On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 08:13:23PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > > > On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > > On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be s
On 04/24/2013 06:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in
Open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/04/13 09:10 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
>> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in
>>> OpenRC. I
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 07:32:44PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman
How about someone decide which is the best version and keep it integrated
in OpenRC? There's no best version? diff the two of them and merge what
matters. I mean, how many distros do you know that have two sets of init
scripts *just* to configure networking? I know Gentoo is about choice, but
this
Michael Mol wrote:
> > I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
> > by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to.
>
> I was thinking something similar, actually, except you'd need
> something like this:
>
> 1. dev pushes to Gerrit
> 2. Gerrit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
>>
>>> Considering our default configuration ships sshd (an argument we don't
>>
On 04/24/2013 07:21 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
>> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
>
> I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
> by a CI system
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
>
> > Considering our default configuration ships sshd (an argument we don't
> > need to rehash here), it seems a bit silly to not ship networking
> > support by default. I'
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> Considering our default configuration ships sshd (an argument we don't
> need to rehash here), it seems a bit silly to not ship networking
> support by default. I'd rather not do it as part of the system set,
> though that would be co
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> Seems simple enough, as long as `repoman scan` runs quickly.
>
This is the key, because if a commit happens anywhere in your process,
your push will fail.
At first I thought you were suggesting a server-side hook. This
essentially has the same p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/04/13 11:46 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:54:07 William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:34:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
The issue is t
On 24/04/2013 18:01, William Hubbs wrote:
> robbat2 is the one who made the request. He wants to do a couple of
> things:
>
> 1) he wants to be able to have independent oldnet releases so he can get
> more features into the oldnet scripts and have his own development
> cycle.
>
> 2) He is also in
Any reason why a pre-commit hook can't be used?
Assuming that `git push -f` is never used and that every committer uses
it, pre-commit is guaranteed to be executed on all commits that are
pushed to the remote.
pre-commit can check QA and even automate changelog, so instead of:
$ cvs update
$ cvs
Am 24.04.2013 19:15, schrieb Zac Medico:
> On 04/24/2013 02:51 AM, René Neumann wrote:
>> As more and more packages seem to (mis)use USE_EXPAND: Can we get the
>> possibility to set this directly in package.use? Having to write
>> 'claws_mail_plugins_foo' does not help readability, and setting it i
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:16:06 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* scripts
> > will no longer be included. I am going to call the separate package that
> > includes these s
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:16:06 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* scripts
> will no longer be included. I am going to call the separate package that
> includes these scripts gentoo-oldnet.
Aside all the other, please don't name it like this
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:38:44 +0200
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> the upcoming Claws Mail release will have no separation between
> internal plugins (stuff that is built on mail-client/claws-mail with
> USE="crypt bogofilter") and external ones (all packages
> mail-client/claws-mail-*) anymore.
>
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:54:07 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:34:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
> > > The issue is that OpenRC does not have any kind of dependency on
> > > gentoo-oldnet at all. There will be
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > if we keep a dependency for a while, even behind something like
> > IUSE="+oldnet", when we drop it, people will still be hit if they do
> > emerge --depclean before they emerg
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:54 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> if we keep a dependency for a while, even behind something like
> IUSE="+oldnet", when we drop it, people will still be hit if they do
> emerge --depclean before they emerge gentoo-oldnet.
>
> Also, (although I don't really care about this mu
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:34:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > > On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet script
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:23:23 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out
> > > into their own package separate from OpenRC so that
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 13:01:39 William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:45:04PM +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Please don't do this. It sounds to me like a stupid move, what are you
> > trying to accomplish? You already use Git/GitHub...
> > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
> > fl
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:58:21PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out
> > into their own package separate from OpenRC so
On 04/24/2013 02:51 AM, René Neumann wrote:
> As more and more packages seem to (mis)use USE_EXPAND: Can we get the
> possibility to set this directly in package.use? Having to write
> 'claws_mail_plugins_foo' does not help readability, and setting it in
> make.conf is also not the right way (as is
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 05:45:04PM +0100, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Please don't do this. It sounds to me like a stupid move, what are you
> trying to accomplish? You already use Git/GitHub...
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
> flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>
robbat2 is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/04/13 12:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out
> into their own package separate from OpenRC so that they can be
> developed independently. I am looking at doing this for OpenRC
Please don't do this. It sounds to me like a stupid move, what are you
trying to accomplish? You already use Git/GitHub...
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> it has been suggested that
All,
it has been suggested that gentoo's oldnet scripts be split out into
their own package separate from OpenRC so that they can be developed
independently. I am looking at doing this for OpenRC 0.12, which I hope
to release soon.
This means when you emerge or upgrade to openrc-0.12, the net.* s
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> 13. Gerrit's push to tree fails, since tree with changeset A isn't in
> changeset B's ancestry.
>
Honestly, this is a problem with any use of repoman with git unless
you let the server auto-merge trivial changes. Cvs tracks commits at
the f
On 04/24/2013 07:21 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
>> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
>
> I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
> by a CI system
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
> > with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
>
> I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
> by a CI system hooked up to the Gerr
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks
> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run
by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers pus
Jeroen Roovers posted on Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:00:53 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 + (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
>> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then pus
Ben de Groot posted on Wed, 24 Apr 2013 00:24:13 +0800 as excerpted:
> I just want to make sure infinality will remain
> available to our users.
To save others wondering WTF infinality is the google I had to do...
http://www.infinality.net/blog/infinality-freetype-patches/
https://wiki.archlinu
Hi!
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:19:05PM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote
> > The second problem, however, is trickier. We can rely on people
> > noticing the error messages/broken packages and hope they file
> > bugs. The other option is to have a QA-like chec
Am 21.04.2013 23:38, schrieb Christian Faulhammer:
> Hello everybody,
>
> the upcoming Claws Mail release will have no separation between
> internal plugins (stuff that is built on mail-client/claws-mail with
> USE="crypt bogofilter") and external ones (all packages
> mail-client/claws-mail-*) any
Le dimanche 21 avril 2013 à 23:38 +0200, Christian Faulhammer a écrit :
> Hello everybody,
>
> the upcoming Claws Mail release will have no separation between
> internal plugins (stuff that is built on mail-client/claws-mail with
> USE="crypt bogofilter") and external ones (all packages
> mail-cli
# Ulrich Müller (24 Apr 2013)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. HOMEPAGE and SRC_URI dead,
# mirror restricted, distfile cannot be located. Bug #441930.
sys-apps/kuroevtd
pgpyIhOf3bGaZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
41 matches
Mail list logo
