On 04/24/2013 07:21 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks >> with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. > > I would argue that repoman and/or corresponding checks should be run > by a CI system hooked up to the Gerrit instance that developers push to.
So, let me get this straight ... $now: Developer A makes a change to automake $now+10min: Change is pushed to CI ... ... $now + 2 weeks: Initial testrun done, 734 potential issues found (and 2 weeks is a pretty generous optimistic estimate) $now + 4 weeks: Triaging and 50% fixing done $now + 8 weeks: Developer forgot about the issue while going on vacation $now + 12 weeks: Developer B, unaware of the prior work, pushes the same change again and waits 2 weeks too etc. etc. > > Anything else is IMO waste of developers' time and minds. At least your idea is completely unrelated to reality and a waste of developer's time and minds, but thanks for bringing up something completely silly again.