On 18 October 2014 19:03, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Dude... what?
>
> If this is what's holding up a tinderbox run, add me to the bug template
> as a CC and I'll personally download and attach every log to bugzilla.
> If at some point we all decide this is super silly and embarrassing,
> perhaps
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 14:03 -0400, Michael Orlitzky escribió:
> On 10/18/2014 01:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Supposedly we always must attach files to bug reports to ensure they are
> > kept forever with that bug reports instead of relying on external
> > resources that could disappear in
On 10/18/2014 01:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Supposedly we always must attach files to bug reports to ensure they are
> kept forever with that bug reports instead of relying on external
> resources that could disappear in the future (or far future). If I don't
> misremember, flameeyes was paying
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 13:19 -0400, Michael Orlitzky escribió:
> On 10/18/2014 01:00 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > All the stack is at https://github.com/gentoo/tboxanalysis
> >
> > The opening of the bug report is done by a piece of meatware called
> > "me". The UI displays a link that I ca
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 18:00 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> All the stack is at https://github.com/gentoo/tboxanalysis
>
>
> The opening of the bug report is done by a piece of meatware called
> "me". The UI displays a link that I can click to pre-fill the bug
> report. The rest of the i
On 10/18/2014 01:00 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> All the stack is at https://github.com/gentoo/tboxanalysis
>
> The opening of the bug report is done by a piece of meatware called
> "me". The UI displays a link that I can click to pre-fill the bug
> report. The rest of the information is filled
All the stack is at https://github.com/gentoo/tboxanalysis
The opening of the bug report is done by a piece of meatware called "me".
The UI displays a link that I can click to pre-fill the bug report. The
rest of the information is filled in manually and submitted.
Also remember that the linked lo
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 14:15 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> If you write the code for that, be my guest. But the code is in Ruby
> and does not open the bug directly (only links to a pre-filled bug
> form).
>
>
> When I wrote it, Python was definitely not among my strong languages.
> Whi
On 10/18/14 07:56, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
On Sun Oct 12 01:27:38 2014 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/11/14 16:28, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell
wrote:
But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say "amd64
ok".
If there is general consensus that
If you write the code for that, be my guest. But the code is in Ruby and
does not open the bug directly (only links to a pre-filled bug form).
When I wrote it, Python was definitely not among my strong languages. While
I can probably write it now, I don't have the time.
As I said I'm happy to vol
El sáb, 18-10-2014 a las 12:35 +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> I can spend some time with the tinderbox on 4.9 but the maintainers
> will have to accept that the logs will be linked and not attached.
>
>
> (This being the main reason why I stopped bothering unless people
> asked me explicit
On Sun Oct 12 01:27:38 2014 Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 10/11/14 16:28, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell
> > wrote:
> > > But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say "amd64
> > > ok".
> > >
> > If there is general consensus that this is going
I can spend some time with the tinderbox on 4.9 but the maintainers will
have to accept that the logs will be linked and not attached.
(This being the main reason why I stopped bothering unless people asked me
explicitly, given how many times someone closed my bugs with NEEDINFO
because the logs w
On 10/13/14 1:38 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
> have you considered to stabilize gcc:4.9 instead possibly 4.9.2 ?
> I'm not really suggesting to do so, but seem that most of the problems
> of 4.9.1 are the same of 4.8.3 so maybe it's worth considering.
>
> Il 11/10/2014 13:57, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
14 matches
Mail list logo