Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > So you think we need to restrict fetch so we can let the user know about > the licensing thing? No. If a user wants Gentoo to help them stay on top of their licenses there is already a mechanism for this - ACCEPT_LICENSE. The spotify "licen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop > > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this > > time around* that eclass shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:53:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/11/12 09:09 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius > > wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > >> > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 06-11-2012 a las 00:02 -0600, William Hubbs escribió: > All, > > I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC. > We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs > it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in > moving

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Matthew Thode
On 11/06/2012 12:32 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode > wrote: >> One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I >> don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That >> sound acceptable? > > The last time I looked a

[gentoo-dev] tools-portage herd unmaintained packages

2012-11-06 Thread Paul Varner
All: The following packages in the tools-portage herd are effectively unmaintained packages and need a maintainer to step up and maintain them. app-portage/deltup app-portage/epm app-portage/maintainer-helper app-portage/splat app-portage/ufed If no one steps up in the next 30 days, I will be mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > One option that's been presented to me is to add restrict mirror (I > don't think restricting fetch is needed, but meh what do I know). That > sound acceptable? The last time I looked at the ebuild that was already done. We have no other ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] spotify license

2012-11-06 Thread Matthew Thode
On 10/29/2012 09:17 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > It's looking hard to be able to add the spotify ebuild to tree because > of licensing concerns. > > http://www.spotify.com/us/legal/end-user-agreement/ > > 10:02 < prometheanfire > do you have a plaintext version? I can copy > the text, but just tho

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring wrote: >> > This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally >> > document thus: >> > >> > 1) What your finished so

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 06 novembre 2012 à 14:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : [snip] Forgot to add that obviously, as already explained by Michał, distutils-r1 being (almost) the only demo out there to make use of this new eclass, most the of little things that would make it a success may still be miss

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/06/2012 09:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: >>> After upgrade i got this: … * The dep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 09:09 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >>> On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -05

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:29:05AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: > > After upgrade i got this: … > >> * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc > > … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:57:05 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius > > wrote: [...] > >> Sure -- note, though, that if $type == "kern" and $KV is u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 08:30 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius > wrote: [...] >> Sure -- note, though, that if $type == "kern" and $KV is unset, >> then this function does *NOT* return valid values. > > only if yo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:11:44 -0500 Ian Stakenvicius wrote: [...] > Sure -- note, though, that if $type == "kern" and $KV is unset, then > this function does *NOT* return valid values. only if you hit the case where its needed > It might be worthwhile > looking up why $type == "kern" on these p

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 05:17 AM, XMs wrote: > After upgrade i got this: … >> * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc > … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it > in FHS (by «man hier», maybe i have old version?). Doe

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 05 novembre 2012 à 16:48 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit : > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, > *this > time around* that eclass should actually have a plan so that we don't > wind up i

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/11/12 06:57 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > Hi, > > [...] >> --- ChangeLog27 Sep 2012 22:42:48 - 1.417 +++ ChangeLog >> 28 >> Sep 2012 15:07:30 - 1.418 @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ # ChangeLog for >> eclass directory # Copyright

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog toolchain-funcs.eclass

2012-11-06 Thread Alexis Ballier
Hi, [...] > --- ChangeLog 27 Sep 2012 22:42:48 - 1.417 > +++ ChangeLog 28 Sep 2012 15:07:30 - 1.418 > @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ > # ChangeLog for eclass directory > # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2 > -# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/ChangeL

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread XMs
After upgrade i got this: … > * The dependency data could not be migrated to /run/openrc … I don't have /run/ in my system and can't find anything about it in FHS (by «man hier», maybe i have old version?). Does it mean i have to create /run/ directory, or OpenRC still can work without it? signatu

[gentoo-dev] Re: OpenRC-0.11.4 call for testers

2012-11-06 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:02:35 -0600 as excerpted: > I would like to make OpenRC-0.11.4 the next stable candidate for OpenRC. > We need it before we can stable a newer genkernel, and releng also needs > it stable for the install cds. Because of this, I am interested in > moving