On 25/11/16 15:54, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 > Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: >> >> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 >> =app-foo/baz-2.3.4 amd64 x86 # will be stabilised on only amd64 and x86 > > I was doing this in the past, but there's a reason I stopped: > > Bugzilla-enforced wordwrap ( at least, this is very strict on the > bugzilla-email relay ) > >> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 > > Could become more like > >> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, >> arm, and x86 > > > A literal example of an email I received for a bug I filed ( via an alias ) > is attached. > > > The example I give did not render poorly on bugzilla > ( https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599550 ), but I suspect people > who do AT probably prefer their notification emails about needed AT not > to be useless. >
Does it matter if it gets wrapped a bit strangely in an email? Nobody should be actioning a stabilisation request based on the contents of a bugmail, as it doesn't necessarily reflect the most up-to-date information.
