I'd add it, it is a gpl incompatible opensource license.
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
Software License for The Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
© Copyright 1995 - 2012 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten
Forschung e.V.
All ri
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:58:30 +0200 as
excerpted:
> Kent Fredric schrieb:
>> On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> wrote:
>>> I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the
>>> firmware in the category of what it is for...
>>
>> If you w
Kent Fredric schrieb:
> On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>> A fair point, suggestion retracted. I'm on board with sys-firmware as
>> well, but I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the
>> firmware in the category of what it is for...
>
> If you wanted, you c
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Kent Fredric wrote:
> In short, "Yay, thanks for sys-firmware, I look forward to it not
> being an empty category"
We could create a category metadata file. ;)
Is the following O.K.:
"The sys-firmware category contains various firmware and microcode."
Ulrich
On Wednesday 25 July 2012 12:38:05 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven
> >> variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS,
> >> and IUSE, even if their value is empty.
>
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:38:05 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> >> Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven
> >> variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS,
> >> and IUSE, even if their value is empt
On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> A fair point, suggestion retracted. I'm on board with sys-firmware as
> well, but I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the
> firmware in the category of what it is for...
If you wanted, you could do something like x11-driv
On 22 July 2012 16:12, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> I've got a few ROMs to add to the tree and some which are already in
> the tree if people have a suggestion where they should live. Short
> list:
>
> ipxe
> openbios
> seabios
> sgabios
> vgabios
>
> --
> Doug Goldstein
>
I just noticed that the sys-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2012 12:56 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mié, 25-07-2012 a las 18:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> [...]
>> The single exception to this is IUSE, which
>> is required to be present in an ebuild even if it's empty. Maybe we
>> should drop thi
El mié, 25-07-2012 a las 18:38 +0200, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
[...]
> The single exception to this is IUSE, which
> is required to be present in an ebuild even if it's empty. Maybe we
> should drop this requirement, too.
+1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven
>> variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS,
>> and IUSE, even if their value is empty.
>>
>> Could we drop this requirement? Repoman already enforces th
On Wednesday 18 July 2012 13:53:37 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven
> variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS, and
> IUSE, even if their value is empty.
>
> Could we drop this requirement? Repoman already enforces
On Thursday 19 July 2012 02:57:09 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >> Many eclasses (eutils being the most prominent example) contain:
> >> DESCRIPTION="Based on the ${ECLASS} eclass"
> >>
> >> Is this of any use?
> >
> > The reason that sort of thing is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/25/2012 10:27 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> On 07/24/201
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Another user opinion...it would be a signifi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/07/12 08:55 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:42:31AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote
>
>> man 5 portage about files in /etc/portage
>>
>> make.conf The global custom settings for Portage. See
>> make.conf(5). If present, this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/07/12 05:13 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:32:00PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> I've often seen cases like these handled by keeping a referenced
>> file where it's traditionally expected to be found, but leaving a
>>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> Another user opinion...it would be a significant improvement to
>> the stage images and live discs to include the latest copy of the
>> han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/24/2012 04:19 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> Another user opinion...it would be a significant improvement to
> the stage images and live discs to include the latest copy of the
> handbook, so that a network connection isn't required to access
> it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/24/2012 04:30 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> Hmm, are the manuals versioned with a public interface (git clone
> …/handbook.git)? That would make finding new gems in the manual
> much easier.
>
Yes, yes they are.
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 20:55 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:42:31AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote
>
> > man 5 portage about files in /etc/portage
> >
> > make.conf
> > The global custom settings for Portage. See make.conf(5). If
> > present, this file will over?
Sven Vermeulen posted on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:05:02 + as excerpted:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:15:43PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> I think a news item is reasonable here (in addition to the above). Most
>> users don't know about the move from /etc/make.conf to
>> /etc/portage/make.conf.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 01:15:43PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> I think a news item is reasonable here (in addition to the above). Most
> users don't know about the move from /etc/make.conf to
> /etc/portage/make.conf. After this change, there will be a
> gradually-increasing need to know that
24 matches
Mail list logo
