> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
>>
>>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -487,10 +497,17 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {
>>> xorg-2_src_compile() {
>>> debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "$@"
>>>
>>> + local makeargs=( "$@" )
>>> +
>>> if [[ ${XORG_MULTILIB} == yes ]]; then
>>> - autotools-multilib_src_compile "$@"
>>> + if ! declare -f multilib_src_compile >/dev/null; then
>>> + multilib_src_compile() {
>>> + emake "${makeargs[@]}"
>>> + }
>>> + fi
>>> + multilib-minimal_src_compile
>>> else
>>> - autotools-utils_src_compile "$@"
>>> + emake "${makeargs[@]}"
>>> fi
>>> }
>>
>> Does the src_compile code need to be as complex as this? Why not just a 'if
>> $XORG_MULTILIB ; then multilib-minimal_src_compile "$@"; else emake "$@"; fi
>> '?
>>
>> ...or even 'default' instead of emake...?
>
> multilib-mininmal_src_compile and default_src_comple do not provide
> any method to pass arguments to emake. If I recall correctly, there is
> at least one ebuild that needs to do so.
>
That would do it then...
mgorny how difficult do you think it would be to pass extra "$@" bits through
to the default multilib_src_compile? Or does that just call 'default' too...
(can't check right now)
