Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:40:36 +0800 Jason Zaman wrote: > One way would be to use a plain text attachment with a standardized > filename. If there are updates to the list then the new should obsolete > the old and the script can pull non-obsoleted ones. > The problem then is how do you search for t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 25/11/16 15:54, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: >> >> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 >> =app-foo/baz-2.3.4 amd64 x86 # will be stabilis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Jason Zaman
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 06:41:20AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many > architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors > contributing to this, but today I'd like to address three specific > problems that unne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Jason Zaman
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:54:41PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > > > Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: > > > > =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 > > =app-foo/baz-2.3.4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:54:41 +1300 Kent Fredric wrote: > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ugh. I attached that so wrong and it is unreadable. How does one "reply to X" and "attach other email Y" in claws without cocking it up entirely. "message/rfc822" as an attachment encoding type

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 Michael Palimaka wrote: > Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: > > =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 > =app-foo/baz-2.3.4 amd64 x86 # will be stabilised on only amd64 and x86 I was doing this in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 24/11/16 19:41, Michael Palimaka wrote: > As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many > architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors > contributing to this, but today I'd like to address three specific > problems that unnecessarily delay develop

[gentoo-dev] Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors contributing to this, but today I'd like to address three specific problems that unnecessarily delay developers actioning those requests.: 1. There's no easy

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emulation/ganeti-instance-debian-etch

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka (24 Nov 2016) # Discontinued upstream, hosted on googlecode, no reverse dependencies. # Use app-emulation/ganeti-instance-debootstrap instead. # Bug 598968. Masked for removal in 30 days. app-emulation/ganeti-instance-debian-etch

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/recorder

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka (24 Nov 2016) # Discontinued upstream, hosted on googlecode, no reverse dependencies. # Masked for removal in 30 days. app-cdr/recorder

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-cpp/gtkmm-utils

2016-11-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka (24 Nov 2016) # Discontinued upstream, hosted on googlecode, no reverse dependencies. # Bug 575578. Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-cpp/gtkmm-utils