Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Kent Fredric
On 22 February 2015 at 18:06, Gordon Pettey wrote: > > Protect the permissions on the files, not the editors - there's always > another way to get content into a file if you have write permission to it. > If you try to do that with a g+xo-x, then you're going to have to do the > same for every si

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Gordon Pettey
On 02/21/2015 01:35 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Personally, I think that controlling who is allowed to run certain > types of applications via group membership is a great idea. We > should introduce that approach for other applications too. How > about an "editors" group? Text editors are

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: app-emulation/fig

2015-02-21 Thread Alex Brandt
# Alex Brandt (21 Feb 2015) # Upstream renamed to docker-compose for all future releases app-emulation/fig -- Alex Brandt Cloud Evangelist for Rackspace and Developer for Gentoo http://blog.alunduil.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Kent Fredric
On 22 February 2015 at 15:35, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > > > Personally, I think that controlling who is allowed to run certain > > types of applications via group membership is a great idea. We > > should introduce that approach for other applications too. How > > about an "editors" group? Text

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Daniel Campbell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/21/2015 01:35 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> When this becomes more widespread, what action are users urged >> to take in order to "migrate" to the new system? Should our >> everyday user acco

Re: [gentoo-dev] SCIM - terminal spreadsheet - sc fork

2015-02-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Andrés Martinelli wrote: > Hello there! > As many of you already pointed, the spreadsheet app "SCIM" I am working on, > collides in its name with Smart Common Input Method. > I decided that is time to change its name to avoid problems and to get lost > with the other. > > What are your suggestions

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bountry or contract work

2015-02-21 Thread C Bergström
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:32:58 +0700 > C Bergström wrote: > >> PathScale is interested to hire a full time dev (for at least a few >> months) in order to bring pkgcore back to life. >> >> General goals >> 1) Make it capable of parsing/handling

Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bountry or contract work

2015-02-21 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 22 Feb 2015 03:32:58 +0700 C Bergström wrote: > PathScale is interested to hire a full time dev (for at least a few > months) in order to bring pkgcore back to life. > > General goals > 1) Make it capable of parsing/handling the current portage tree (We'll > contribute all this work upst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 21. Februar 2015, 20:16:31 schrieb hasufell: > What did the council say again about the functionality of the team? > What's the argumentation to not do anything, except deciding policies > over it's head? functionality != willingness to interact with others (seems to be a recurring p

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-21, o godz. 20:49:04 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > >> SRC_URI="ftp://emboss.open-bio.org/pub/EMBOSS/${EF}.tar.gz -> > >> embassy-${EN}-${PVR}.tar.gz" > > > > Why PVR? Why not just ${EF}? :P > > Upstream sucks and updates packages without version bumping. so we > need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/21/2015 04:05 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401237 >> >> because Nagios needs libltdl to build. Is that still a problem? > > Yes, it is. Because dev-libs/libltdl. > Thanks, it looks like I investigated the bug on the same day that package was commi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-21, o godz. 14:43:05 Michael Orlitzky napisał(a): > On 02/21/2015 03:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> DEPEND="${RDEPEND} > >>sys-devel/libtool > > > > Using system-wide libtool is horrendously broken. This is something for > > upstream to fix (like they should start using a

[gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bountry or contract work

2015-02-21 Thread C Bergström
PathScale is interested to hire a full time dev (for at least a few months) in order to bring pkgcore back to life. General goals 1) Make it capable of parsing/handling the current portage tree (We'll contribute all this work upstream/open source) 2) Improve the web based front-end https://github

[gentoo-dev] Fonts project meeting and elections

2015-02-21 Thread Ben de Groot
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date and/or time will be suggested by people who want to attend. There hasn't been much activity in the fonts area o

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
On 21/02/15 20:36, Michał Górny wrote: >> # @ECLASS-VARIABLE: EBO_EXTRA_ECONF # @DEFAULT_UNSET # >> @DESCRIPTION: # Extra config options passed to econf, similar to >> EXTRA_ECONF. > > Similar as in how? That it must not be used in ebuilds but in > make.conf? Probably missleading name. All the co

[gentoo-dev] Fonts project meeting and elections

2015-02-21 Thread Ben de Groot
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date and/or time will be suggested by people who want to attend. There hasn't been much activity in the fonts area o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 02/21/2015 03:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> DEPEND="${RDEPEND} >> sys-devel/libtool > > Using system-wide libtool is horrendously broken. This is something for > upstream to fix (like they should start using a sane build system) > but if you really want to commit it like this, already o

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
On 21/02/15 20:19, hasufell wrote: > Justin Lecher (jlec): >> Hi all, >> >> we got a nice user contribution which fixes several bugs and >> potential security implications. As a result we need to have >> changes to the emboss eclass. >> >> The new eclass is simply move forward to use autools-util

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-21, o godz. 15:46:31 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > # $Header: $ > > # @ECLASS: emboss-r1.eclass > # @MAINTAINER: > # sci-biol...@gentoo.org > # j...@gentoo.org > # t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-22, o godz. 02:19:18 Ben de Groot napisał(a): > > neovim: > > > >> # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation > >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > >> # $Header: $ > >> > >> EAPI=5 > >> inherit cmake-utils flag-o-matic > >> > >> DESCRIPTION="Vim's reb

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Tim Harder
On 2015-02-21 13:19, Ben de Groot wrote: > > neovim: > > > >> # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation > >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > >> # $Header: $ > >> > >> EAPI=5 > >> inherit cmake-utils flag-o-matic > >> > >> DESCRIPTION="Vim's rebirth for the 21st ce

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread hasufell
Justin Lecher (jlec): > Hi all, > > we got a nice user contribution which fixes several bugs and potential > security implications. As a result we need to have changes to the emboss > eclass. > > The new eclass is simply move forward to use autools-utils.eclass which > results in quite some incom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread hasufell
Ulrich Mueller: >> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, hasufell wrote: > >> Has this been done in cooperation with the games team? If not, why? > > The games team is in CC of bug 537580 and no team member has > commented. > >> I think QA should make a clear statement if they are acting above a >> projects

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Ben de Groot
On 21 February 2015 at 16:18, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Don't you think it sucks to review a few ebuilds in one e-mail? :) No. :) > neovim: > >> # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation >> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 >> # $Header: $ >> >> EAPI=5 >> inher

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015, hasufell wrote: > Has this been done in cooperation with the games team? If not, why? The games team is in CC of bug 537580 and no team member has commented. > I think QA should make a clear statement if they are acting above a > projects head and why they had to do s

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 2/20/15 12:10 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > At the suggestion of radhermit, I'm putting my neovim & deps ebuilds > up here for review, before I commit them to the official tree. Do you > see any possible improvements? Overall the ebuilds look nice and clean. Some ideas: - consider asking libtermke

[gentoo-dev] RFC: new eclass emboss-r1 (obsoletes emboss and embassy eclass)

2015-02-21 Thread Justin Lecher (jlec)
Hi all, we got a nice user contribution which fixes several bugs and potential security implications. As a result we need to have changes to the emboss eclass. The new eclass is simply move forward to use autools-utils.eclass which results in quite some incompatibilities to the old one. Therefor

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread hasufell
Michał Górny: >> dev-lua/LuaBitOp >> dev-lua/lpeg >> dev-lua/lua-MessagePack" >> DEPEND="${CDEPEND} >> virtual/libiconv >> virtual/libintl" >> RDEPEND="${CDEPEND} >> perl? ( dev-lang/perl ) >> python? ( dev-python/neovim-python-client )" >> >> src_configure() { >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread hasufell
Ulrich Mueller: >> On Thu, 19 Feb 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> In yesterday's meeting the QA team has unanimously accepted the >> following policies (see bug 537580 for details): > >> 1. Directories /usr/games, /usr/games/bin, /usr/games/lib*, >>/usr/share/games, /var/games, /etc/game

[gentoo-dev] SCIM - terminal spreadsheet - sc fork

2015-02-21 Thread Andrés Martinelli
Hello there! As many of you already pointed, the spreadsheet app "SCIM" I am working on, collides in its name with Smart Common Input Method. I decided that is time to change its name to avoid problems and to get lost with the other. What are your suggestions? Thanks! Andrés M.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies for games dirs, new group "gamestat" for sgid binaries

2015-02-21 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015, Daniel Campbell wrote: > When this becomes more widespread, what action are users urged to > take in order to "migrate" to the new system? Should our everyday > user account be removed from the `games` group, and the group should > be removed altogether? Currently, user

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: distutils-r1.eclass python-utils-r1.eclass

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-02-20, o godz. 08:18:05 "Patrick Lauer (patrick)" napisał(a): > patrick 15/02/20 08:18:05 > > Modified: distutils-r1.eclass python-utils-r1.eclass > Log: > Revert random mgorny madness You've committed additional files yet didn't update the ChangeLog entry. Now t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] please review ebuilds for neovim and deps

2015-02-21 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, Don't you think it sucks to review a few ebuilds in one e-mail? :) neovim: > # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > # $Header: $ > > EAPI=5 > inherit cmake-utils flag-o-matic > > DESCRIPTION="Vim's rebirth for the 21st