On 18/04/16 00:50, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Does base-system object if I bump it to EAPI=5 before I commit the
> ssl-cert patch? I'll start stabilization too obviously.
>
Please do.
20160415-16:03 johu bbd3c42
Additions:
app-admin/packagekit-qt 20160416-11:47 johu c4ba182
app-crypt/signify 20160417-11:03 patrickf328257
app-doc/cppman 20160415-15:18 monsieurp a4a268c
app-emulation
On 4/17/16 4:28 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 4/17/16 4:15 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 16-04-2016 21:05:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Congratulations! You've just committed an invalid dependency that is
>>> going to cause true mayhem on every package using the eclass.
>>
>> I assume you
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:37:35 -0400
> Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> > On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> >
>> > The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
>> > autotools-multilib eclasses, which are
# Patrice Clement (17 Apr 2016)
# Unmaintained ebuilds (EAPI 0!) which don't compile with Java 8.
# Removal in 30 days. See bug 580094.
dev-java/freehep-export
dev-java/freehep-graphics2d
dev-java/freehep-graphicsio
dev-java/freehep-graphicsio-emf
dev-java/freehep-graphicsio-java
dev-java/freehep-
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:45:08 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
> >
> >> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >>
> >> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {
> >> xo
On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 10:37:35 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
> > autotools-multilib eclasses, which are banned in EAPI 6.
> >
> > This patchset attempts to remove any
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
>>>
On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
>> autotools-multilib eclasses, which are banned in EAPI 6.
>>
>> This patchset attempts to remove any trace o
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {
>>> xorg-2_
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
>
> Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
>
>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {
>> xorg-2_src_compile() {
>>debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "$@"
>>
>> +l
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
> autotools-multilib eclasses, which are banned in EAPI 6.
>
> This patchset attempts to remove any trace of autotools-utils from ebuilds
> using xorg-2.
>
> Note that I
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {
> xorg-2_src_compile() {
>debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "$@"
>
> +local makeargs=( "$@" )
> +
>if [[ ${XORG_MULTILIB} == yes ]]; the
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66
---
x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild | 4 ++--
x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r3.ebuild | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild
b/x11-libs/xpyb/xpyb-1.3.1-r2.ebuild
index c563aa3..50243a4 100644
---
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66
---
x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild | 7 ---
x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r2.ebuild | 7 ---
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild
b/x11-apps/xauth/xauth-1.0.9-r1.ebuild
index ed1c75e..385
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p66
---
x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild | 6 +++---
x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0.ebuild| 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild
b/x11-libs/glamor/glamor-0.6.0-r1.ebuild
index 453e14
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p3
---
x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.10.ebuild | 19 +--
x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.11.ebuild | 19 +--
x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.8-r3.ebuild | 19 +--
x11-proto/xcb-proto/xcb-proto-1.9-r1.ebuild | 19
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p64
---
x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.10.ebuild| 16
x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.11-r1.ebuild | 16
x11-apps/intel-gpu-tools/intel-gpu-tools-1.12.ebuild| 16
3 files changed, 24 i
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.28_p64
---
x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.12.4-r5.ebuild | 4 ++--
x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.12.4-r7.ebuild | 4 ++--
x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.15.2-r2.ebuild | 4 ++--
x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.15.2-r4.ebuild | 4 ++--
x11-base/xorg-serv
The xorg-2 eclass currently uses the deprecated autotools-utils and
autotools-multilib eclasses, which are banned in EAPI 6.
This patchset attempts to remove any trace of autotools-utils from ebuilds
using xorg-2.
Note that I am touching stable ebuilds here to avoid forking an "xorg-3"
eclass. If
---
eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 73 +++-
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass
index 437265a..f6cf1f9 100644
--- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass
@@ -43,12 +43,14 @@ fi
On 4/17/16 4:15 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 16-04-2016 21:05:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Congratulations! You've just committed an invalid dependency that is
>> going to cause true mayhem on every package using the eclass.
>
> I assume you've taken proper actions to mitigate this.
>
>> Bu
On 16-04-2016 21:05:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Congratulations! You've just committed an invalid dependency that is
> going to cause true mayhem on every package using the eclass.
I assume you've taken proper actions to mitigate this.
> But why would anyone send patches for review, or even s
23 matches
Mail list logo
