On 28 August 2012 05:11, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> $ quse -D adns ares
> global:adns: Adds support for the adns DNS client library
> local:ares:dev-libs/ecore: Enables support for asynchronous DNS using the
> net-dns/c-ares library
> local:ares:net-analyzer/wireshark: Use GNU net-dns/c-
On 29 August 2012 01:36, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
>> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
>> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
>
> udev might or might not eventually get forked
On 28/08/2012 15:36, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> static-libs is for installing static libraries IN ADDITION to shared
> libraries, not instead.
> USE=static is for what you have in mind there.
PE is not the same as ELF so on Windows you either build one or the
other for a number of reasons.
Now on a d
On N, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +, Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> On 8/28/2012 1:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:15:40 +0200
> > hasufell wrote:
> >> static-libs
> > pointless
>
> I have to mask this flag for dev-libs/{gmp,mpc} in my cygwin overlay,
> where one can have static or
On 8/28/2012 1:09 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:15:40 +0200
hasufell wrote:
static-libs
pointless
I have to mask this flag for dev-libs/{gmp,mpc} in my cygwin overlay,
where one can have static or dynamic, but not both, as per. upstream
requirements (no idea why). So FTR,
On 08/28/2012 05:35 PM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
udev might or might not eventually get forked to avoid systemd
borg-approach.
mdev works fine for
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> I think this issue is currently in far too murky of a state to get any
> well-informed issue from the council. Perhaps when the issues get
> hammered out a bit more, but not currently.
I tend to agree. Taking a position for or against some
On 28 August 2012 12:59, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
>> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
>> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
>>
>> I saw on the forum this thread :
>> https:/
On 08/28/2012 10:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
>
> I saw on the forum this thread :
> https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/12 11:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject,
>> but I would like to know if there's any official position about
>> the current
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Sylvain Alain wrote:
> Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
> like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
There is not. But thanks for starting the flamewar just the same. :)
>
> I saw on the
Hi everyone, I don't want to start a flamewar on that subject, but I would
like to know if there's any official position about the current situation.
I saw on the forum this thread :
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-934678-highlight-.html and maybe it
could be part of a solution to have OpenR
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:45:59 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 28/08/12 10:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:10:01 +0200 Tiziano Müller
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/12 10:43 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:10:01 +0200 Tiziano Müller
> wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny:
>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
>>> Arahesi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/12 10:35 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
>> Arahesis wrote:
>>
>>> 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
+case $
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:10:01 +0200
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200
> > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >
> > > 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > ++
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if you have noticed, but many developers in Gentoo
> dislike process ;)
>
And I'd count myself chief among them. But then again, compared to
what it takes at work to do anything productive, the "process" at
Gentoo just seems li
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
>> 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> > +# Copyright 1999-2012 G
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>> That's all I'm saying. It's being made a whole lot less pleasant that it
>> might be... for what reason? Just to satisfy someone's ego that they're
>> right and can /f
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 09:43 +0200 schrieb hasufell:
> On 08/28/2012 06:26 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >
> > There needs to be a way to specify maximal accepted slot of Boost.
> > Examples of some possibilities: * BOOST_MAX_SLOT="1.49" global
> > variable * '--max 1.49'
Am Dienstag, den 28.08.2012, 10:06 +0200 schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
> > 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > > +# Copyri
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 02:15:40 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> Is there a reason not to support static-libs in an ebuild if the
> package supports it?
>
> It seems some developers don't care about this option. What's the
> gentoo policy on this? Isn't this actually a bug?
Some people believe that IUSE=st
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:43:37 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/28/2012 06:26 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> >
> > There needs to be a way to specify maximal accepted slot of Boost.
> > Examples of some possibilities: * BOOST_MAX_
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 06:26:02 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
> 2012-08-28 00:19:28 Michał Górny napisał(a):
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gx86/eclass/boost-utils.eclass
> > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> > +# Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
> > +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU G
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:03:53 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 28. August 2012, 00:19:28 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > Right now, it just contains the function Tiziano listed in his
> > post[1]. I'd appreciate further ideas, feedback, and possibly an
> > example from someone who will a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2012 06:26 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
>
> There needs to be a way to specify maximal accepted slot of Boost.
> Examples of some possibilities: * BOOST_MAX_SLOT="1.49" global
> variable * '--max 1.49' arguments for boost-ut
26 matches
Mail list logo
