On 08/18/2013 11:13 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 13/08/13 08:21, heroxbd wrote:
>> Dear Fellows,
>>
>> Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
>> Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
>> in parallel to Android to drive the external H
On 13/08/13 08:21, heroxbd wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11
protocal, so that desktop applications can
It sounds very interesting! I would like to try that for testing in future.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:21 PM, heroxbd wrote:
> Dear Fellows,
>
> Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
> Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
> in para
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-08-18 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-python/tg-widgets-lightbox 2013-08-17 14:56:10 creffett
dev-python/tg-widgets-scriptaculous 2013-08-17 14:56:10 creffett
dev-perl/Date-
Dnia 2013-08-18, o godz. 18:39:56
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> 2. Should the function do automatic -p* detection, or should it
>default to -p1? Both would be overridable by an explicit -p*
>option. There are good arguments for either variant (see the
>above-mentioned bug).
I'm all fo
On 08/18/2013 12:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> The current epatch() would remain available in eutils.eclass for cases
> where its more advanced modes of operation are needed.
> ...
> 2. Should the function do automatic -p* detection, or should it
>default to -p1? Both would be overridable
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Rick "Zero Chaos" Farina wrote:
>> - support for PATCHES variable in a default src_install phase
> Isn't src_install a bit late for most patches?
This should read src_prepare, of course. Thanks.
Ulrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/2013 12:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
> manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
> - support for PATCHES variable in a default src_inst
Hi all,
For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
- support for PATCHES variable in a default src_install phase
- a function to apply user patches
In bug 463768 the conclusion so far was that implementing
