in a month.
> dev-dotnet/pango-sharp
This one still has some reverse dependencies that you missed.
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/9c07d2947
On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 17:32:02 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> Listing the architectures seems redundant if they are also in the cc:
> field. In your example above, why would you need arm in the cc: field
> for app-foo/bas-2.3.4?
Often, the required work for "lists of keywords/stabilizations" has
i
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function
> inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined.
> See bug #579188
kernel-2.eclass currently calls die in global scope for EAPI 6, so
this change has no real effect.
I would sugg
If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function
inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined.
See bug #579188
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index c171940..3f5f
-Version 20161122-09:09 kentnlefd9436
net-misc/streamlink 20161125-11:49 soap b40df3f
x11-libs/xapps 20161127-14:04 k_f 393d0d6
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : robb
On 25/11/2016 23:34, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote:
> AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all.
> You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources
> along with your project.
>
>
> You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this
# Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016)
# Dead for years, replaced by media-video/devedeng, bug #430564,
removal in
# a month.
media-video/devede
# Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016)
# Dead for years, still using udisks:0 and no sign to be ever ported,
bug
# #440856 and bug #440858, removal in a month.
sys-apps/uevt
On 27/11/16 10:32, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 06:41:20AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many
>> architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors
>> contributing to this, but today I'd like t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 06:41:20AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many
> architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors
> contributing to this, but today I'd like to address three specific
> problems that unne
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:55:09AM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Agreed. For most of my packages, I really don't mind since we're all
> working on Gentoo together, but it'd be super helpful if I was simply
> notified in the event that a package I maintain has gotten a security
> bump,
KV_to_int usage should be removed.
Tracker bug is at: 384041 and kernel-2.eclass bug is at 587318.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 1398c0c..c171940 100644
--- a/eclass/kernel-2.ecl
# Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016)
# Not compatible with tcl/tk 8.6, obsolete version, bug #547322.
# Try to use versions from sci overlay. Removal in a month.
media-gfx/brlcad
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
>>
>> What about maintainers that are away without writing it in their
>> maintainer bug ?
>> After how many days of no replay can be fair to touch their package ?
>
> If a developer
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> What about maintainers that are away without writing it in their
> maintainer bug ?
> After how many days of no replay can be fair to touch their package ?
I think we already have dev-away.
If a maintainer marks themselves as devaway, m
15 matches
Mail list logo
