Dnia 2015-09-20, o godz. 22:32:54
Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The
> second one is Gentoo specific.
>
> Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries?
>
> What I see currently is that our e
The git script does NOT work correctly with a bare repo :-(
This was it, if you look at the mail headers.
X-Puppet: ../find-git-adds-and-removals-mailer.sh 1442188800 1442793600
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:05:02AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that wer
Removals:
dev-db/virtuoso-odbc2015-09-17 11:18:03 johu49c964c
dev-db/virtuoso-server 2015-09-17 11:18:40 johu0b8e111
dev-lang/nacl-toolchain-newlib 2015-09-20 20:10:26 phajdan.jr c6d4012
dev-libs/cloog-ppl 2015-09-20 23:45:52 v
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-09-20 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
Additions:
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
On Monday, September 21, 2015 12:00:28 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:54:24 -0400
> Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:33:34 PM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > > On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:53:25 -0400
> > > Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Satu
On 9/20/15 1:23 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
[0] I am pretty sure some arches will want to opt out of this
scheme, at least for some more critical packages.
ALLARCHES shouldn't be used on critical packages.
Exactly. So suppose that we do stabilize a non-critical package on an
arch where it fails.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:54:24 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:33:34 PM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:53:25 -0400
> > Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:31:11 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > Dnia 2015-09-18,
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 11:33:34 PM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:53:25 -0400
> Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:31:11 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 2015-09-18, o godz. 20:09:16
> > > Fernando Rodriguez napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Githu
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:53:25 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:31:11 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-09-18, o godz. 20:09:16
> > Fernando Rodriguez napisał(a):
> >
> > > Github allows editting of comments in pull requests. Is there a
> > > policy regarding
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 7:31:11 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-18, o godz. 20:09:16
> Fernando Rodriguez napisał(a):
>
> > Github allows editting of comments in pull requests. Is there a policy
> > regarding that? I've noticed a comment disappear which makes the rest of
the
> >
Hi,
On 09/20/2015 11:14 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 22:32 +0200, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The
>> second one is Gentoo specific.
>>
>> Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and
On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 22:32 +0200, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The
> second one is Gentoo specific.
>
> Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries?
>
> What I see currently is that our ebuild
On 2015-09-18 04:58, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> 2.
> Any suggestion how to do this? repoman has a manifest-check function but that
> is
> not functioning (bug filed). Any other tool around? Perhaps using pkgcheck?
With regards to pkgcheck, run the following in a configured gentoo repo
to generate a l
Our bug queue has 84 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
Hi,
the first question is addressed both to llvm-dev and gentoo-dev. The
second one is Gentoo specific.
Is there any possibility to build LLVM both as static and shared libraries?
What I see currently is that our ebuild makes LLVM to build shared libs
unconditionally. Is there a possibility (if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 20/09/15 19:41, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:58:22AM +0200, Justin (jlec) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there are quite a number of Manifest still not containing one or
>> more of the three hashes. I would like to update them as
Hi!
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:23:21 +0200 Tobias Klausmann
> wrote:
> > arch_A maintainer sees ALLARCHES keyworded bug, and tests
> > everything on A. Upon keywording and running repoman, she
> > finds that two other arches need additional deps. What to do?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:58:22AM +0200, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there are quite a number of Manifest still not containing one or more of the
> three hashes. I would like to update them as far as we can download the
> sources.
540 of 17841 Manifest files have the problem, about 3%.
Qui
On 20.09.2015 18:57, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/20/2015 06:47 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> On 20.09.2015 16:26, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl.
>>>
>>> That's not possible, because in order to intr
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:57 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/20/2015 06:47 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> On 20.09.2015 16:26, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl.
>>>
>>> That's not possible, because in
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 13:23:21 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> arch_A maintainer sees ALLARCHES keyworded bug, and tests
> everything on A. Upon keywording and running repoman, she finds
> that two other arches need additional deps. What to do?
Use common sense? This isn't brain surgery.
> If an
On 09/20/2015 06:47 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> On 20.09.2015 16:26, hasufell wrote:
>> On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>> Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl.
>>
>> That's not possible, because in order to introduce the USE flag, we have
>> to break the
On 20.09.2015 16:26, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl.
>
> That's not possible, because in order to introduce the USE flag, we have
> to break the dep-graph on ~arch temporarily (for 'libressl' USE
On 9/20/15 8:59 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:49:24 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Alexis Ballier
wrote:
Yes, that's what gnome team is doing with gtk2 vs gtk3; however, I'm
not sure how much work it is. Only package I know of providing
differen
On 09/20/2015 03:27 PM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> Please stop introducing further tree-wide changes regarding libressl.
That's not possible, because in order to introduce the USE flag, we have
to break the dep-graph on ~arch temporarily (for 'libressl' USE flag
only ofc), because of circular deps.
I
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 9:27 AM, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> On 19.09.2015 23:04, hasufell wrote:
>> Friends,
>>
>> I think it is time to import LibreSSL[0]. There are not many packages
>> left that don't compile OOTB and those can be patched (e.g. dev-lang/ruby).
>>
>> My idea would be:
>>
>> 1. import
On 19.09.2015 23:04, hasufell wrote:
> Friends,
>
> I think it is time to import LibreSSL[0]. There are not many packages
> left that don't compile OOTB and those can be patched (e.g. dev-lang/ruby).
>
> My idea would be:
>
> 1. import "dev-libs/libressl" (this will block dev-libs/openssl) and
>
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:49:24 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Alexis Ballier
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's what gnome team is doing with gtk2 vs gtk3; however, I'm
> > not sure how much work it is. Only package I know of providing
> > different slots depending on what
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 7:14 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/20/2015 08:07 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:04:14 +0200 hasufell wrote:
>>> Friends,
>>>
>>> I think it is time to import LibreSSL[0]. There are not many packages
>>> left that don't compile OOTB and
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> Yes, that's what gnome team is doing with gtk2 vs gtk3; however, I'm
> not sure how much work it is. Only package I know of providing
> different slots depending on what it's built upon is webkit-gtk.
>
> I can't imagine every library usin
Hi!
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> The ALLARCHES keyword is out since some time. For who does not
> remeber, the announcement is here [1]
>
> So, if an arch developer tests the package(s) on one
> architecture, he is allowed to stabilize/keyword for all.
This can lead to an inte
On 09/20/2015 08:07 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:04:14 +0200 hasufell wrote:
>> Friends,
>>
>> I think it is time to import LibreSSL[0]. There are not many packages
>> left that don't compile OOTB and those can be patched (e.g. dev-lang/ruby).
>>
>> My idea w
On 09/20/2015 10:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>
> Dnia 20 września 2015 11:26:04 CEST, Jeroen Roovers
> napisał(a):
>> On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:09:16 -0400
>> Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> Github allows editting of comments in pull requests. Is there a
>>> policy regarding that? I've noticed
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 12:17:11 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 10:22:59 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > My idea would be:
> > > >
> > > > 1. import "dev-libs/libressl" (this will block
> > > > dev-libs/openssl) and introduce the global USE flag "libressl"
> > > > with the f
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:24:25 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Unfortunately some people forget to look at the KEYWORDS field and
> stabilize the package only for one architecture.
Funny to see how you use "forget" here. How about, laugh at and ignore?
> At this point I'm asking maintainer(s) to
commit 1e714de7382390bc75eb0a939f8dfcaea39763da
Author: Ian Delaney
Date: Sun Sep 20 17:31:41 2015 +0800
pmask defunct packages of net-firewall/shorewall
listed in bug #560392
net-firewall/shorewall-core
net-firewall/shorewall-init
net-firewall/shorewall-lite
net-firewall/shorewall6
Dnia 20 września 2015 11:26:04 CEST, Jeroen Roovers
napisał(a):
>On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:09:16 -0400
>Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> Github allows editting of comments in pull requests. Is there a
>> policy regarding that? I've noticed a comment disappear which makes
>> the rest of the conversa
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 20:09:16 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> Github allows editting of comments in pull requests. Is there a
> policy regarding that? I've noticed a comment disappear which makes
> the rest of the conversation seem out of place.
My personal policy is to completely ignore anythi
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 10:22:59 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > My idea would be:
> > >
> > > 1. import "dev-libs/libressl" (this will block dev-libs/openssl) and
> > > introduce the global USE flag "libressl" with the following
> > > description:
> >
> > Please try to avoid such block, e.g. insta
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >>So what would pkg-1.4_alpha1_p20 look like if you convert it to a form
>> >>that uses ~?
>> >
>> > You shouldn't start with old gentoo version but with whatever upstream
>> > uses. The goal is that the scheme is really upstream friendly.
>
Dnia 2015-09-20, o godz. 16:40:16
konsolebox napisał(a):
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Here's my old proposal: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526456
> >
> > Dnia 19 września 2015 14:59:35 CEST, konsolebox
> > napisał(a):
> >>On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 6:55 P
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:12:06 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager,
> in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every
> single repository?
>
> Web projects tend to assume that they're the only application/user
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Here's my old proposal: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=526456
>
> Dnia 19 września 2015 14:59:35 CEST, konsolebox
> napisał(a):
>>On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny
>>wrote:
>>> Dnia 19 września 2015 12:27:32 CEST, kons
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:07:09 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 23:04:14 +0200 hasufell wrote:
> > Friends,
> >
> > I think it is time to import LibreSSL[0]. There are not many
> > packages left that don't compile OOTB and those can be patched
> > (e.g. dev-lang/
44 matches
Mail list logo
