On 04/18/2016 03:10 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 18 April 2016 at 23:44, Jonas Jelten <j...@stusta.net> wrote: >> especially to dump bugzilla. >
> If there was a way for somebody to informally set up a phabricator > instance in a non-committal manner that could be used merely for > review purposes, that'd be nice. Indeed, kensington already did some experimentation on this this a while back[0], but I'm not sure what what lessons were learned from it. My personal 2c is that there is a very big difference between a read-only review tool and something more deeply integrates when considering security. References: [0] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/f74961c953d5ffedd1af9a67fdda6407 -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
