I recently added subject ebuild with a new libressl use flag.
Unfortunately I don't have a libressl system to test with and don't
really have the time right now to spin one up just for this :(. I was
wondering if one of the devs working with libressl would be kind enough
to make sure this at least
On 21 May 2016 17:08, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> >> The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in
> >> src_prepare(). It's easier with awk rather than sed.
> >
> > again, provide an example. one or two uncommon use cases doesn't justify
> > being add
# Andreas K. Hüttel (21 May 2016)
# Unmaintained since 2011, needs old webkit-gtk:2 slot that has
# security issues, no consumers in tree, bug 573092
# Removal in 30 days
dev-perl/Gtk2-WebKit
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
---
eclass/tests/rebar_fix_include_path.sh | 159 +
eclass/tests/rebar_remove_deps.sh | 99
eclass/tests/rebar_set_vsn.sh | 115
3 files changed, 373 insertions(+)
create mode 1
On 05/06/2016 08:25 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> This was only necessary when we ran phases in parallel.
> Also, PMS says this variable should not be modified.
> ---
> eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distuti
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
It is an eclass providing functions to build Erlang/OTP projects using
dev-util/rebar. All packages in upcoming category dev-erlang are going
to use this eclass.
---
eclass/rebar.eclass | 223
1 file changed, 223 inser
Michał Górny writes:
>> +# Run rebar with verbose flag. Die on failure.
>> +erebar() {
>> +debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "${@}"
>> +
>> +(( $# > 0 )) || die 'erebar: at least one target is required'
>
> Why not [[ $# -gt 0 ]]? It's the first time I see someone using (( ))
> for conditio
Michał Górny writes:>
>> +# Following commands should always succeed unless something weird is
>> going
>> +# on.
>> +cat "${tmpf}" >"${f}" || die 'failed to replace source file' || return
>> +rm "${tmpf}" || die "failed to remove temporary file"
>
> Any reason not to use mv here?
On Sat, 21 May 2016 14:26:00 +0100
aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
>
> It is an eclass providing functions to build Erlang/OTP projects using
> dev-util/rebar. All packages in upcoming category dev-erlang are going
> to use this eclass.
> ---
> eclass/rebar.eclass | 217
>
On Sat, 21 May 2016 14:49:41 +0100
aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
>
> awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
> desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
> look to the caller editing happens in place.
>
> New vers
On Fri, 6 May 2016 09:25:50 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> This was only necessary when we ran phases in parallel.
> Also, PMS says this variable should not be modified.
> ---
> eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/e
On Sun, 15 May 2016 11:30:00 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Do not apply PATCHES and user patches (either via the EAPI 6 default or
> pre-EAPI 5 code) when DISTUTILS_OPTIONAL is being used. In this case,
> distutils functions are usually called conditionally, in a subdirectory,
> while both PATCHES
On Sat, 21 May 2016 11:00:08 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 May 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I see the following possibilities:
>
> > 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter
> > how tiny they are. Maintainers are required to keep IUSE up-to-date
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote
> I see the following possibilities:
>
> 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter how
> tiny they are. Maintainers are required to keep IUSE up-to-date
> and users are forced to rebuild a lot. This is also a Q
On 05/21/2016 06:08 PM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
>>> The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in
>>> src_prepare(). It's easier with awk rather than sed.
>>
>> again, provide an example. one or two uncommon use cases doesn't justify
>> being added
Mike Frysinger writes:
>> The same "sed -i" is used. I have some configs to edit in place in
>> src_prepare(). It's easier with awk rather than sed.
>
> again, provide an example. one or two uncommon use cases doesn't justify
> being added to eutils.
See rebar.eclass review where it is used. Lat
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-misc/astrolog
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
dev-db/freetds
dev-db/libiodbc
dev-libs/libxdiff
net-libs/rabbitmq-c
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
dev-python/edpwd
net-mail/mhonarc-gentoo
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
games-simulation/corsix-th
media-sound/gnaural
On 20 May 2016 21:09, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > On 18 May 2016 22:25, aide...@gentoo.org wrote:
> >> awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
> >> desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
> >> look to the call
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
net-misc/tightvnc
sys-fs/davl
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-cdr/cdck
dev-util/heaptrack
sys-process/wait_on_pid
> On Sat, 21 May 2016, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of
> them, the following packages are now up for grabs:
> app-editors/joe
> dev-lang/ucblogo
> www-apache/mod_limitipconn
The Emacs team will take app-editors/joe unless someone else wan
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
look to the caller editing happens in place.
New version of gawk (not stabilized yet) does support editing in place
but forcing u
aide...@gentoo.org writes:
> +tbegin "preserves permissions"
> +
> +cd "$(emktemp -d)"
tests-common.sh already creates tmp directory, so better would be:
cd "${tmpdir}" || tend $?
-- Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
media-sound/aacgain
net-dialup/dtrace
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
dev-lang/io
dev-lang/srf
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
It is an eclass providing functions to build Erlang/OTP projects using
dev-util/rebar. All packages in upcoming category dev-erlang are going
to use this eclass.
---
eclass/rebar.eclass | 217
1 file changed, 217 inser
Because of the current maintainer not having time to take care of them,
the following packages are now up for grabs:
app-editors/joe
dev-lang/ucblogo
www-apache/mod_limitipconn
From: Amadeusz Żołnowski
awk doesn't have the -i option like sed and if editing file in place is
desired, additional steps are required. eawk uses tmp file to make it
look to the caller editing happens in place.
New version of gawk (not stabilized yet) does support editing in place
but forcing u
On 05/21/2016 03:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> I see the following possibilities:
>
#2 is ugly and requires a special case due to a bad choice of variable
name; #4 will never work.
> 3. We remove LINGUAS from USE_EXPAND and stop using it. If ebuilds have
> a good reason to use flags for local
Amadeusz Żołnowski writes:
> Indeed. So one of these:
>
> a) eawk
> b) eawk --
> c) eawk --
Ups, actually (c) wouldn't be correct either, so only (a) and (b) and
I'd just stick to (a) to not complicate things.
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On Sat, 21 May 2016, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 21 May 2016 at 21:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Why would users have to rebuild more often? Language support in a
>> package will change with a version bump, when they must rebuild in
>> any case.
> But changing IUSE would cause users to cause r
On 21 May 2016 at 21:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Why would users have to rebuild more often? Language support in a
> package will change with a version bump, when they must rebuild in any
> case.
But changing IUSE would cause users to cause rebuilds under --new-use,
even though no actual changes
On Fri, 20 May 2016 21:47:56 -0700
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell
> wrote:
> > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > some devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages
> > that they already maintain?
>
> No
> On Sat, 21 May 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> I see the following possibilities:
> 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter
> how tiny they are. Maintainers are required to keep IUSE up-to-date
> and users are forced to rebuild a lot.
Why would users have to rebuild
Michał Górny writes:
>> >> + [[ -d include ]] && doins -r include
>> >> + [[ -d bin ]] && for bin in bin/*; do dobin "$bin"; done
>> >
>> > Please don't do inlines like this.
>>
>> Is there a particular problem with this?
>
> Readability and maintainability. At some point someone may want to
On 21 May 2016 at 19:41, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Those of you who read my blog post on LINGUAS [1] may already know
> what's going on. For those who didn't, short summary:
>
> In EAPI 5 and newer, all variables listed in USE_EXPAND are supposed to
> be unconditionally exported with thei
Hello,
Those of you who read my blog post on LINGUAS [1] may already know
what's going on. For those who didn't, short summary:
In EAPI 5 and newer, all variables listed in USE_EXPAND are supposed to
be unconditionally exported with their values reduced to enabled USE
flags listed in IUSE. In pa
Matt Turner posted on Fri, 20 May 2016 21:47:56 -0700 as excerpted:
> He's saying people add new packages and then speculatively add keywords
> for a bunch of architectures that they haven't tested. This causes
> unnecessary packages to be keyworded on archs that don't want them and
> can hardly a
On Sat, 21 May 2016 00:06:01 +0100
Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
> >> +rebar_src_install() {
> >> + debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "${@}"
> >> +
> >> + local bin
> >> + local dest="$(get_erl_libs)/${P}"
> >> +
> >> + insinto "${dest}"
> >> + doins -r ebin
> >> + [[ -d include ]] && doins -r i
42 matches
Mail list logo
