Kent Fredric schrieb: > On 23 July 2012 08:48, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina <zeroch...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> A fair point, suggestion retracted. I'm on board with sys-firmware as >> well, but I do see some advantage of the current way of putting the >> firmware in the category of what it is for... > > If you wanted, you could do something like x11-drivers/ do , and have > a standard of adding a little subcategorization:
Could you be more specific? What does x11-drivers/ do that applies here? > sys-firmware/video-ati If it is really desired to state the firmware purpose in category/package, then I would prefer firmware-gpu/radeon-ucode firmware-video/cx18-firmware firmware-audio/alsa-firmware firmware-net/isdn-firmware or similar. This would be better than deviating from upstream package name. Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
