On 10/13/14 1:38 AM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: > have you considered to stabilize gcc:4.9 instead possibly 4.9.2 ? > I'm not really suggesting to do so, but seem that most of the problems > of 4.9.1 are the same of 4.8.3 so maybe it's worth considering. > > Il 11/10/2014 13:57, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." ha scritto: >> We'll really need gcc-4.8 in stable within 6-12 weeks from now. Chromium >> starts making heavy use of C++11 language features, see >> <http://chromium-cpp.appspot.com/> . I don't realistically see us being >> able to just patch chromium to work around that. > > for 4.9.2 the 6-12 week window could be a problem
Yeah, I don't think we can go straight to 4.9 without the latter spending time in ~arch, and for now it's still hard masked. Paweł
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
