On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, easior wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I am a TeX user with TeX Live installed by Gentoo portage. Recently, I found
> that the TeX Live version have been updated to 2012 and I want to refresh my
> Gentoo system. Unfortunately, the package, texlive-basic-2012, couldn't be
> p
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:33:48PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote
> The technical objection to C.UTF-8 is that it's non-standard, Ok.
> What are the technical objections to LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8? If the
> alternatives are all improvements, the statistics are irrelevant.
I ran into a problem sever
On 07/30/12 12:28, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> My point here is that you want the thing to change. So you first try to
> convince people here to change. We practically did a small survey here
> and in the result we didn't agree on doing the change.
>
> So you're saying we should do another survey on
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:50:29 -0400
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> On 07/30/12 10:41, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400
>> > Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:38:28PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote
> Forking udev and making sure it stays as lean as possible isn't that bad.
That describes mdev to a T. No need to re-invent the wheel.
> Making mdev a bit richer and enjoy the speed advantage of busybox
> over stand alone shells co
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:50:29 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/30/12 10:41, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400
> > Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a defaul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/30/2012 11:04 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400 Michael Orlitzky
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
No user will be happ
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>
> You'd really want to a "which do you prefer, which can you use"
> survey, then; You don't really want to choose the result preferred by
> the most people, rather you want the result which is usable by the
> most people.
I tend to agree. Do
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>> >
>> > No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a default.
>>
>> The defaults should be what's best for the most p
On 07/30/12 10:41, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>>>
>>> No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a default.
>>
>> The defaults should be what's best for the most people, with a bia
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> >
> > No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a default.
>
> The defaults should be what's best for the most people, with a bias
> towards safety. Why don't we just take a s
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>>
>> No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a default.
>
> The defaults should be what's best for the most people, with a bias
> towards safety. Why don't we just take a survey
On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
>
> No user will be happy with whatever we decide to use as a default.
The defaults should be what's best for the most people, with a bias
towards safety. Why don't we just take a survey and choose the most
common utf8 response?
13 matches
Mail list logo