On 19 Apr 2016 08:15, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger:
> > > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > > > So why on
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:41:06 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger:
> > > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream
On 19 Apr 2016 04:21, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger:
> > On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not
> > > using
> >
> > not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* mo
On 18/04/16 16:47, Michał Górny wrote:
> This is invalid. Replacing invalid package names with other invalid
> names is no fix. It is ugly Gentoo-style hackery which proves that
> developers prefer trying randomly changing something until QA check
> doesn't trigger over reading the documentation. A
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.04.2016 kell 12:38, kirjutas Mike Frysinger:
> On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not
> > using
>
> not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this
> direction. Gentoo
> is simply accelerat
On 18/04/16 21:44, Jonas Jelten wrote:
> Ohai!
>
> Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/
>
> It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools.
> https://phacility.com/phabricator/
>
> Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using
> phabrica
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:45:31 -0400
Brian Evans wrote:
> On 4/18/2016 1:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:31:08 -0400
> > Brian Evans wrote:
> >
> >> The point of this entry is to assign bugs when a certain condition
> >> exists. The person/project is not responsible other
On 4/18/2016 1:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:31:08 -0400
> Brian Evans wrote:
>
>> The point of this entry is to assign bugs when a certain condition
>> exists. The person/project is not responsible otherwise.
>
> It's GLEP 68. restrict="" must be EAPI 0 which means no USE
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:31:08 -0400
Brian Evans wrote:
> On 4/18/2016 11:34 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:33 + (UTC)
> > "Patrice Clement" wrote:
> >
> >> commit: 912a9f1e2ed5717a7669861b4978dfaf868c5ae7
> >> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> >> Author
On 4/18/2016 11:34 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:33 + (UTC)
> "Patrice Clement" wrote:
>
>> commit: 912a9f1e2ed5717a7669861b4978dfaf868c5ae7
>> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
>> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:33:40 2016 +
>> Commit: Patrice Clement gen
On 16 Apr 2016 09:23, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So why on earth are we applying a random patch that upstream is not
> using
not everyone uses glibc, and glibc *is* moving in this direction. Gentoo
is simply accelerating the change ... otherwise glibc will take longer to
do the actual migration. pac
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:44:00 +0200
Jonas Jelten wrote:
> Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/
>
> It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools.
> https://phacility.com/phabricator/
>
> Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using
> p
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: b6f6ee40596c7a17fbd4bf9a37d0f1c0a1e98e49
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:48:33 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:35 2016 +000
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: dbc8fee7ab7851d6d9e236b85d22e7db5690ebb9
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:54:23 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:39 2016 +000
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: d43acba31bb5d4f07e59479cd5728abc9367a9ca
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:46:09 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:25 2016 +000
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:33 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: 912a9f1e2ed5717a7669861b4978dfaf868c5ae7
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:33:40 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:57:59 2016 +000
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:43:55 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: d527fc60dac82d4785fca1cca30c1aecbc7506b7
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 09:12:02 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 09:28:28 2016 +000
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC)
"Patrice Clement" wrote:
> commit: 4f2477ca1ab07969bae57e7b47e8b7a5ba9a6050
> Author: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Mon Apr 18 06:35:31 2016 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Mon Apr 18 07:58:13 2016 +000
On 04/18/2016 09:44 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> Two trends struck out at me, and assuming everything mentioned ( or
> linked in the related GHC entry[0] ) is still true:
>
They are. Most of the Haskell standard library is still undocumented. If
anyone thinks Phabricator is a good idea, go docume
On 19 April 2016 at 01:19, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> References:
> [0]
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/f74961c953d5ffedd1af9a67fdda6407
Based on the comments in this thread, I'd say I was not entirely
unfounded in being pessimistic.
Two trends struck out at me, and assumin
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Jonas Jelten wrote:
> Ohai!
>
> Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/
> It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools.
>
> Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using
> phabricator, it c
On 2016-04-18 15:10, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 18 April 2016 at 23:44, Jonas Jelten wrote:
>> especially to dump bugzilla.
>
> Dumping bugzilla at this time would be a regression really. "Lets just
> discard millions of bugs and their history and important context" is
> not really an option for a
On 04/18/2016 03:10 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 18 April 2016 at 23:44, Jonas Jelten wrote:
>> especially to dump bugzilla.
>
> If there was a way for somebody to informally set up a phabricator
> instance in a non-committal manner that could be used merely for
> review purposes, that'd be n
On 18 April 2016 at 23:44, Jonas Jelten wrote:
> especially to dump bugzilla.
Dumping bugzilla at this time would be a regression really. "Lets just
discard millions of bugs and their history and important context" is
not really an option for a web accessible opensource project with lots
of inbou
Ohai!
Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/
It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools.
https://phacility.com/phabricator/
Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using
phabricator, it could also be very beneficial for gentoo.
https:
25 matches
Mail list logo
